EFFECTS OF LEADER PERSISTENCE AND LEADER BEHAVIOR ON LEADERSHIP PERCEPTIONS (original) (raw)
Related papers
When leaders have character: Need for leadership, performance, and the attribution of leadership
This study examined the effects of departmental performance and employees' need for leadership on respondent's perceptions of leader effectiveness, leadership traits, and prototypicality of the leader. A sample of 150 Dutch University students participated in a 2 x 2 plus control-group design. Results show that both need for leadership and .p erformance manipulations have an effect on the perceived effectiveness and goal orientation of the leader. These effects are elaborated by an interaction effect. In the strong need for leadership and high performance condition the leader's perceived effectiveness and goal orientation were disproportionately higher than in the other conditions. However, only a main effect of need for leadership occurred on perceived leader's support orient~tion. The leader was perceived as more supportive in the strong than in the weak need for leadership condition. Results are discussed in light of the "romance of leadership" theory (Meindl, Ehrlich, and Dukerich, 1985) and compared with findings from field studies. Leadership has been shown to be an important mental construct. Aniong others, journalists, television reporters, and business watchers refer to leadership extensively to understand highly complex organizational processes and to explain the nature of organizational success and failure. Meindl (1990) shows that leadership is a more focal concept in explaining organizational performance than either the employees of a company, the market-forces, or governmental regulations. He uses the term "romance of leadership" to describe subordinates' and observers' cognitive, behavioral and affective infatuation with leadership. Although some research has been conducted on the romance of leadership in successful and unsuccessful organizations/groups, research on situational determinants (i.e., subordinate, task, organizational, and environmental characteristics other than individual and organizational outcomes) of
EFFECTS OF GROUP PERFORMANCE AND LEADER BEHAVIOR ON LEADERSHIP PERCEPTIONS
1987
The study examined the effects of group performance and leader behavior on leadership perceptions. One hundred fifty engineering undergraduates participated in roleplaying situations. They were randomly assigned to one of the six treatment conditions in the 2 x 3 factorial experiment. Results indicated that ratings on leadership perceptions were significantly influenced by the interaction between group performance and leader behavior. Certain main effects, as expected, of leader behavior and group performance were also observed. Implications of these findings for those in leadership roles are discussed. and directions for future research are suggested.
Behavioural theory of leadership
The leadership literature suffers from a lack of theoretical integration (Avolio, 2007, American Psychologist, 62, 25-33). This article addresses that lack of integration by developing an integrative trait-behavioral model of leadership effectiveness and then examining the relative validity of leader traits (gender, intelligence, personality) and behaviors (transformational-transactional, initiating structure-consideration) across 4 leadership effectiveness criteria (leader effectiveness, group performance, follower job satisfaction, satisfaction with leader). Combined, leader traits and behaviors explain a minimum of 31% of the variance in leadership effectiveness criteria. Leader behaviors tend to explain more variance in leadership effectiveness than leader traits, but results indicate that an integrative model where leader behaviors mediate the relationship between leader traits and effectiveness is warranted.
The Effectiveness of Leadership Behavior Among
2016
Abstract: People in organizations develop in their minds an implicit theory of leadership describing how an effective leader should act, and a leader prototype or mental image of what characteristics of effective leader should have. This paper aims to empirically determine the level of leadership effectiveness and leaders ’ behavior from subordinates ’ perception. This study is a cross-sectional research by distributing a set of questionnaire to academicians at local university, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Terengganu. A sample of 128 of academicians from seven faculties responded to a questionnaire which measured the leadership effectiveness and leaders ’ behavior. Decision making, leadership performance, personal characteristics and communication skill are identified as the most important areas for effective leaders ’ behavior. Leadership effectiveness model was adopted from Cumming. The findings show that the score for leadership effectiveness is the highest, followed by decision-m...
