S. MANACORDA (eds.), Cybercriminality: Finding A Balance Between Freedom And Security (original) (raw)
Related papers
Transnational Jurisdiction for Cybercrimes de lege lata and de lege ferenda
European Criminal Law Review, 2020
In a legal discourse about criminal law in an interconnected society, cybercrime plays an important role - the more the Internet invades essential areas of life, the more criminal behaviour is committed on and with the assistance of the Internet. However, there is a fundamental conflict in the attempt to regulate human behaviour on the Internet - a conflict between the boundless nature of the Internet and the limited sovereign powers of governments. This applies to the question of jurisdiction over extraterritorial offences. Which criminal law order should apply if the perpetrator has acted abroad but because of the internet the actual or potential effects of his act also extend to national territory? This article looks in detail at the transnational application of criminal law, especially in the case of “offences of abstract endangerment”. After looking briefly at the current legal situation in Germany, it evaluates two draft laws planning to extend jurisdiction. This allows a disc...
Jurisdictional challenges in fighting cybercrimes: Any panacea from international law?
Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, 2015
Jurisdiction is pivotal and fundamental to administration of legal justice in general and of criminal justice in particular. It is trite in law that no matter how well conducted a proceeding was, lack of jurisdiction on the part of the trial court would bring to nullity the entire adjudicatory process. Jurisdiction itself is an issue of law. Yet, hardly are there uniform laws across jurisdictions. Even if the substantive laws are similar, the adjectival laws and enforcement procedures may differ. It is observed that situations are all the more complex when related to crimes in cyberspace which knows no boundaries. However, it may seem that the global nature of cyberspace and the Internet are coterminous with international geographical space, and thus may be subjected to the provisions of international law. This paper, after due consideration, discovers that this is not necessarily so. Rather than constituting a definitive panacea, some international law provisions and practice can o...
The Way Forward in Addressing Cybercrime Regulation on a Global Level
Journal of internet technology and secured transactions, 2012
The proliferation of cybercrime necessitates all internetconnected states to be involved in cybercrime regulation, not only on a national and/or transnational level but also on a global level. Although it has been stated that the internet per se and cyberspace in general are by its very nature ungovernable, most nation-states have implemented national and in some instances transnational laws to regulate the internet and cyberspace for law enforcement and national security purposes. The effectiveness of such regulation in cross-border crime commission has brought about many unsolved problems which necessitate a debate on the way forward in addressing cybercrime regulation on a global level. As illustrated in the discussion, cyberspace may very well become ungovernable if a "super-power" nation-state or a cluster of nation-states take a unilateral decision regarding which conduct constitutes permissible online conduct and subsequently try to superimpose these laws on other nation-states. It is suggested that under the auspices of the United Nations and within an international law context the following issues should be addressed: conceptualizing the term "cybercrime" in establishing for example whether it includes a cyber-attack, determining which online conduct is permissible to ensure peace and security and initiating negotiations towards a cybercrime treaty. Addressing the latter issues will constitute a starting point in the way forward in ensuring cybercrime regulation on a global level.
Jurisdiction for criminal offenses of cybercrime: International and national standards
Pravo - teorija i praksa
Criminal acts of a computer crime are no longer a new social and legal phenomenon. In addition to the execution of criminal acts that fall within the domain of a computer crime, computers have found their application in the execution of the so-called classic criminal acts, giving them a different modus operandi. A spatial distance between the action taken and the resulting consequences during the execution of criminal acts of a computer crime, led to the strengthening of the transnational crime. Initially, the international community tried to intervene in this area, with the idea of regulating the criminal prosecution of the perpetrators of the cross-border criminal acts of a computer crime. However, to date, there has been adopted no normative framework regulating the issue of prosecuting the perpetrators of these criminal acts at the universal level. In this sense, the paper analyzes the existing international standards with regard to the normative arrangement of jurisdiction for ...
2009
Computer crime or cyber-crime, i.e. unlawful conduct committed over the Internet,is spilling over national borders and causing a huge legal headache, particularly inthe matter of deciding which jurisdiction such crime should fall under. The law isnot always prepared for meeting the demands of globalisation and new unlawful activities based on the illicit use of ICTs. The intrinsic cross-border character of this new type of crime also creates a need for improved cross-border law enforcement cooperation at European and international level. As EU integration continues, the need for better coordination of criminal policies is accentuated. This is true in particular for the field of fight against cybercrime. There are different multinational projects to interconnect these policies. Despite the existence of organs and structure such as the Europol High Tech crimegroup, it cannot be claimed that an elaborated coherent horizontal policy in Europe on the fight against cyber crime exists. A c...
