On the Calviriidae Martens and Curini-Galletti, 1993 (Platyhelminthes, Proseriata), with the description of three new species (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Interrelationships of Proseriata (Platyhelminthes: Seriata) Tested with Molecules and Morphology
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2000
Proseriate flatworms are common members of the interstitial benthic fauna worldwide, predominantly occupying marine environments. As minute animals, having relatively few characters useful for cladistic analysis, they have been difficult to present in a phylogenetic framework using morphology alone. Here we present a new morphological matrix consisting of 16 putatively homologous characters and two molecular data sets to investigate further this major group of free-living members of the Platyhelminthes. Complete 18S rDNA (representing 277 parsimony-informative characters) from 17 ingroup taxa and partial 28S rDNA spanning variable expansion regions D1 to D3 and D1 to D6 (representing 219 and 361 parsimony-informative characters, respectively) from 27 and 14 ingroup taxa, respectively, were determined and aligned as complementary data sets. Morphological and molecular data sets were analyzed separately and together to determine underlying phylogenetic patterns and to resolve conflict between published scenarios based on morphology alone. The monophyly of the Proseriata cannot be confirmed categorically with any of these data sets. However, the constituent taxa are confirmed as basal members of the Neoophora, and a sister group relationship with Tricladida is rejected. Similarly, the monophyly of one of the two subtaxa of the Proseriata, the Lithophora, could not be confirmed with molecules. Concerning intragroup relationships, we could reject one of the two phylogenetic trees formerly proposed, as well as the clade Otoplanidae ؉ Coelogynoporidae. However, a clade Otoplanidae ؉ Archimonocelididae ؉ Monocelididae (to which the Monotoplanidae belong) was supported, and the position of the genus Calviria shifted from the Archimonocelididae to the Coelogynoporidae.
Zoologica Scripta, 2017
Representatives of the Meidiamidae and Otomesostomidae (Platyhelminthes: Proseriata) are seldom encountered, and the monophyly and phylogenetic relationships of these families have never been assessed on molecular basis. Here, we present the first exhaustive molecular study of Proseriata at the family level, including species belonging to the genera Meidiama and Yorknia (Meidiamidae), and Otomesostoma auditivum (Otomesostomidae), using 18S and 28S genes as markers. We performed phylogenetic analyses (Maximum Likelihood [ML] and Bayesian Inference [BI] methods) and species delimitation methods (Single/Multiple Threshold-Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent [ST/MT-GMYC] and Poisson Tree Processes [PTP/bPTP]). The taxon Meidiamidae was not supported, since the type species (Meidiama lutheri) and Meidiama etrusca sp. n. are nested within the Archimonocelididae, formerly restricted to specialized cnidarian feeders. Species belonging to the genus Yorknia resulted genetically well separated from species of Meidiama and from the rest of Archimonocelididae. The new family-level taxon Yorkniidae fam. n. is thus here introduced, to include the type species of Yorknia (Yorknia aprostatica), and six new species, five of which are formally described here. Otomesostoma auditivum, representative of Otomesostomidae, the only exclusively freshwater taxon of the Proseriata, is the sister taxon of the predominantly marine Apingospermata. This result is not conflictual with the family level attributed to Otomesostomidae on morphological grounds, but it raises speculations on the marine versus freshwater origin of Apingospermata.
Contributions to the phylogeny of platyhelminthes based on partial sequencing of 18S ribosomal DNA
International Journal for Parasitology, 1993
Partial sequencing of the 18S ribosomal DNA gene of one nemertean and 13 free-living and parasitic Platyhelminthes (556 nucleotides), and of one nemertean and 20 Platyhelminthes (556 nucleotides) was used to test several hypotheses concerning the phylogenetic relationships of Platyhelminthes. The following conclusions were reached: the Neodermata is monophyletic; Trematoda (Aspidogastrea and Digenea) is monophyletic, although a sister group relationship of the Aspidogastrea and all other Neodermata cannot be definitely ruled out; the Cestoda comprising the Eucestoda, Amphilinidea and Gyrocotylidea is monophyletic; it is unresolved whether the Monogenea is paraphyletic; neither Gyrocotylidea and Monopisthocotylea nor Gyrocotylidea and Monogenea as a whole are sister groups; Anoplodiscus is a monopisthocotylean monogenean; none of Proseriata, Pterastericolidae/Umagillidae, Kalyptorhynchia, Rhabdocoela as a whole, Dalyelliida or the Temnocephalidae is the sister group of the Neodermata; there is some evidence that a larger taxon consisting of Proseriata, Tricladida and Rhabdocoela may be the sister group of the Neodermata but definitive evidence for a sister group relationship between the Neodermata and any turbellarian taxon is lacking; Rhabdocoela and Lecithoepitheliata are not closely related; it is unresolved whether the Rhabdocoela is monophyletic; Umagillidae, Pterastericolidae and Temnocephalidae belong to one monophylum; the Temnocephalidae are very close to the dalyelliids; Tricladida and Rhabdocoela are sister groups, the exact position of the Catenulida and Nemertini in relation to the Platyhelminthes has not been resolved, although Catenulida and Lecithoepitheliata may belong to one clade.
Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 1998
The suborder Tricladida (Platyhelminthes: Turbellaria, Seriata) comprises most well-known species of free-living £atworms. Four infraorders are recognized: (i) the Maricola (marine planarians); (ii) the Cavernicola (a group of primarily cavernicolan planarians); (iii) the Paludicola (freshwater planarians); and (iv) the Terricola (land planarians). The phylogenetic relationships among these infraorders have been analysed using morphological characters, but they remain uncertain. Here we analyse the phylogeny and classi¢cation of the Tricladida, with additional, independent, molecular data from complete sequences of 18S rDNA and 18S rRNA. We use maximum parsimony and neighbour-joining methods and the characterization of a unique gene duplication event involving the Terricola and the dugesiids to reconstruct the phylogeny. The results show that the Maricola is monophyletic and is the primitive sister group to the rest of the Tricladida (the Paludicola plus the Terricola). The Paludicola are paraphyletic since the Terricola and one paludicolan family, the Dugesiidae, share a more recent common ancestor than the dugesiids with other paludicolans (dendrocoelids and planariids). A reassessment of morphological evidence may con¢rm the apparent redundancy of the existing infraorders Paludicola and Terricola. In the meantime, we suggest replacing the Paludicola and Terricola with a new clade, the Continenticola, which comprises the families Dugesiidae, Planariidae, Dendrocoelidae and the Terricola.
Phylogenetic Relationships of Platyhelminthes Based on 18S Ribosomal Gene Sequences
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1998
Nucleotide sequences of 18S ribosomal RNA from 71 species of Platyhelminthes, the flatworms, were analyzed using maximum likelihood, and the resulting phylogenetic trees were compared with previous phylogenetic hypotheses. Analyses including 15 outgroup species belonging to eight other phyla show that Platyhelminthes are monophyletic with the exception of a sequence putatively from Acoela sp., Lecithoepitheliata, Polycladida, Tricladida, Trematoda (Aspidobothrii ؉ Digenea), Monogenea, and Cestoda (Gyrocotylidea ؉ Amphilinidea ؉ Eucestoda) are monophyletic groups. Catenulids form the sister group to the rest of platyhelminths, whereas a complex clade formed by Acoela, Tricladida, ''Dalyellioida,'' and perhaps ''Typhloplanoida'' is sister to Neodermata. ''Typhloplanoida'' does not appear to be monophyletic; Fecampiida does not appear to belong within ''Dalyellioida,'' nor Kalyptorhynchia within ''Typhloplanoida.'' Trematoda is the sister group to the rest of Neodermata, and Monogenea is sister group to Cestoda. Within Trematoda, Aspidobothrii is the sister group of Digenea and Heronimidae is the most basal family in Digenea. Our trees support the hypothesis that parasitism evolved at least twice in Platyhelminthes, once in the ancestor to Neodermata and again in the ancestor of Fecampiida, independently to the ancestor of putatively parasitic ''Dalyellioida.''
Marine Biodiversity, 2017
Two new species of Otoplana (Proseriata: Otoplanidae) from the Canary Islands are here described: Otoplana norenburgi sp. nov. and Otoplana didomenicoi sp. nov. These new species are distinguished from their congeners by unique features of the sclerotized structures of the copulatory organ, in particular of the aculeus, swollen proximally in O. norenburgi sp. nov. and lanceolate in shape in O. didomenicoi sp. nov. Specimens of the latter species were also found in South Portugal. Canarian and Portuguese specimens show poor genetic distinction based on the markers used, hinting to a remarkable dispersal power for a mesopsammic organism. New information is given on the Baccessory male canal^, a putative autapomorphy for the genus Otoplana. Its functions and connections with genital systems are discussed, in the light of new data on the molecular phylogeny of the family Otoplanidae presented. The Mediterranean specimens of Otoplana sequenced, morphologically attributed to O. truncaspina, O. bosporana, O. falcataspina, and O. labronica, did not show genetic distinction, urging for a reconsideration of the status of the Mediterranean taxa.
