Non-Standard Employment and Worker Solidarity in Canada (original) (raw)
Related papers
Forging Responsible Unions: Metal Workers and the Rise of the Labour Injunction in Canada
Labour / Le Travail, 1996
A study of labour history through the prism of the law yields important insights on two of the debates raging within the discipline. The first is on the role of institutions and, in particular, the question of their autonomy and the extent to which the well-being of the labour movement is tied to a supportive state. The second is on the role of discourse and, in particular, legal discourse in setting up categories which delimit the realm of legitimate claims, organize those claims in particular ways, and privilege some claims over others.
Canada “ Change in work organization and new Strategies for Union Power ”
2012
In the second part we set out the way by which labor force and unions, while appropriating of the high performance work systems’ content (HPWS), allow the emergence of a new subject of the production which we have characterized as production agent, contrary to its main-d'œuvre condition, characteristic of the Taylorist/Fordist pattern of organization. This subject of the production impacts in the process of union redefinition, granting it a wider perspective on the resources of power created from a new kind of membership.
2000
ANY ATTEMPT AT A HISTORICAL overview inevitably involves contentious choices, including those of focus, the analytic lens to deploy, and the themes that structure the narrative. The first and most controversial choice that we have made is that of focus. Our topic is the legal regulation of employment in 20th-century Canada. Despite the fact that during the 20th century employment has come to be treated as a synonym for work, these terms are not equivalent. Employment is a mere subset of the broader domain of work; it emerged as a specific legal category in England in the 19th century to specify the rights and obligations that comprised a bilateral labour market contract. Work, by contrast* captures a much broader range of productive activity, including the labour of small independent producers and women in the household. The false equivalence of the terms "employment" and "work" in the 20th century is evidence of the hegemony of the neo-classical vision of the labour market in which employment dominates.
Precarious Workers and the Neoliberal State
Working USA: The Journal of Labor & Society, 2016
How can we best conceptualize working-class mobilization in the post-Fordist regime of flexible accumulation? With the increasing precariousness of employment, how do workers press their demands? While the emphasis thus far has been on the melding of workplace and community organizing, which is a hallmark of “social movement unionism,” I argue that there is a countervailing trend afoot that has received far less attention—that is, a bifurcation of strategies. Only those select workers who are in powerful structural locations, such as transportation and distribution workers, are in a position to take the economic route while the swelling ranks of the precariat have turned instead to the political sphere to press their demands. Additionally, I address what this bifurcation means for labor's power and working-class formation. Does the separation of economic and political protest lead to a weakened working class? Such a separation has been thought to undermine class-based solidarities, with community identities undermining workplace-based ones. I argue, however, that the contemporary context is different in that precarious workers’ mobilizations in the community have become explicitly class-based. In contrast to the long-standing notion of the workplace as the hotbed of working-class consciousness, the community has emerged as a locus of class-based perspectives and solidarities. Throughout I emphasize not just strategy and material gain for the working class, but also shifts in civil society, organizations, and subjectivity. My argument is developed through a case study of the Chicago Jobs and Living Wage Campaign, which is then compared to other cases of precarious worker mobilization around the globe. Examining the tensions inherent in precarious workers’ political mobilization in the context of the post-Fordist neoliberal state, the study has implications for labor and social movements, class formation, citizenship, and contemporary capitalism
Nationalism and the Labour Movement in Canada
I will attempt to argue in this paper that working class consciousness remains low in Canada due to the rigid structure of organized labour and its incorporation of workers into the nationalist project, especially after World War II. I will reveal the extent of class divisions through analysis of income, wealth, educational, and occupational indicators. I will then examine the difference between class under “post-industrialism” and expressions of working-class consciousness and solidarity. Finally, I will examine Canadian unions' stance toward immigration, North American integration, and left-parties, and other issues concerning workers as formally-equal citizens. I argue that the link between labour unions and nationalism, and between labour unions, nationalism, and low class conflict is tied to a politics of state recognition and integration which limits the scope of community and solidarity under 21st century conditions. I will use this to argue for different possibilities for labour in Canadian politics than those pursued in the 20th century, based on contemporary shifts in labour force composition.