The Rabbinic Campaign to Eliminate Modern Orthodoxy (original) (raw)
An orthodox rabbi in the largest Jewish community in the Midwestern United States obsesses over his decision about whether or not to allow an openly gay congregant to pray in his synagogue. A local colleague of his routinely reviews the email posted on a community bulletin board in order to censor or delay the publication of any messages that might promote speakers or community activities that are not in keeping with his religious ideology. Fellow clergy at the local kollel and at the central metropolitan rabbinical organization are instructed to " freeze out " a more liberal orthodox congregation so as to throw its legitimacy into question. That congregation and its orthodox speakers are routinely targeted for ridicule in the social media. One of the longest tenured congregational rabbis in the city holds a series of classes for the community on the evils of what he refers to as " Open Orthodoxy, " and later calls a lay leader demanding that the appearance of a female scholar-in-residence be cancelled. A scion of the country's leading modern orthodox educational institution regrets the success of contemporary Torah education for women, and in particular the program initiated some years ago by his employer. A rabbi and teacher at a local yeshiva asks the creator of a well-known Jewish band, one that uses its music to teach Torah values, to cancel its performance at a local orthodox synagogue (whose practices he disagrees with) so that fans will not " lose faith in you and your holy mission. " Watch the news, read the papers or go online for your daily dose of Jewish pain and torment. The demonization of young Jews and the state of Israel on college campuses promises to leave those campuses " Judenrein " within a generation. Living overtly as a Jew is uncomfortable in more places than not. According to a plurality of the citizens of the world, Jews do not merit the same human rights as do others. Yet, orthodox Jewish leadership considers inclusiveness and fraternity a far greater existential threat to the Jewish people. As what used to be known as " modern orthodoxy " moves inexorably to the right, its leaders feel " duty-bound " to defend the " eternal mesora community of authentic Orthodoxy, " 1 even at the expense of communal unity against its real enemies. They are convinced that this mesora supersedes both halacha (Torah law) and one's scriptural duty to fellow Jews. The idea of an " inclusive " congregation that encourages more participation from women, within the boundaries of halacha is anathema to those who follow the lead of Israel's chief rabbinate, the thought leaders of right wing yeshivas, and now the leadership of what has variously been known as Modern or Centrist orthodoxy. The idea that all Jews are brothers and responsible for one another takes a back seat to the sanctity of rabbinic hegemony. So is there a justification for this " hatred " propagated by the " mesora " community against the " normatively " religious? How do those who exclude serious, observant Jews whose " hashkafa " (philosophy) differs from their own, explain the urgency of their actions to demean, and ultimately alienate those Jews?
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Moderate Ultra-Orthodoxy: Complexity and Nuance in American Ultra-Orthodox Judaism
This paper explores the changing nature of American ultra-Orthodox Judaism. Recent sociological accounts have asserted that Orthodox Judaism in America has moved towards the ‘right’, that is, towards a more fundamentalist and enclavist orientation. This paper addresses this claim using a combination of demographic survey data and qualitative interviews drawn from community members affiliated with three ultra-Orthodox boys’ elementary schools. I argue for a more complex understanding of this development: while American Orthodoxy may indeed be “sliding to the right”, this has likely had the effect of moderating rather than radicalizing ultra-Orthodox communities.
Accommodation and Resistance to Modernity: A Comparison of Two Contemporary Orthodox Jewish Groups
Sociological Analysis, 1990
This article presents a case study of how two particular religious groups --a modern Orthodox anda Lubavitch Chassidic Jewish community -construct their religious worlds in a modero society. A detailed analysis o… the religious teachings that each "traditional" religious group presents to newcomers reveals their distinct solutions to the tensions between modernity and tradition. The analysis highlights their responses to several features of modemity that have been emphasized by secularization theorists as particularly problematic for religion: cultural pluralism and individualism, rationalization, and the changing of women's roles. The modero Orthodox group's teachings reflect their accommodation to contemporary conceptions of pluralism, rationalism, and feminism. The Lubavitch teachings, in contrast, demonstrate the community's attempt to resist the dominant secular culture and to offer a separate religious altemative. The analysis shows that there are at least two distinct strategies for creating "traditional" religious communities in the modern context.
During the second half of the twentieth century, many observers of American Orthodoxy were struck by its move to the right, and a small group of social scientists offered a number of basic sociological factors to explain why Orthodoxy in modern society adopted a stance of greater isolation and ritualistic stringency. Perhaps the first social scientist to point to that phenomenon was Charles Liebman, who indicated (albeit without explaining) the trend in his pioneering analysis of American Orthodox Judaism. 1 Almost two decades later, he wrote his seminal essay, ''Extremism as a Religious Norm,'' 2 which analyzed religious extremism in general and Jewish religious extremism in particular but did not deal specifically with American Orthodox Judaism. Rather, he focused on developments in Orthodox Judaism in Israel. In a paper that focused specifically on American Orthodox patterns, Chaim Waxman distinguished between haredi Judaism and Modern Orthodoxy in terms of three variables. 3 The first involves attitudes toward the larger society and the larger Jewish community and essentially is a matter of ''isolation,'' the stance of the haredi, versus ''inclusion,'' which is that of the Modern Orthodox. A second variable entails attitudes toward modernity, general scholarship and science, with the haredi being antagonistic and Modern Orthodoxy being accommodating if not welcoming. The third involves a basic difference between the two communities in their attitudes toward Zionism and their active involvement in Jewish national rebirth and development, with the haredi being antagonistic towards the Zionist enterprise and the Modern Orthodox welcoming it as a religious value. 4 A number of examples of ''haredization'' were presented but perhaps its most conspicuous manifestations were in American Orthodox Jewry's greater punctiliousness in ritual observance, perceived by many to be a proclivity to adopt unduly stringent stances, humrot, on ritual matters, as well as a distinct inward turn highlighted by decreased cooperation with the Conservative and Reform branches of American Judaism. By the turn of the 21st century, these tendencies advanced to the point where a keen observer of the American Jewish scene perceived a kulturkampf in American Judaism, with the
Feminism and #MeToo in the Lives of Orthodox Jewish Women
The feminist #MeToo movement that launched in the United States in 2017 has had a significant impact on organizations and individuals, whether public sector, nonprofit, in Hollywood, or on Wall Street. 1 This movement has definitively changed the landscape of sexual assault reporting and how women's testimony is received by the public. Additionally, the #MeToo movement has inspired many women to speak about their experiences, which has awakened the world to just how prevalent a problem sexual assault and harassment is in our society. 2 Though this movement has arguably had a strong effect on our public discourse from entertainment to politics to sports, some groups have largely been excluded from the discussion. One of the most prominent examples of this is the Orthodox Jews. Orthodox Jews are members of a denomination of the Jewish religion that makes up about 10% of Jewish people across the globe. 3 Under the Orthodox Jewish umbrella, there are two main groups: Haredi (or ultra) Orthodox and Modern Orthodox Jews. For this paper, "Orthodox" refers to Modern Orthodox Jews. This is because the nature of Haredi Jews, as even more insular and strict in their observance of traditional Jewish law compared to Modern Orthodox Jews, makes conducting research with Haredim quite difficult. 4 Modern Orthodox Jews are, simply put, easier to get in contact with. However, research in the Modern Orthodox Jewish community is still quite difficult due to the very self-contained and exclusionary nature of the community.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.