Kurdistan Regional Government–Turkish energy relations: a complex partnership (original) (raw)
Related papers
Kurdistan’s role in European energy security
Journal of Geography, Politics and Society
The paper analyzes the Kurdistan Regional Government’s (KRG) natural resource strategies, such as how it deals with huge reserves of many trillion cubic feet of its natural gas as significant energy. Because natural gas belongs to the cleanest burning fossil fuels, with 30 percent less carbon than oil, it plays a role in the global fuel economy. As KRG transports its natural gas to international markets, like European countries, via Turkey it means they also participate in energy security as a new actor. Because the KRG is landlocked, strong factors may affect Kurdish natural gas strategies because KRG is surrounded by today’s partners and yesterday’s enemies politically and economically. Turkey, the neighbor of KRG, also buys its gas and has an influence on these strategies after the Ukraine crisis that pushed European countries to make a turn towards Caspian natural gas. Kurdistan is part of the best option for European energy security as it plans to diversify natural gas imports....
Turkey-KRG Energy Relations: Internal and External Dynamics
This paper aims at exploring internal and external dynamics of Turkey-KRG energy relations. It argues that Turkey's fight against the PKK, its increasing energy need, the target of Turkish energy decision-makers to decrease the high reliance of the country on Russian and Iranian gas, Turkey's goal of emerging as an energy hub, the economic interests of Turkish business groups, the strained relations between Ankara and Baghdad, and Erbil-Baghdad conflict have been the major determinants of Turkey's energy strategy towards the KRG. The paper concludes that the independence referendum held by the KRG in September 2017 has serious implications for the future of the Ankara-Erbil energy partnership, depending on measures to be taken by Kurdish and Iraqi leaders.
Middle Eastern Studies, 2017
The continuing dependency on fossil fuels of the Middle East not only in Turkey’s energy mix but also in world energy demand requires further analysis of oil and conflict in the region since the fall of Mosul in Iraq to ISIS in June 2014. This article addresses the relationship between oil and conflict. Then, it examines the case of Turkey’s increasing energy relations with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) to elucidate the implications of inter-state and intra-state conflict on regional interdependence in the region. The argument asserts that risks of an abrupt regime change or revolutionary regime formation in the aftermath of civil war in Syria and ethnic or sectarian violence in Iraq, which are highly associated with intra-state conflicts, present challenges for Turkey’s energy security and most importantly for human security in the region.
The Role of Energy Security in Turkish Foreign Policy (2004–2016)
Turkish Foreign Policy, 2017
Although pipeline projects and Turkey's geostrategic location between energy-rich countries in the Caspian and Middle East regions have been underlined in Turkish foreign policy for more than two decades, few studies have focused on the role of energy security in Turkey's foreign policy. This chapter examines how the role of energy security in Turkish foreign policy has been constructed since 2004-when the Strategy Paper Concerning Electricity Market Reform and Privatization was issued (HPC 2004). It argues that the role of energy security in Turkish foreign policy was constructed both by the foreign policy elite's normative principles about regional economic interdependence-which defined the social purpose of energy security based on their beliefs about Turkey's cultural and historical ties in its neighbourhood-and by the material interests shared within the alliance between the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, JDP) government and business in conjunction with neo-liberal regulatory reform in the Turkish energy sector. The chapter is divided into three sections. The first section 'Turkey's energy security and its asymmetric interdependence with gas suppliers' defines Turkey's energy-import dependency and highlights its puzzling asymmetric interdependence with gas suppliers. It also reviews early pipeline
Turkey in the Geopolitics of Energy
This article discusses how geography, energy markets and political developments determine Turkey’s role in the geopolitics of energy. Located strategically between two continents, Turkey has a desire of becoming an international physical hub and transit corridor for natural gas, while at the same time improving its own energy security. Domestic Turkish demand and market regulations, existing and new sources of supply, as well as internal and external economic, regulatory and political factors interplay in the realization of these goals. The article argues that the potential Turkey has to become a significant player in natural gas transit depends on the simultaneous developments of the domestic political situation and the great political uncertainties in its neighborhood. If market developments allow, Turkey may become a hub for Russian gas through the Western part of the country, and it may become a hub for gas from Central Asia and the Middle East while also serving its Middle and Eastern parts. The outcome depends on domestic decisions colored by the economics of natural gas transportation and political developments in its surroundings. Austvik, Ole Gunnar & Rzayeva, Gulmira, 2017: "Turkey in the Geopolitics of Energy". pdf-version. Energy Policy. London: Elsevier Science. DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.008. Volume 107. pp. 539-547
This chapter examines how the role of energy security in Turkish foreign policy has been constructed by ideational forces and material interests since 2004, when the Strategy Paper Concerning Electricity Market Reform and Privatization was issued. I argue that that the role of energy security in Turkish foreign policy was constructed both by the foreign policy elite’s normative principles about regional economic interdependence, which defined the social purpose of energy security based on the elite’s beliefs about Turkey’s cultural and historical ties in its neighbourhood, and by the material interests shared within the alliance between the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government and business in the conjunction of neoliberal regulatory reform in the Turkish energy sector. The chapter is divided into two sections. The first section defines Turkey’s energy-import dependency and highlights its puzzling asymmetric interdependence with gas suppliers. It also reviews early pipeline projects, which help us understand Turkey’s initial priorities and the related role of energy security in its foreign policy. The second section presents the interaction between ideational forces defining the social purpose of regional interdependence and material interests, which together have shaped the role of energy security in Turkey’s foreign policy. The last section concludes the chapter, and highlights the findings.