Journal of Management and Science, 2024
The behavioural approaches of a leader to focus on motivating the employees with a satisfactory work environment and well-being and the tasks needed to be performed to meet goals or achieve certain performance standards refer to "relation-oriented and task-oriented leadership behaviours". The need for effective leadership has become obvious in the workplace to meet the goals of an organization by satisfying and motivating the employees. The present research is aimed at measuring the significant differences between the employees on relation-oriented and task-oriented leadership behaviours reflecting in their leaders. The present study is conducted among the employees of select autonomous institutions located in Hyderabad City, Telangana State. The sample respondents (n=156) constitute the employees of select institutions, both in the in the teaching and non-teaching professions. The statistical results reveal that the employees of select institutions with respect to their age, designation, and gender have similar perceptions of the "relation-oriented and task-oriented leadership behaviours" of their leaders, whereas the employees of various experience levels have significant differences.
Developing Leader Behaviours among the Students of an Educational Leadership Programme
Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 2018
Educationists have been showing considerable interest in knowing factors affecting leader effectiveness. In the midst of ineffective educational leadership and educational leadership development programmes, leader behaviours are considered one of the important predictors of leadership effectiveness and thus to be developed in educational programmes. This One-Group Pretest-Posttest Experimental Research explored the extent to which the participation in a course unit of the Educational Leadership Programme, offered by the Centre of Educational Leadership Development (CELD), Karachi, Pakistan, developed the required leader behaviours among the postgraduate level students. Fleishman's Leadership Opinion Questionnaire (Pierce & Newstrom, 2005a) was used for the pretest and the posttest. Participants of the research were eighty four (84) Postgraduate Certificate in Educational Leadership or Master of Educational Leadership students, who studied the Perspectives of Leadership unit. It was expected that this unit would not only assist students to build the strong knowledge base and acquire certain leadership skills, but also develop high level of appropriate behaviours which would prepare them to cope with the scope of the challenges which face them as well as create or maintain a positive, thriving organisational climate in their schools. Contrary to expected outcomes, the research revealed that the unit participants exhibited significant but relatively moderate orientation towards the expected leader behaviours. The research has challenged the legitimacy of the approaches used to teach the course and recommended a thorough study of the factors that contribute to the development of leader behaviours among leadership students.
Leadership behavior as a function of the leader, the follower, and the situation1
Journal of Personality, 1965
This article is based upon a dissertation submitted m parbal fulfihnent of the reqmrements for the PhD degree at the Umversity of Texas The author wishes to acknowledge his mdebtedness to F H Sanford, Chairman of the Doctoral Committee, for his support and advice durmg all phases of this study 2 Now at the Umversity of Richmond Leadership behavior
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2013
This paper research overview of the leader behavior literature highlighted the fact that there are inconsistent relationships between the behaviors that leaders engage in and the effects of these behaviors on member attitudes, behavior, and group effectiveness. While these inconsistent observations can be frustrating they underscore two very important facts. The behaviors are important as witnessed by their occasionally significant relationship with follower attitudes and behavior. Second, the observation that these behaviors do not always produce significant and positive effects suggests that something else is transpiring such that in one situation the particular leader behavior produces significant effects and in another situation that behavior is relatively unimportant. The question that these observations raise is. What effects do situational differences produce in the leader-follower relationship? Many decades ago Ralph S (1948) stated that "the qualities characteristics, and skills required in a leader are determined to a large extent by the demands of the situation in which he [she] is to function as a leader" chapter 8 provides an understanding of situational differences in the leadership process. If team members know for example, exactly what needs to be done, when, who and why, it is unlikely that initiating structure will prove to be needed or be effective if use. In contrast, when team members are operating under conditions of high levels of uncertainty-not knowing what, when or how to execute the task-a leader who is capable of initiating some structure will make a meaningful contribution. In this paper we are focus in leader role and in the influences of rationality behavior. The simple theme of this paper is might well be "different strokes for different folks" and/or "different strokes for the same folks at different points in time". Put more directly, as conditions change, so do the leadership needs that are created and the leader behaviors that will prove effective. We are trying to analyze the effects of using different hypotheses in some definitions of leadership theories, the implementation of effects of leader behavior in organizations.