How Customary International Law is affected by cyber-investigations
2019
Cross border investigations are essential for fighting cybercrimes due to the globalization of the Internet, especially with the anonymity and decentralization aspects of dark web and blockchain technologies. However, this extraterritorial enforcement jurisdiction clearly collides with international duties of jurisdiction, state sovereignty and non-intervention. This issue has been discussed by the group of experts who wrote the Tallinn Manual. Despite this collision, the United States has amended its domestic law in a way that can be used to allow warrants for remote access to search electronic storage media and seize electronic evidence relevant to a criminal investigation regardless of jurisdiction. There are also clear examples of practice to this extraterritorial jurisdiction in the investigations of Silk Road and Playpen and a NIT warrant issued by a magistrate judge in Colorado. A newly enacted Egyptian law for fighting cybercrimes also can be used to allow such warrants to be issued. These advancements to domestic laws and state practice in the area of cyber investigations and the absence of disagreement by another state or tension in international relations, this paper argues, are currently pushing to create a new customary international law with an exception to the general norms. This exception, as this paper argues, that is being formed currently by state actions and domestic laws, will allow cross border investigative behavior by one state, that involves remotely accessing electronic storage media and collection of electronic evidence from private computers located in the territory of another state without its prior authorization, especially in the dark web and the blockchain network without violation to international duties to a certain extent.
The need for cybercrime regulation on a global scale by the international law and cyber convention
This study highlights the necessity of controlling the issue of Cybercrime with International Law Principles and treaties, the legal foundation of international cybercrime legislation. The paper pursued normative behavior relying on the legislation of the European Union and countries outside of Europe. The implications of Cybercrime in cyberattack events establish a legal foundation for preventing and punishing cyber criminals wherever they occur. The perceived threats arising from cyberattack activities are grounded in known cyberattack behaviors and literature, underscoring the imminent nature of these threats. The Convention on Cybercrime, inaugurated in Budapest, Hungary, in November 2001, is recognized as a pivotal international agreement addressing Cybercrime and electronic evidence. The negotiation process included the Council of Europe, United States, Japan, Canada, and South African participants. Significantly, nations across Africa, the Americas, and the Asia/Pacific are harnessing this agreement to implement robust strategies against cybercrime. Cybercrime is a new area of international law, namely, International Criminal Law. The international community handles it because no convention has identified Cybercrime globally. It is urgent to govern Cybercrime globally, and statistics imply that the need to regulate Cybercrime under international criminal law is critical. The paper adopts a method designed to deeply understand the global legal structures related to cybercrime. The study employs a comprehensive approach, merging normative legal research to meticulously examine and interpret key legal documents such as the Budapest Convention, with a comparative legal analysis both within the European Union and globally. This analysis scrutinizes various jurisdictions, identifying best practices and discrepancies to inform a holistic understanding of cybercrime regulation. Policy analysis is conducted to critically assess existing strategies and propose innovative solutions, while technological insights are integrated to ensure legal frameworks are attuned to the rapidly evolving landscape of cyber threats. Involving a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including legal scholars and cybersecurity experts, the research offers a diverse perspective. This multifaceted approach aims to balance thorough legal scrutiny with actionable solutions, promoting robust and flexible strategies for international cybercrime regulation. The results of this comprehensive study underscore the urgent need for a global, unified legal response to combat cybercrime effectively. It concludes that the Budapest Convention marks a significant turning point, offering a foundation for international cooperation and legal harmonization in tackling cybercrimes. However, the rapid technological advancements and the evolving sophistication of cyber threats demand that this convention and other international legal instruments adapt and expand accordingly. The study highlights the importance of harmonizing legal definitions and practices across different jurisdictions, both in common law and civil law countries, cybercrime address the borderless nature of cybercrime. The necessity for enhanced collaboration between public and private sectors in cybercrime investigations is emphasized, alongside the importance of establishing ethical data collection and sharing standards.