"Turkey's energy security in Eurasia"
Turkey's Pivot to Eurasia: Geopolitics and Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order, Seçkin Köstem and Emre Erşen (editors)' Routledge, 2019
This chapter aims to reassess the importance of Eurasia for Turkey’s energy security in light of the debate on the emergence of an alternative Eurasian orientation in Turkish foreign policy. First, as a background the importance of this region for Turkey’s energy relations in two different periods is reviewed: (i) the initial challenges in pipeline politics in the 1990s, and (ii) the role of energy security in Turkish foreign policy in the 2000s. Then, the chapter is divided into four sections. The first section presents an overview of Turkey’s policy toward the Eurasian energy pipelines in the post-Cold War period. The second section shows the recent status of Turkey’s energy relations with Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan. The third section questions to what extent Eurasia remains critical for Turkey’s energy security within the context of its interdependence with the energy supplying countries in the region. The argument asserts that not only strategic interests driven by trade-offs, but also a cognitive bias driven to an extent by the worldview of the recent political leadership and mostly by the national identity conception of the ruling elite are important in understanding and explaining Turkey’s energy security in Eurasia. The concluding part underlines the limitations and opportunities in Turkey’s pivot to Eurasia in light of the country’s asymmetric interdependence with Russia in energy security.
The Nexus Of Turkey’s Energy And Foreign Policy With Iraqi Kurdish Oil: The Iranian Connection
Özet Amerika'nın Irak'tan çekilmesinin ardından oluşan enerji çıkmazında Türkiye'nin dış politikasıyla enerji stratejisi çelişmektedir. Bir yandan Ankara'nın enerji çıkarları Kuzey Irak'la olan ilişkilerinin geliştirilmesini gerekli kılarken, diğer yandan ise Kürt sorunu ve İran'la jeopolitik rekabetinin şekillendirdiği geleneksel Türk dış politikası güçlü merkezi Bağdat hükümetinin varlığını gerekli görmektedir. Al-Maliki liderliğindeki merkezi Şii Bağdat Hükümeti'nin menfaat sahibi birçok yerel (Sünni, Şii, Kürt) ve uluslararası (İran, Amerika, Türkiye) arasındaki külli dengeleme (omnibalancing) siyaseti işleri daha da karmaşıklaştırmakta ve Türkiye'nin seçeneklerini sınırlamaktadır. Bahsedilen gelişmeler ışığında bu çalışma Türkiye'nin geleneksel Irak politikasının sürdürülemez olduğunu iddia etmekte ve bunun enerji stratejisiyle uyumlu olarak gözden geçirilmesi gerektiğini tartışmaktadır.
Turkey-KRG Relationship: Mutual Interests, Geopolitical Challenges
SETA Analysis, 2017
This analysis outlines the main drivers of the relationship between Turkey and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG).In less than a week, on September 25, the KRG is planning to hold a referendum on independence from Iraq, barring a last minute cancelation or a postponement. No outside power –other than Israel– appears ready to support a potential declaration of independence by the KRG. Turkey and the U.S. have been pushing hard for a cancelation of the referendum, as it promises to add yet another source of instability in an already destabilized region. Turkey, in particular, is fiercely opposed to the referendum as the KRG’s potential independence declaration threatens Iraq’s territorial integrity. So far, the KRG has refused to cancel the referendum. Although some have argued that Turkey might embrace the KRG’s bid for independence due to Ankara’s close ties with Erbil, the destabilizing impact of a potential declaration of independence is not in Turkey’s favor. This study should serve as a timely assessment of main areas of cooperation and mutual interests between Turkey and the KRG. We focus especially on energy partnership and security cooperation between Turkey and the KRG. In both areas, Ankara and Erbil have a deep and multilayered relationship that has withstood multiple political and security challenges. The pending independence referendum, however, has had a toxic impact on the relationship. A full examination of the independence question is beyond the scope of this study, however, assessing the main drivers of the Turkey-KRG relationship should contribute to our understanding of Turkey’s approach to the independence referendum.