Andean Past 7 2005 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Editor's Preface Andean Past 6
Andean Past, 2000
This preface discusses some of the editorial decisions made by Andean Past, as well as papers on the Nanchoc lithic tradition of northern Peru by Tom D. Dillehay and Jack Rossen; on the Initial Period settlement of Huaca el Gallo/Huaca la Gallina in Peru's Viru Valley by Thomas A. Zoubek; on the Miraflores Flood disaster and agrarian change in southern Peru by Dennis R. Satterlee, Michael E. Moseley, David K. Keefer, and Jorge E. Tapia; on the iconography of human heads in Paracas textiles by Anne Paul; on the Jeli Phase Complex at La Emerenciana by John Staller; on Ecuadorian Guangala Phase ceramics by Maria Masucci; on spondylus by David Blower; on Hernando Pizarro's coca estates near Cusco by Catherine Julien; on a geophysical method for dating rock art by Robert Bednarik; on the Puzolana obsidian source by Richard L. Burger and Michael D. Glascock; on the history of the Northeast Conference by Richard E. Daggett; and on the history of the Midwest Conference by David L. Browman.
Editor's Preface Andean Past 12
Discusses papers by Richard L. Burger, Catherine M. Bencic, and Michael D. Glascock (Obsidian Procurement and Cosmopolitanism at the Middle Horizon Settlement of Conchopata, Peru); by Edgar Bracamonte (Characteristics and Significance of Tapia Walls and the Mochica Presence at Santa Rosa de Pucala in the Mid-Lambayeque Valley); by Sara L. Juengst and Maeve Skidmore (Health at the Edge of the Wari Empire: An Analysis of Skeletal Remains from Hatun Cotuyoc, Huaro, Peru); and by Camille Weinberg, Benjamin T. Nigra, Maria Cecilia Lozada, Charles Stanish, Henry Tantalean, Jacob Bongers, and Terrah Jones (Demographic Analysis of a Looted Late Intermediate Period Tomb, Chincha Valley, Peru). Also discusses research reports by David Chicoine, Beverly Clement, and Kyle Stich (Macrobotanical Remains from the 2009 Season at Caylan: Preliminary Insights into Early Horizon Plant Use in the Nepena Valley, North-Central Coast of Peru); by Catherine M. Bencic (Obsidian Technology at the Wari Site of Conchopata in Ayacucho, Peru); by Alejandro Chu (Incahuasi, Canete); by Monica Barnes (Luis Barreda Murillo's Excavations at Huanuco Pampa, 1965), by Simon Urbina, Leonor Adan, Constanza Pellegrino, and Estefania Vidal (Early Village Formation in Desert Areas of Tarapaca, Northern Chile [Eleventh Century B.C.--Thirteenth Century A.D.), and by Alina Alvarez Larrain (Don Mateo-El Cerro, a Newly Rediscovered Late Period Settlement in Yocavil (Catamarca, Argentina). Discusses obituaries of Donald Frederick Sola by Monica Barnes, and Paulina Mercedes Ledergerber-Crespo by A. Jorge Arellano-Lopez, and Death Notices of Robert Ascher, Bernd Lambert, Daniel W. Gade, and George Bankes by Monica Barnes and Bill Sillar.
Editor's Preface, Andean Past 11
Andean Past, 2013
Andean Past 11 includes work by Carlos Delgado González on archaeological evidence for feasts in Cusco, by Javier Fonseca Santa Cruz and Brian Bauer on dating the Wari remains at Espíritu Pampa in Vilcabamba, by Joel Grossman on new dates associated with early gold found at Waywaka, Andahuaylas, by Gregory D. Lockard on archaeological evidence for social differentiation among late Moche households at the Galindo site, by Yuichi Matsumoto, Yuri Cavero Palomino, and Roy Guíterrez Silva on Initial Period and Early Horizon domestic occupation of Capanayuq Rumi, by Patrick Carmichael on regionalism in the Nasca style, by Gregory Zaro, Kenneth Nystrom, and David Keefer on environmental catastrophe in south coastal Peru, and by Nicole Fuenzalida and Francisco Gallardo on exchange and ritual funerary consumption among hunter-gatherers of Chile’s Taltal coast. In addition there is a special memorial section honoring Betty Meggers by Monica Barnes, William Woods, and Robert Carneiro as well as obituaries of Alberto Rex González, Duccio Bonavia, and Daniel Shea. There are research reports by Joel Grossman, Monica Barnes, and Claudio Javier Patané Aráoz,
Andean Past Andean Past Volume 13 Andean Past 13 Article 11
THE SETTLEMENT HISTORY OF THE LUCRE BASIN (CUSCO, PERU), 2022
Bauer, Brian S.; Silva, Miriam Araoz; and Hardy, Thomas John (2022) "The Settlement History of the Lucre Basin (Cusco, Peru)," Andean Past: Vol. 13, Article 11. Available at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/andean\_past/vol13/iss1/11
Editor's Preface, Andean Past 10
Andean Past, 2012
Andean Past 10 contains an article on Fromative craft specialization in Bolivia’s Cochabamba Valleys by Olga Gabelmann, an analysis of Moche architectural vessels by Juliet Wiersema, a description of an excavated Moche well at the Huaca Cao Viejo in Peru’s Chicama Valley by Jeffrey Quilter and colleagues, inferences about Moche and Chimu labor organization from bricks by Howard Tsai, a bioarchaeological study of coca use by Melissa Murphy and María Fernanda Boza, a reconstruction of the destruction of the neo-Inca Yurac Rumi shrine in Vilcabamba by Brian S. Bauer, Miriam Dayde Aráoz, and George S. Burr, a report on storage and accounting facilities at Pachacamac by Peter Eeckhout, and a reconstruction of regional associations from ceramic data recovered in the Llanos de Mojos by John H. Walker. There are also obituaries of Earl Lubensky by Deborah Pearsall and of Juan Schobinger by Constanza Ceruti. The volume includes research reports by Jason Toohey, by Monica Barnes and colleagues, by Yuichi Matsumoto et al., by Jason Nesbitt, by David Chicoine and Carol Rojas, by Simón Urbina et al., and by Julián Salazar.
Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 14: Lenguas y sociedades en el antiguo Perú: hacia un enfoque interdisciplinario. , 2011
(RESUMEN EN CASTELLANO MÁS ABAJO) ABSTRACT (IN ENGLISH) This book emerges from the conference 'Lenguas y sociedades en el antiguo Perú: hacia un enfoque interdisciplinario', a gathering of linguists, archaeologists and anthropologists at the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú in August 2009. This chapter sets out first the raison d’être of our enterprise: why it seemed so important to foster a meeting of minds between these disciplines, to converge their disparate but complementary perspectives into a more coherent Andean prehistory. Next, it is asked how linguistics can inform us about prehistory at all, exploring some general methodological principles and how they might be applied specifically in the case of the Andes. The ‘traditional model’ for associating the linguistic and archaeological records in the Andes is then reviewed — but pointing also to various inherent infelicities, which duly call for a far reaching, interdisciplinary reconsideration of the Andean past. Here, therefore, we attempt to sum up the new state of the cross-disciplinary art in Andean prehistory, as collectively represented by the papers that emerged both from the Lima conference and from the symposium that preceded it, held at the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research at the University of Cambridge in September 2008. Progress and new perspectives are explored first on key individual questions. Who, for instance, were the Incas, and whence and when did they come to Cuzco? How and when did Quechua, too, reach Cuzco, as well as its furthest flung outposts in north-west Argentina, Ecuador and northern Peru? Finally, the scope is broadened to overall scenarios for how the main Andean language families might correlate in time and space with the archaeological horizons that in principle might best account for their dispersals. Four basic hypotheses have emerged, whose respective strengths and weaknesses are assessed in turn: a traditional ‘Wari as Aymara’ model, revised and defended; alternative proposals of ‘Wari as both Aymara and Quechua’, a suggestion of ‘both Chavín and Wari as Quechua’; and the most radical new departure, ‘Wari as Quechua, Chavín as Aymara’." RESUMEN (EN CASTELLANO) Arqueología, lenguas y el pasado andino: principios, metodología y el nuevo estado de la cuestión El presente volumen resulta del simposio «Lenguas y sociedades en el antiguo Perú: hacia un enfoque interdisciplinario», una reunión de lingüistas, arqueólogos y antropólogos realizada en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú en agosto de 2009. La presente contribución expone primero la razón de ser de nuestra iniciativa: el por qué nos parecía tan importante promover un encuentro entre estas disciplinas, con el objeto de hacer converger sus perspectivas dispares —pero, por lo tanto, complementarias— para avanzar hacia una prehistoria andina más coherente. Seguidamente, preguntamos cómo es que la lingüística está en condiciones de proveernos datos sobre la prehistoria. Primero examinamos algunos principios metodológicos generales a tal fin, antes de examinar cómo estos se dejan aplicar mejor en el caso específico de los Andes. A continuación, pasamos revista al «modelo tradicional» de las supuestas asociaciones entre los registros lingüísticos y arqueológicos en la región, señalando al paso varios desaciertos inherentes, los mismos que claman por una reconsideración profunda e interdisciplinaria del pasado andino. Por lo tanto, este artículo prosigue con el propósito de resumir el nuevo estado interdisciplinario de la cuestión de la prehistoria andina, tal como lo representan los artículos que resultaron tanto del encuentro de Lima como del simposio que le precedió, llevado a cabo en el McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research de la University of Cambridge en septiembre de 2008. Se analizan, en primer lugar, los avances y nuevas perspectivas sobre algunos temas específicos, entre ellos: ¿quiénes fueron los incas, de dónde procedían y cuándo llegaron al Cuzco?, ¿cómo y cuándo alcanzó el quechua el Cuzco, así como sus más alejados puestos de avanzada en el noroeste de Argentina, Ecuador y el norte del Perú? Por último, ampliamos nuestro alcance a escenarios generales que buscan correlacionar, en el tiempo y el espacio, las principales familias lingüísticas de los Andes con los horizontes arqueológicos que, en principio, mejor podrían explicar sus dispersiones. Han surgido cuatro hipótesis básicas, cuyos respectivos puntos fuertes y débiles pasamos a evaluar: el modelo tradicional, ahora revisado y defendido, de «Wari como aimara»; y propuestas alternativas de «Wari como aimara y quechua a la vez», «Chavín y Wari como quechua», y —más radical aún respecto al modelo tradicional— «Wari como quechua, Chavín como aimara».