Syria During the Cold War: The East European Connection (original) (raw)
Related papers
The New Arab Cold War and the Struggle for Syria
Middle East Report, 2012
In his classic study, The Arab Cold War, Malcolm Kerr charted the machinations of inter-Arab politics during an era dominated by Egypt’s President Gamal Abdel Nasser. In another renowned work, The Struggle for Syria, Patrick Seale documented the links between Syria’s tumultuous domestic politics and the broader contest for supremacy in the region, stemming from factors ranging from inter-Arab conflicts to the global cold war.1 Today, amid the chaos in Syria and the transformations in the region, these texts, both originally published in 1965, seem all too contemporary. Once again, regional politics shows many signs of an Arab cold war and, once again, that broader conflict is manifesting itself in a struggle for Syria.
InFocus Quarterly, 2009
Throughout the Cold War, Syria chose to ally with the Soviet Union. From the rise of Khrushchev through the Brezhnev years, Syria played a role in the Soviet strategy to undermine U.S. interests in the region. Even during the Gorbachev years, leading to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Syria failed to grasp a golden opportunity to broaden ties with Washington.
Historical Background and the Present State of the Russian-Syrian Relations
European Researcher, 2012
The political problems related to Syria is a matter which has been discussed from various points of view in the world press in the recent years and have never fallen off the foreign policy agenda of the countries in the world. In this study we shall try to examine the attitude of Russia towards Syria, the historical political, economic and military interests of Russia related to this country and the strategies that it had followed in relation thereto and take care to perceive and interprete the general strategy of this super power in the region.
Syria: The Russian Federation’s Return to the Middle East
The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies, 2020
over the years, the Middle East has played a diverse role in soviet and later russian foreign policy. during the period of rivalry between the ussr and the us, it was an important area of confrontation. after its end, the russian federation became immersed in crisis and lost interest in the region. The Middle East again appeared in the Kremlin's geostrategic thinking after the arab spring which the russian authorities perceived as fuelled and directed by the West, especially the us. The consequences of these social upheavals in the form of the overthrow of the libyan leader or the explicit aspirations of the West to remove Bashar al-assad from power, led vladimir putin to take action. This article is an attempt to interpret russian actions in syria, including its military involvement, through the prism of the Kremlin's neo-superpower policy .
The Origins of the Russian Federation’s Presence in Syria During the Arab Spring
International Journal of Russian Studies, 2022
The Syrian civil war, undoubtedly the bloodiest phase of the Arab Spring, which started with the protests in 2010, continues to be a theatre where global balances have been reshaped and regional power struggles have been staged since 2011. One of the most important actors in this multidimensional chessboard is the Russian Federation. With its involvement in the Syrian civil war, the area called the Near Abroad expanded and extended to the Middle East. In this study, it is argued that such an expansion is the result of the historical sub-consciences inherited by the Russian Federation from the Cold War and the Russian Imperial past, and the origins of the Russian Federation's presence in Syria during the Arab Spring are analyzed with respect to the Near Abroad policy, the Cold War and the Russian Imperial Culture.
2018
The internal situation in Syria during the first four years of conflict resembles a kaleidoscope showing a different picture every minute. Individual elements keep changing their places, some lose their meaning, others take more space, some disappear completely, and new ones take their place. Perhaps this view does not change from day to day, but it surely changes from month to month, and an inexperienced observer may soon be lost in the mass of new information and changing names. The present text aims to present a short review of the situation during the Syrian civil war. The present conflict has its roots deep in the past and in order to understand it one needs to go back in time and describe – even if superficially – the history of Syria since it gained its independence. Its earlier history is, of course, also fascinating, yet if one does not want to be forced to write a book on the five thousand years of Syrian history, it seems fitting to refer the reader to other works on the ...
State led development the privileged linkage between east germany and baathist syria
Contemporary European History, 30, 581–596, 2021
Upon request from the newly established Ba'athist leadership in Syria, the German Democratic Republic sent dozens of special advisors to Damascus between 1965 and 1972 to help set up the state institutions that would move Syria from being a predominantly agricultural country to an agro-industrial one: reforming the decision-making process of national government in Damascus, setting up central planning over produc- tion and distribution and enforcing land reform were some of the key issues dealt with by East German and Syrian officials. The encounter proved highly important because the two regimes came close enough to assess their mutual assets and limits upon which they would establish a long-lasting partnership, whose institutional legacy featured in Syrian formal politics as late as the 2000s. State institutions, mass organisations and public enterprises thus became the main avenues for these two ‘Easts’ to interact during the Cold War.
Military and Politics in Syria (1946-1963)
2021
In “Military and Politics in Syria (1946-1963): Alliances, Conflicts and Purges”, Khouloud Al Zghayare shares an extensiveand detailed analysis of different stages of Syria’s contemporary history, focusing on the “consistent processes of exclusion andpurges between and within the military and politics” which impacted and depleted both institutions. It is as a direct consequence of this struggle and its implications that, over a century after the establishment of modern Syria, there remains “no consensus on an inclusive national identity, and no constitutional government subject to separation of powers”