Authoritarianism–conservatism–traditionalism: Evidence for the multidimensionality of threat-based ideological attitudes (original) (raw)

Abstract

Traditionally Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) has been seen as a unidimensional construct. Recently, however, researchers have begun to measure three distinct RWA dimensions Van Hiel, Cornelis, Roets, & De Clercq, 2006). One of these new multidimensional RWA approaches has conceptualized these three dimensions as Authoritarianism, Conservatism, and Traditionalism (ACT), which are viewed as expressions of basic social values or motivational goals that represent different, though related, strategies for attaining collective security at the expense of individual autonomy. Findings are reported from two studies to assess the validity and predictive utility of the multidimensional ACT approach. First, a direct cross-national comparison showed that the three ACT dimensions were reliable and factorially distinct and demonstrated the measurement invariance of the three latent constructs across Serbian and NZ (New Zealand) samples. The three ACT dimensions predicted self-reported behavior differentially in both samples, and a comparison of latent means showed the Serbian sample higher than the NZ sample on the ACT dimensions of Authoritarianism and Traditionalism but markedly lower on Conservatism. Second, a reanalysis of previously collected NZ data showed that the three ACT scales differentially predicted three dimensions of generalized prejudice in a theoretically meaningful manner. These findings underline the importance of studying ideological attitudes, such as RWA, multidimensionally.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (37)

  1. Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
  2. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  3. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
  4. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. Boston: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324-340.
  7. Bollen, K., & Long, J. (Eds). (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  8. Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  10. Duckitt, J. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10, 63-84.
  11. Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to Right-Wing Authoritarianism: The Authoritarianism-Conservatism-Traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685-715.
  12. Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199-222.
  13. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113-130.
  14. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice and politics: A dual process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861-1893.
  15. Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41-74.
  16. Flere, S., & Klanjšek, R. (2009). Cross-cultural insight into the association between religiousness and authoritarianism. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 31, 177-190.
  17. Funke, F. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195-218.
  18. Gregory, R. J. (2004). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  19. Hu, L., & Bentler, (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  20. Jugert, P., & Duckitt, J. (2009). A motivational model of authoritarianism: Integrating personal and situational determinants. Political Psychology, 30, 693-719.
  21. Kraus, S. (1995). Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58-75.
  22. Kreindler, S. (2005). A dual group processes model of individual differences in prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 90-107.
  23. Marsh, H. W. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 5-34.
  24. Meloen, J. (2000). The political culture or state authoritarianism. In S. Renshon & J. Duckitt (Eds.), Political psychology: Cultural and cross-cultural foundations (pp. 108-127). New York: New York University Press.
  25. Oswald, D. (2005). Understanding anti-Arab reactions post-9/11: The role of threats, social categories, and personal ideolo- gies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1775-1799.
  26. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., & Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
  27. Rigby, K. (1987). An authority behavior inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 615-625.
  28. Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 51-67.
  29. Schafer, J. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
  30. Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). San Diego: Academic Press.
  31. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Stellmacher, J., & Petzel, T. (2005). Authoritarianism as a group phenomenon. Political Psychology, 26, 245-274.
  33. Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.
  35. Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., Roets, A., & De Clrecq (2007). A comparison of various authoritarianism scales in Belgium Flanders. European Journal of Personality, 21, 149-168.
  36. Wicker, A. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41-78.
  37. Van Hiel, A., Duriez, B., & Kossowska, M. (2006). The presence of left-wing authoritarianism in Western Europe and its relationship with conservative ideology. Political Psychology, 27, 769-793.