(2011) What finalité politique for the European Neighbourhood Policy? On Objectives and Instruments of EU Relations with its Neighbourhood (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks, 2017
The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy 'At a moment when the EU is once again reviewing its signature European Neighbourhood Policy, this book is instructive in assessing the last revision to this strategy in 2011. Bouris and Schumacher have assembled an interestingly eclectic mix of contributions, many of which offer useful perspectives somewhat different from standard accounts of EU foreign policy. The volume sheds light on why the promised ENP upgrade went awry and failed to divert the crises with which the EU now grapples to its east and south.'-Richard Youngs, Professor of International Relations, University of Warwick, UK 'This expansive set of chapters clarifies the urgency and complexity involved in the EU's revised policy for engagement with the Union's southern and eastern neighborhoods. Conceptually sophisticated and empirically rich, the book tackles the ontological ambivalence, normative tensions, and operational challenges in the EU's Revised ENP, leaving no doubt about the inextricable, reflexive linkages between the future of the EU and developments in countries to the south and east.'-Elizabeth H. Prodromou, Visiting Associate Professor of Conflict Resolution, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, USA 'Dimitris Bouris' and Tobias Schumacher's book will become an indispensable read in the study of the ENP. It provides a major new critical synthesis of the Union's relations with its immediate neighbours in the framework of the revised ENP of 2011. This is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand the ENP's subsequent reviews and thus the EU's evolving foreign policy towards its 'near abroad'.'-Sharon Pardo, Jean Monnet Chair ad personam-Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel 'The neighbourhood is crucial to the future of the EU, in terms of not only security, but also and especially governance, sustainable development and social equality. The authors in this volume draw on their unique expertise to unpack the key issues and highlight what has changed and what needs changing in the European stance.'-Federica Bicchi, Associate Professor
The European Union and its Neighbourhood: Time for a Rethink
On 7 May 2009 leading policy-makers from the European Union (EU) are scheduled to hold a high-level meeting with political leaders from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine (see map on p. 2) in order to launch a new Eastern Partnership (EaP). It is high time for EU policy-makers to renew and to reinvigorate the relationships with these east European neighbours, as indeed with the southern neighbours (the subject of a parallel initiative to develop the Union for the Mediterranean). The European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) had run its course in its previous format. The EU (further) enlargement policy is running up against problems. However, the content of the EaP has so far been sketched only in outline. It has been launched at what has turned out to be a difficult moment, given the political turmoil inside some of the target countries. Much more thought -and imagination needs to be given to how to reshape these relationships and to which tools are needed for the job. In particular:
In Need of a New Paradigm? Rethinking the European Neighbourhood Policy/Eastern Partnership
Eastern Partnership Review No.20, 2015
Over the past decade, the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) has become much more than the policy framework governing the European Union’s relations with adjacent regions. Given the multifaceted and daunting challenges faced by Eastern European, South Caucasus and Southern Mediterranean countries, the neighbourhood has actually emerged as a major test for the EU’s foreign policy as a whole. With the ENP, the EU has responded by projecting to the neighbourhood its own governance and model of economic integration – widely seen as building blocks of prosperity and peace across the continent. By providing guidance for domestic reforms, EU’s rules and policy templates were expected to bring about prosperity, stability and security in the neighbourhood. However, recent developments across the region suggest that the EU has only partially been able to take up the challenge. This is not only because the motto of a more prosperous and democratic neighbourhood has not materialised. In fact, over the past few years the EU’s neighbourhood has turned into a much more unstable and insecure area, with conflicts de facto threatening regional security and postponing the colossal task of political and economic reforms. Taking into account altogether the EU’s level of ambition in the neighbourhood, regional realities and the toolbox available to the Union, what can be (and what should be) the exact scope of the changes to be introduced? Should the EU perform a complete overhaul of the ENP? How should the revised ENP look like? As the paper argues, the ENP needs a shift of paradigm. While also pursuing its own interests and promoting its values, the EU should de-centre the ENP from its own experience and better tailor its policies to partner countries’ needs and circumstances.
Assessing European Neighbourhood Policy: Perspectives from the Literature
Several events in the past few years have dramatically shown how the interests of European citizens are directly affected by the stability, security and prosperity of their neighbouring regions. At the same time, the European Union and its member states face many challenges and dilemmas in designing and pursuing policies that not only effectively promote these interests, but also build stronger partnerships with neighbouring countries based on the values on which the Union is founded. First the Arab revolts and then Russia's assertiveness in the eastern neighbourhood prompted reviews by the EU of its European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP), in 2011 and 2015, respectively. These reviews, in turn, have renewed scholarly interest in the ENP. By deliberately focusing on the recent literature (since 2011), this book by CEPS identifies the factors that explain the (lack of) effectiveness and coherence of the ENP. This exercise has resulted in a rich overview of and deep reflection on a wide variety of ENP-related themes, such as conditionality and leverage, the interests vs values dilemma and the role of third parties. The study identifies where there is consensus among scholars and where perspectives and judgements differ. It also identifies important gaps in the literature where further research is needed. This book will be of interest to a wide audience of officials, diplomats, parliamentarians, researchers at think tanks, civil society organisations, university teachers, trainers, students and journalists who want to know more about the challenges and dilemmas arising from the ENP. The work has been carried out by a team of researchers from CEPS in Brussels, with the support of the Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands.
IAI Working Papers, No. 14|16 (November 2014), ISBN 978-88-98650-21-7, 2014
The Arab uprisings alongside the Ukrainian crisis have triggered the perfect storm. The European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP), developed at the height of enlargement EU-phoria, is in tatters. To be fair, its failure is only partly endogenous, and largely due to the dramatic transformation of the neighbourhood - east and south - which no one could have foreseen at the turn of the century. Be that as it may, the EU will have to fundamentally rethink its approach towards its turbulent backyard. To move forward, the EU needs to devise conceptually different approaches to the east and south. In both cases, instability and crises abound. In both, the magnitude of the challenges that the EU faces is so great that down-to-earth realism must be its guiding light. Formulating and pursuing down-to-earth objectives for the neighbourhood that reflect current realities is not cynical. It is responsible.