Class Analysis and National Self-Determination: The Anti-Zionist Left in Israel/Palestine (original) (raw)

The Persistence of the Jewish Question in Socialist Struggle Rethinking Global Antisemitism and Emancipatory Universality

Shofar: , 2024

This article begins with a simple question: what is the situation of Jews today in socialist struggle? On this point, the article interrogates rhetorics of anti-Zionism, arguing that this strategy coincides with an abandonment of Left struggles against antisemitism, overlapping with the abandonment of universality and a materialist dialectic. Drawing principally on Jean-Paul Sartre's essay Anti-Semite and Jew, as well as Slavoj Žižek's critique of populist rhetoric on the Left, the article develops a materialist strategy for conceiving various forms of antisemitism on both the Right and the Left. The article takes inspiration from Marx's defense of universal human emancipation in his essay "On the Jewish Question," as well as Lenin's defense of national liberation and selfdetermination in the form of the political state, as a way to center the struggle against antisemitism in a materialist way, and in the context of extant global liberalism and capitalism. The position defended here does not abandon the question of Palestinian national liberation and selfdetermination in the form of a Palestinian nation-state. Rather, the article defends, in conclusion, the two-state option as a conduit for building a single, confederated, binational state in Israel-Palestine, as a materialist, internationalist, and socialist solution to the problems of antisemitism and Palestinian oppression in Israel and the West Bank. The article, however, calls for a return to a materialist analysis of antisemitism on the Left, via a critique of Left populist anti-Zionism.

Settler Colonial Studies Colonialism and imperialism in Communist thinking in Palestine/Israel, 1919–1965

ABSTRACT The history of Communism in Palestine/Israel can be seen as an attempt to effect an Arab-Jewish anti-imperialist struggle. This article – which is informed by the literature about settler colonialism and Palestinian nationalism – portrays the way in which local Communists viewed nationalism, Zionism and imperialism. It argues that Palestinian and Jewish Communists did not fully comprehend Zionist settler colonialism and Palestinian nationalism

Derek J. Penslar, “Anti-Semites on Zionism: From Indifference to Obsession,” Journal of Israeli History, vol. 25, no. 1 (March 2006): 13-31

This article compares European and Middle Eastern anti-Semitism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. From the 1870s through the 1930s, in parallel fashion anti-Semitism became a mobilizing, all-embracing ideology in Europe, while the Arab world witnessed an eruption of anticolonial and nationalist sentiment, often directed against the Zionist project. Arab anti-Semitism featured the irrational and fantastic qualities of its European counterpart, but it took form against the reality of the Zionist project. The article draws a distinction between the realms of systemic intolerance, aggravated by socio-economic crisis, and political strife, driven by discrete events and policies. Its main sources are fin-de-siècle European anti-Semites' writings on Zionism, which are shown to be fundamentally different from the anti-Zionist rhetoric emanating from the Middle East at that time.

The arithmetic of rights: Zionist intellectuals imagining the Arab minority May–July 1938

Middle Eastern Studies, 2018

This article examines Zionist debates regarding the status of the Arab minority in the Jewish State following the Royal Commission's recommendation to partition Palestine. Three conclusions arise from the debates: first, that the Zionist leadership regarded the civil and political rights of the Arab minority to be dependent on the power equilibrium between Jews and Arabs in all of Palestine. Second, the Zionist leaders imagined the Jewish State as a parliamentary democracy, but argued that a democratic regime should be created only after a Jewish majority had been achieved. Finally, because democracy in the Jewish State – including minority rights – was dependent on the creation of a Jewish majority, Zionist plans to transfer Arabs out of the Jewish State were not considered by them to be undemocratic, but rather a precondition to the creation of a Jewish and democratic state.