Point prevalence of alcoholism in hospitalized patients: continuing challenges of detection, assessment, and diagnosis (original) (raw)
Related papers
Prevalence and routine assessment of unhealthy alcohol use in hospitalized patients
European Journal of Internal Medicine, 2010
Objectives: To determine the prevalence of alcohol misuse among medical inpatients and the methods used by medical staff to evaluate alcohol consumption. Methods: Multicenter, prospective, observational, cross-sectional study performed at 21 hospitals in Spain. All adult patients hospitalized in internal medicine wards on 12 March 2008 were eligible for study. Alcohol consumption was evaluated with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C and AUDIT) and the Systematic Inventory of Alcohol Consumption questionnaire. Drinking patterns were determined according to clinical evaluation using ICD-10 criteria. Medical records were reviewed to gather information on the recording of alcohol use. Results: We assessed 1039 inpatients, of whom 123 (12%) had unhealthy alcohol drinking patterns. Alcohol misuse was more frequent among males (odds ratio 5.20), younger patients (odds ratio, 14.17), median age patients (odds ratio, 2.99), and South Region (odds ratio, 1.77). Alcohol use during hospitalization was recorded in 603 inpatients (59%); quantitative records were performed in 28% of hazardous and harmful drinkers and in 41% of dependent patients. Lack of alcohol use recording was more frequent among females (odds ratio 1.73), median and older age groups (odds ratios 1.44 and 1.73, respectively), Northwest Regions (odds ratios 3.46). Patients from the East Region (odds ratio 0.47) had more frequently assessed the question in their medical records. Conclusions: Prevalence of alcohol misuse was higher in hospitalized patients than in the general population. Adequate quantitative recording was infrequent. We stress the need to implement measures to increase and improve the detection and recording of alcohol use.
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 1998
Little Is known about the utility of collateral reports in substantiating self-report for individuals assessed in nonalcoholism treatment contexts. This study examined the concordance of 581 pairs of medical patient and collateral responses to a commonly used alcohol screening instrument, the CAGE Questions, as well as to reports of the patient's drinking consequences and alcohol consumption. Results demonstrated that patientkollateral concordance was marginal, but acceptable, on CAGE cut-off scores and, that similar to reports from alcoholism treatment settings, patients generally repofied more drinking consequences than collaterals. Patient and collateral reports of the patient's alcohol consumption did not differ significantly. This pattern of patient and collateral reporting of alcohol consequences and consumption was found for both men and women, as well as for patients with a DSM-Ill-R diagnosis of alcohol dependence. The findings support the validity of patient self-report on alcoholism screening measures in medical settings. Furthermore, results demonstrated that the addition of collateral reports to information directly obtained from patients only modestly improved the Identification of alcohol dependence. The overall findings indicate that alcohol screening can be done effectively and efficiently in medical settings.
General Hospital Psychiatry, 2004
Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are common among inpatients in general hospitals and often cause excess mortality. This study investigates the prevalence of AUDs among nonpsychiatric inpatients in one general hospital and evaluates the ability of medical staff to identify such morbidity. A two-phase case-identification strategy was employed utilizing the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test as the first-phase screening tool and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry as the second-phase diagnostic interview. Among 538 eligible patients, a total of 422 (78.4%) completed the first-phase screening. A subsample (20%) of those screened negative and 90% of those screened positive were interviewed at the second phase. The weighted 1-year prevalence rates of alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence were 3.9% and 12.6%, respectively. The overall identification rate of AUDs by medical staff was 25.4% (0% for alcohol abuse and 30% for alcohol dependence). In conclusion, approximately one sixth of nonpsychiatric inpatients in a general hospital have AUDs and have been neglected substantially by medical staff. Implications of the findings for the prevention of AUDs and their physical complications are discussed.
General Hospital Psychiatry, 2001
Previous research may have underestimated physicians' detection rates of alcohol dependence or abuse because case findings have been based on screening questionnaires instead of using in-depth diagnostic criteria and detection rates have been assessed by analyzing patient records instead of directly interviewing the physician. To test this hypothesis, consecutive patients of a general hospital (Nϭ436) and of 12 randomly selected general practices (Nϭ929) were examined. A two-step diagnostic procedure included screening questionnaires and a diagnostic interview (SCAN). The analysis compares detection rates based on methods used in previous studies to data using more precise methods. Physicians' detection rates ranged from 37.0% to 88.9% in the general hospital and from 11.1% to 74.7% in general practices depending on methods used. The physicians' detection rates could be improved by 10% (general hospital) and 20% (general practice) through the additional use of a screening questionnaire. Of those patients assessed by the physicians as problem drinkers in the general hospital, 13.9% were referred to an addiction consultation-liaison service. Data reveal that physicians' abilities to detect problem drinkers have been underestimated. Routine screening procedures could play a major role in improving detection rates and reminding the physician to intervene.
The detection of alcohol problems in a primary care clinic
Journal of Community Health, 1992
The CAGE is a four item questionnaire which is used to help clinicians identify alcohol problems. Charts of 433 primary care patients who were given a medical health form containing the CAGE questions (experimental patients) were compared with charts of 451 patients given a similar form that did not contain the CAGE questions (control patients). Alcohol problems were detected more frequently in the experimental patients (10.6%) than in the control patients (6.7%) (p<0.05). This difference in detection tended to be most evident for persons with milder alcohol problems (problem drinking) as opposed to more well developed alcohol abuse. Experimental patients (3.7%) also tended to be more likely than control patients (2.9%) to receive active alcohol treatment during their initial medical visit. Medical health screening forms which include the CAGE questions may promote the identification of alcohol problems in primary care.
Two Brief Alcohol-Screening Tests From the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
Archives of Internal Medicine, 2003
Background: Primary care physicians need a brief alcohol questionnaire that identifies hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorders. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questions 1 through 3 (AUDIT-C), and AUDIT question 3 alone are effective alcohol-screening tests in male Veterans Affairs (VA) patients, but have not been validated in women.