SCHOLARLY PERIODICALS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE BIOMEDICAL FIELD (original) (raw)
Related papers
Sozial- und Präventivmedizin SPM, 1992
This analysis focused on nine hundred and forty three articles .published in the Swiss Journal of Social and Preventive Medicine (Sozial-und Pr/iventivmedizin/Journal de M6decine sociale et pr6ventive). The aim was to present a descriptive image of the principal characteristics of the work published in the field of social and preventive medicine and public health, and then to analyse certain trends, which we hope will be useful in the future orientation of research. To date, no other studies have analysed the articles published in the Journal. The present journal evolved from the Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft fi~r Gesundheitspflege first published in Zurich in 1900. It underwent many changes of title and fusions with other journals to become, in 1956, the Review of Preventive Medicine 1, with the aim of addressing "all the questions concerning preventive medicine" 2. In ] 974, it adopted the new title of Journal of Social and Preventive Medicine and became the official journal of the Swiss Society of Social and Preventive Medicine (SSMSP). The journal publishes papers on original scientific research (studies), review articles, abstracts of scientific meetings of the SSMSP, letters to the editor, and announcements of upcoming congresses. It appears six times a year with articles in German, French and English, with abstracts in all three languages. Since 1987, the studies and review articles of the Journal have been cited in the Medline data base. Since January l, 1988, the SSMSP has collaborated with the German Society of Social Medicine and Prevention 3. At this time, a new editorial policy emphasizing originality, pertinence, structure and clarity was announced 4. Therefore all articles submitted for publication are reviewed by an editorial committee of scientific experts in order to improve the overall quality of the Journal, and a majority of the presentations at the scientific meetings of the SSMSP are published only as abstracts. Methods All issues of the Journal from 1980 to 1990 inclusive (Volumes 25-35) were examined. Not only were the studies recorded, but also the review articles, editorials, abstracts, and posters, all of which were
Ten Steps to Improve Quality of the Journal Materia Socio-Medica
Materia Socio Medica, 2017
is one of the oldest public health journals in Europe, established in 1978, and among the most important journals for public health in SouthEastern Europe. The Journal covers all important public health professional, academic and research areas in this fi eld. The aim of the paper is to analyze the journal articles and statistical facts in 2016 and to point out the directions for action and planned further activities for improving the quality of the published papers and visibility of the journal. Methods: Review and analysis of documentation and production of the journal, evidence of submitted and rejected manuscripts and published papers in 2016. Results: Total number of 111 articles was published in Materia Socio-Medica during 2016. The most of them were original articles (64,5%). Articles from the fi elds of Health promotion and prevention were predominant (82,7%), which is one of the primary scope of the journal. Authors of the published articles in 2016 are dispersed to three continents (Europe, Asia and North America) and 15 diff erent countries. The largest number of articles was submitted by authors from the country of origin of the journal, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The acceptance rate of Materia Socioi-Medica in 2016 was 35.7%. Total number of 116 reviewers participated in the manuscript review process in 2016. Conclusion: Materia Socio-Medica will continue to improve the quality of the published papers in 2017 and beyond through education of potential authors, reviewers and Editorial Board members, quality selection of reviewers, supportive editing of articles, and clearly defi ning instructions and ethical standards of the journal.
How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine
Air Medical Journal, 1998
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. The contents of this work are intended to further general scientific research, understanding, and discussion only and are not intended and should not be relied upon as recommending or promoting a specific method, diagnosis, or treatment by health science practitioners for any particular patient. The publisher and the author make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of medicines, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each medicine, equipment, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. Readers should consult with a specialist where appropriate. The fact that an organization or Website is referred to in this work as a citation and/or a potential source of further information does not mean that the author or the publisher endorses the information the organization or Website may provide or recommendations it may make. Further, readers should be aware that Internet Websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. No warranty may be created or extended by any promotional statements for this work. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any damages arising herefrom.
Çeviri/Translation, 2018
Key element 1 (BACKGROUND): the point of the research-why should we care about the study? This is usually a statement of the BIG problem that the research helps to solve and the strategy for helping to solve it. It prepares the reader to understand the specific research question. Key element 2 (OBJECTIVES): the specific research question-the basis of credible science. To be clear, complete and concise, research questions are stated in terms of relationships between the variables that were investigated. Such specific research questions tie the story togetherthey focus on credible science. Key element 3 (METHODS): a precise description of the methods used to collect data and determine the relationships between the variables. Key element 4 (RESULTS): the major findings-not only data, but the RELATIONSHIPS found that lead to the answer. Results should generally be reported in the past tense but the authors' interpretation of the factual findings is in the present tense-it reports the authors' belief of how the world IS. Of course, in a pilot study such as the following example, the authors cannot yet present definitive answers, which they indicate by using the words "suggest" and "may".
RESEARCH-Guidelines Version 2 0
Find a subject you care about and which your heart feel others should care about. It is this genuine caring, not your games with language, which will be the most compelling and seductive element in your style.