Key elements of interprofessional education. Part 2: Factors, processes and outcomes (original) (raw)
Related papers
Key elements of interprofessional education Part 2: Factors and processes and outcomes
2005
In the second paper of this two part series on Key Elements of Interprofessional Education (IPE), we highlight factors for success in IPE based on a systematic literature review conducted for Health Canada in its ‘‘Interprofessional Education for Patient Centred Practice’ ’ (IECPCP) initiative in Canada (Oandasan et al., 2004). The paper initially discusses micro (individual level) meso (institutional/organizational level) and macro (socio-cultural and political level) factors that can influence the success of an IPE initiative. The discussion provides the infrastructure for the introduction of a proposed framework for educators to utilize in the planning and implementation of an IPE program to enhance a learner’s opportunity to become a collaborative practitioner. The paper also discusses key issues related to the evaluation of IPE and its varied outcomes. Lastly, it gives the reader suggestions of outcome measurements that can be used within the proposed IPE framework.
Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2005
This paper is the first of two that highlights key elements needed for consideration in the planning and implementation of interprofessional educational (IPE) interventions at both the pre and postlicensure qualification education levels. There is still much to be learned about the pedagogical constructs related to IPE. Part 1 of this series discusses the learning context for IPE and considers questions related to the ''who, what, where, when and how'' related to IPE. Through a systematic literature review that was conducted for Health Canada in its move to advance Interprofessional Education for Patient Centred Practice (IECPCP), this paper provides background information that can be helpful for those involved in an interprofessional initiative. A historical review of IPE sets the international context for this area and reflects the work that has been done and is currently being initiated and implemented to advance IPE for health professional students. Much can be learned from the literature related to the pedagogical approaches that have been tried and the issues that need to be addressed related to the learner, the educator and the learning context which this paper examines.
Journal of Research in …, 2009
Background: Interest in interprofessional education (IPE) to promote effective interprofessional collaboration (IPC) has gained momentum across healthcare, professional education, and government sectors. In general, the IPE literature tends to report single-site studies. This article presents a rare study that reports a largescale multi-site IPE initiative. It draws upon a newly developed notion of mainstreaming-introduced to the literature by Barr and Ross-that helps illuminate the implementation issues related to an IPE initiative.
Challenges and opportunities in interprofessional education and practice
The Lancet, 2022
The Health Policy paper by Julio Frenk and colleagues1 in The Lancet on educating health professionals after the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the post-pandemic learning environment, use of technology to improve learning, interprofessional education (IPE), and lifelong continuing education and training for the health professions. The perpetual shortage and maldistribution of health professionals within complex health systems and unmet population health needs may require innovative approaches for the education of health professionals for effective practice. IPE is an educational approach that could positively influence health-care practices and patient outcomes. With its origins in the 1960s, predominantly in the UK and the USA, IPE has since spread to various regions of the world.2 The application of IPE in different regions and countries varies, ranging from a uniprofessional approach to a seamless incorporation of IPE to the whole learning environment. WHO defines IPE as occasions where students from two or more professions in health and social care learn from, about, and with each other during their education for effective collaboration in future practice.3 The Interprofessional Education Collaborative proposes four essential competencies for IPE: values and ethics, roles and responsibilities, interprofessional communication, and teamwork and team-based care.4 These are predicated on each profession also being trained to a high level of knowledge and skill in its own right.
Interprofessional education development: A road map for getting there
Open Journal of Nursing, 2013
To improve clinician relationships, the relationship development process is best initiated during health professional education, rather than "refitting" the interrelationship model learned during the health education process. While Interprofessional Education (IPE) has been identified as an effective model to fill the gap for both education and practice, IPE requires moving to an integrative curricular approach with a strong practice component. As a developmental process, IPE implementation faces challenges at every stage. The Interprofessional Education Development: The Roadmap for Getting There article describes the five stages of IPE, discusses important components of creating an IPE culture, suggests strategies for overcoming the challenges for each stage, and describes signs related to achievement of the five developmental stages of IPE.
Interprofessional education and collaborative practice in Primary Health Care
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2015
Objective To understand the perceptions of professors, health care providers and students about the articulation of interprofessional education with health practices in Primary Health Care. Method To understand and interpret qualitative data collection, carried out between 2012 and 2013, through semi-structured interviews with 18 professors and four sessions of homogeneous focus groups with students, professors and health care providers of Primary Health Care. Results A triangulation of the results led to the construction of two categories: user-centered collaborative practice and barriers to interprofessional education. The first perspective indicates the need to change the model of care and training of health professionals, while the second reveals difficulties perceived by stakeholders regarding the implementation of interprofessional education. Conclusion The interprofessional education is incipient in the Brazil and the results of this analysis point out to possibilities of cha...