Coastal State Competences Regarding Safety of Maritime Navigation: recent trends (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Peculiarities of Exercising State Jurisdiction at the High Seas
The high seas are not only one of the major areas of the world's ocean, but also a source of many lucrative resources, which may be used by all states, whether coastal or landlocked , under the freedom of the high seas which is a general principle of international law. However, the principle is not unconditional as the activities of states at the high seas are subject to the regulations prescribed under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Equality of states operating at the high seas leads to the exclusivity of the flag state jurisdiction and the principle of non-interdiction of its vessels. Nevertheless, UNCLOS foresees exceptions to the jurisdiction of flag states. The article analyses, inter alia, the preconditions of exercising flag state jurisdiction, the possibilities and peculiarities of non-state actor interference particularly regarding cases of piracy and pre-emptive self-defence.
The Fundamental Legal Notion and Codification of the International Law of the Sea
Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development
The development of the public international law of the sea is considered a legal element inseparable from the historical-legal process of the adoption and development of international law in general. Although the basic concepts of general maritime legislation are found in the customary maritime law of ancient Rome and Greece, as well as in the rules of medieval maritime codes created by Hispanic, Italian, and English city-states between the 11th and XVth centuries in Europe, the law of the sea in the contemporary sense of the term, was adopted as a result of interrelations between European states with maritime interests during the period known as the modern or post-medieval era of history. International law of the sea, as it is considered today, developed only when the necessity of the creation of independent territorial states enabled the true development of international relations in Europe. This radical change in the international system, the beginnings of which can be found in t...
THE BOARDERS OF THE COASTAL STATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL LEGISLATIONS
ABSTRACT States have always had access to seas and the governments of these states always had important interests, that grew throughout history, to be achieved in the coastal areas close to these states, such as the growth of the world trade, and the need to guard these waters against smuggling that deprives the states from revenues, and also to control and implement regulations on health, migration, exclusive rights of fishing, mining and natural resources, using touristic sights, and organizing the fleets defending the state. And it’s one of the most critical factors affecting the use of the commercial, as well as military and technological power of the state. The research problem is the competition for the control over coastal seas, and allegations of marine areas and international waters. Taking into consideration recent international changes and amendments of the international rules and especially the study of coastal state authorities, as well as maritime law and the authorities given to the state in accordance with the international rules and regulations to recognize its own sovereignty over coastal waters, in addition to the sovereign rights and duties along the coast line on innocent passage. The aim of this research is to review the concept of sea expansion and measure all maritime areas which allow a coastal state to extend its mandate, and utilizing it efficiently economically and strategically in accordance with international the maritime law and its provisions. This research adopts the analytical approach in general, and the historical and realistic narrative approach in brief by explaining and analysing all the international conventions and treaties, laws, rules, as well as comparisons resulting from experience and recent studies in that content.
Journal of Defence Studies, 2013
This article analyses the alteration of the referent object for maritime security from protection of shipping and port facilities to protection of citizens and national economies. It presents a tentative answer on the extent and consequences of this alteration applied by states in a global perspective, and focuses on validating four explanatory factors on why the alteration has occurred. The time period of study is between 1991 and 2013. Its results illustrate a transition in states' security policies from traditional expressions of maritime security to broader security perspectives, and also indicates radically altered maritime strategic perspectives among states. IntroductIon The maritime domain's value for states can be described in terms of its natural resources, its importance for transport and trade, power projection and defence, and the marine environment's inherent value. 1 Consequently, social, economic, law enforcement and security interests converge and interact in this domain. Government and private interests are mixed with varying degrees of governmental, inter-and supra-national regulation and control, whose effectiveness are dependent on the coordination and interaction between the domain's stakeholders. Maritime policies have
The Concept of Maritime Governance in International Relations
Intenrational Relations, 2019
The aim of the article 1 is the identification of components of maritime governance and evolution of the concept of maritime governance in contemporary International Relations. The main research questions are: what elements constitute the structure of maritime governance and why the role of maritime governance is increasing in the policy of super and regional powers. The answer to these questions will be used to verify the adopted hypothesis which indicates that maritime governance is a dynamic process consisting of interdependent areas of legal regulations, blue economy, security and environmental elements. Their horizontal and vertical interdependence and interrelation while dealing with oceans make maritime governance necessary instrument for super and regional powers to attain their interests. Based on the presented assumptions and purpose, the following structure of the article was adopted. The introduction highlights the role of oceans in the world affairs and presents research questions and hypothesis. In the second part of the article main stages of discourse on maritime governance are discussed and characterized, putting emphasis on the process of shaping its conceptual and terminological framework. Methodological differences and similarities in defining maritime governance are explored. The third part indicates the operational dimension of the concept of maritime governance, presenting the stages of the process of institutionalization of maritime cooperation between states. Finally, the case study of the Integrated Maritime Policy of the European Union is presented to serve as an exemplification of the modern maritime governance. The conclusion of the article contains answers to the research questions posed.
Ocean Development and International Law, 2021
Article 234 of UNCLOS is in many ways exceptional, but it is not unique in the sense that it grants to the coastal state "complete" legislative power. Arguably, "complete" coastal state jurisdiction exists in the territorial sea for the purposes enumerated in Article 21(1), allowing coastal states to adopt ship reporting systems, pilotage, and other routing measures unilaterally. The analysis of state practice reveals that states often decide to engage the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in different ways, even when such a course of action is not mandatory. This article advocates for meaningful deliberation as both a suitable method of meeting Article 234's due regard standard, and a practice that can be expected from a steward.
International Law of the Sea: An Overlook and Case Study
Sea is a large body of water that is surrounded by the land. It is a crucial part of human trade and commerce, voyage, mineral extraction, power generation and is also considered as an essential source of blue economy nowadays. International law of the sea is a law of maritime space that peacefully settles the global disputes on maritime boundary between or among the States and defines various jurisdictions of the maritime zones as well as the rights and obligations of the coastal States in these zones, especially with regard to the conservation of marine environment and biodiversity. The key objective of this piece of academic research is to demonstrate a brief overview of the international law of the sea with a special emphasize on the sources and legal framework of this law. This study also strives to focus the civil and criminal liability, jurisdictions, rights and obligations of the coastal states with regard to the different maritime zones. Furthermore this study delineates the rules and extent of using these maritime zones in the light of various treaty provisions on the international law of the sea where different adjudicated cases are also presented along with a profound scrutiny upon their fact, issues, judgment and reasoning.
Maritime Sovereignty, Rights, and Cooperation
Coast Guards and Ocean Politics in the Arctic, 2019
Maritime issues have been climbing the political agendas since the early 2000s. This chapter explores the foundational background for how and why states acquired rights at sea in the first place, and how this fit with various conceptualisations of the maritime domain. It maps how states’ rights at sea came about more generally, and how the ocean differs from land in terms of sovereign rights and legal institutionalisation throughout the twentieth century. Concepts such as ocean governance, territorial waters, the EEZ and the continental shelf, as well as UNCLOS (Law of the Sea), are explained and discussed. Finally, this chapter turns to examine how and why states cooperate at sea, based on theories from the field of international relations.