Phylogeny of the Platyhelminthes and the evolution of parasitism
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1999
Robust phylogenies provide the basis for interpreting biological variation in the light of evolution. Homologous features provide phylogenetically informative characters whereas homoplasious characters provide phylogenetic noise. Both provide evolutionary signal. We have constructed molecular and morphologically based phylogenies of the phylum Platyhelminthes using a recently revised morphological character matrix and complete 18s and two partial 28s rRNA gene sequences in order to evaluate the emergence and subsequent divergence of parasitic forms. In total we examine 65 morphological characters, 97 18s rDNA, 41 D1 domain 28s rDNA, and 49 D3-D6 domain 28s rDNA sequences. For the molecular data there were 748, 132 and 249 phylogenetically informative sites for the 18S, DI and D3-D6 28s rDNA data sets respectively. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic solutions are incongruent but not incompatible, and using the principles of conditional combination (18s rDNA + morphology passing Templeton's test) they demonstrate: a single and relatively early origin for the parasitic Neodermata (including the cestodes, trematodes and monogeneans); sister-group status between the cestodes and monogeneans, and between these taxa and the trematodes (digeneans and aspidogastreans). The sister-group to the Neodermata is liiely to be a large clade of neoophoran turbellarians, based on combined evidence, or a clade consisting of the Fecampiid + Urastomid turbellarians, based on morphological evidence alone. The combined evidence solution for the phylogeny of flatworms based on 18s rDNA and morphology is used to interpret morphological and life-history data and to support a model for the evolution and radiation of neodermatan parasites in the group.
Phylogeny and a revised classification of the Monogenoidea Bychowsky, 1937 (Platyhelminthes)
Systematic Parasitology, 1993
A hypothesis (CI=57.3%) on the evolutionary relationships of families comprising the class Monogenoidea is proposed based on 141 character states in 47 homologous series and employing phylogenetic systematics. Based on the analysis, three subclasses, the Polyonchoinea, Polystomatoinea and Oligonchoinea, are recognised. The analysis supports independent origins of the Montchadskyellidae within the Polyonchoinea and of the Neodactylodiscidae and Amphibdellatidae within the order Dactylogyridea (Polyonchoinea); the suborder Montchadskyellinea is raised to ordinal status and new suborders Neodactylodiscinea and Amphibdellatinea are proposed to reflect these origins. The Gyrodactylidea (Polyonchoinea) is supported by three synapomorphies and comprises the Gyrodactylidae, Anoplodiscidae, Tetraonchoididae and Bothitrematidae. The analysis supports recognition of the Polystomatoinea comprising Polystomatidae and Sphyranuridae. Evolutionary relationships within the Oligonchoinea indicate independent origins of three ordinal taxa, the Chimaericolidea (monotypic), Diclybothriidea (including Diclybothriidae and Hexabothriidae) and Mazocraeidea (with five suborders). The suborder Mazocraeinea comprises the Plectanocotylidae, Mazocraeidae and Mazoplectidae, and is characterised by two synapomorphies. The suborder Gastrocotylinea, characterised by presence of accessory sclerites in the haptoral sucker, is divided into two infraorders, the monotypic Anthocotylina infraorder novum and Gastrocotylina. Two superfamilies of the Gastrocotylina are recognised, the Protomicrocotyloidea and Gastrocotyloidea; the Pseudodiclidophoridae is considered incertae sedis within the Gastrocotylina. The suborder Discocotylinea comprises the Discocotylidae, Octomacridae and Diplozoidae and is supported by four synapomorphies. The monotypic Hexostomatinea suborder novum is proposed to reflect an independent origin of the Hexostomatidae within the Mazocraeidea. The terminal suborder Microcotylinea comprises four superfamilies, the Microcotyloidea, Allopyragraphoroidea, Diclidophoroidea and Pyragraphoroidea. The analysis supports incorporation of the Pterinotrematidae in the Pyragraphoroidea and rejection of the monotypic order Pterinotrematidea. The following taxa are also rejected for reasons of paraphyly and/or polyphyly: Articulonchoinea, Bothriocotylea, Eucotylea, Monoaxonematidea, Tetraonchidea, Gotocotyloidea, Anchorophoridae and Macrovalvitrematidae. The Sundanonchidae, Iagotrematidae and Microbothriidae were not included in the analysis because of lack of pertinent information regarding character states.