[Malignant pleural mesothelioma: multidisciplinary experience in a public tertiary hospital] (original) (raw)
Related papers
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2011
Introduction: Pleural malignant mesothelioma is an uncommon but extremely invasive tumor which originates from mesothelial cells and usually occurs after prolonged exposure to asbestos. Different types of surgical and oncological therapeutic methods have been used resulting in various outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate, clinicopathologically, 40 patients with pleural malignant mesothelioma and the main factors influencing their prognosis. Methods: In this study, 40 patients with a definitive diagnosis, who had been followed up for at least 3 years were studied according to these: epidemiologic factors, stage and pathological types, treatment method and complications, and by using factors that influence patients survival, we evaluated them statistically. Results: The M/F ratio was l3/1 with an average age of 55 years. Chest pain was the most common symptom. In 55% of patients, the lesions were localized in the left site and most were in Buchart stage I or II. The epithelial form was the most common pathological pattern (62.5%). 47.5% of patients only received radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Of patients who underwent decortication and pleurectomy with adjuvant therapy, extrapleural was performed in 20% of patients, and pneumonectomy, in 17.5%; and 15% refused any type of treatment. One patient died from the surgery. The most common surgical complication was wound infection. The average survival was 10.5 months, and the main factors influencing the survival were physiologic status, pathological form of disease, stage of disease and the pattern of pleural involvement. Conclusion: Because of the low survival after multimodality invasive treatments in mesothelioma, aggressive therapeutic methods were recommended in patients with good physiological status and early clinical stage with a good pathology type.
Respiration, 2010
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has a poor prognosis. Only few studies in literature investigated the presence of pleural fluid and radiographic findings for the prognosis of MPM. We retrospectively investigated the hospital charts of 363 MPM patients who were diagnosed from January 1989 to March 2010. Survival time was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Pretreatment clinical, laboratory and radiographic features of each patient at the time of diagnosis were obtained from patients' charts. The mean age of 363 patients (217 men, 146 women) was 50.6 ± 11.2 years (range 19-85) and the mean survival time was 11.7 ± 8.6 months (range 1-53). Histological types of MPM were epithelial (71.2%), mixed (15.9%) and sarcomatous type (4.9%). The frequency of disease stages were 31.4% for stage 1, 24.2% for stage 2, 28.6% for stage 3 and 15.8% for stage 4. The most frequent symptoms were dyspnea (82.1%), chest pain (68.3%) and weight loss (58.9%). Results of univariate and multivariat...
[Pleural mesothelioma: experience with 62 cases in 9 years]
Archivos de bronconeumología, 2004
To describe the diagnostic approach, clinical and radiological characteristics, and survival of patients with pleural mesothelioma treated in our hospital over a 9-year period. All patients with a diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma diagnosed in our hospital from January 1992 through December 2000 were studied. Sixty-two patients (49 men) with a mean age of 65 years (range, 45-85) were diagnosed. Probable or known contact with asbestos was established for 41 patients (66%). Ninety-four percent of the patients had chest pain or dyspnea at the onset of clinical assessment. The tumor was situated in the right hemithorax in 33 patients; 59 patients had pleural effusion, and 3 only had pleural thickening. The pleural fluid was bloody in 19% of patients, glucose levels were less than 60 mg/dL in 44%, and the pH of pleural fluid was less than 7.20 in 19%. The diagnosis was established by pleural biopsy for 52%, and by thoracoscopy or thoracotomy for 44%. The median survival was 11 months (95...
[Clinical diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma]
Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery, 2007
Accurate and rapid diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma is important because of its rapid progress. But diagnosis of this disease is often difficult. We reviewed 64 cases with a pathological diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma in the past 14 years in our hospital. We made diagnosis of this disease by cytologic study of pleural fluid (11 cases), percutaneous needle biopsy (16), thoracoscopic biopsy (34), or surgery (2). When cytologic findings are inconclusive, thoracoscopic biopsy is the most effective method for diagnosis and should be done without delay.
Malignant pleural mesothelioma: a problematic review
Surgical Oncology, 1998
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare tumor that has been di$cult to study. Because of disappointing treatment results, malignant pleural mesothelioma has remained an area of active research and development. A clinicopathologic review is performed in light of several problematic issues involving diagnosis, staging, natural history, and treatment. Multimodality treatment with surgery followed by adjuvant local and systemic therapy remains the most optimal therapy. Many controversial issues still exist in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. In the ensuing years newer staging systems, better preoperative staging, newer experimental therapies, and the localization of patients at expert centers will undoubtedly have an impact on disease management. : S 0 9 6 0 -7 4 0 4 ( 9 8 ) 0 0 0 1 9 -X
2013
Introduction: Pleural malignant mesothelioma is an uncommon but extremely invasive tumor which originates from mesothelial cells and usually occurs after prolonged exposure to asbestos. Different types of surgical and oncological therapeutic methods have been used resulting in various outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate, clinicopathologically, 40 patients with pleural malignant mesothelioma and the main factors influencing their prognosis. Methods: In this study, 40 patients with a definitive diagnosis, who had been followed up for at least 3 years were studied according to these: epidemiologic factors, stage and pathological types, treatment method and complications, and by using factors that influence patients survival, we evaluated them statistically. Results: The M/F ratio was l3/1 with an average age of 55 years. Chest pain was the most common symptom. In 55% of patients, the lesions were localized in the left site and most were in Buchart stage I or II. The epithelial form was the most common pathological pattern (62.5%). 47.5% of patients only received radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Of patients who underwent decortication and pleurectomy with adjuvant therapy, extrapleural was performed in 20% of patients, and pneumonectomy, in 17.5%; and 15% refused any type of treatment. One patient died from the surgery. The most common surgical complication was wound infection. The average survival was 10.5 months, and the main factors influencing the survival were physiologic status, pathological form of disease, stage of disease and the pattern of pleural involvement. Conclusion: Because of the low survival after multimodality invasive treatments in mesothelioma, aggressive therapeutic methods were recommended in patients with good physiological status and early clinical stage with a good pathology type.
Journal of Thoracic Disease
The malignant pleural mesothelioma is a very aggressive tumor which is arising from mesothelial cells and is associated with asbestos exposure. It is a heterogeneous cancer that shows a complex pattern of molecular changes, including genetic, chromosomic, and epigenetic abnormalities. The malignant pleural mesothelioma is characterized by a silent and slow clinical progression with an average period of 20-40 years from the asbestos exposure phase to the start of the symptoms. Unfortunately, to date, the therapeutic options are very limited, especially if the tumor is detected late. This narrative review provides an extended overview of the present evidence in the literature regarding the epidemiology, diagnostic pathways and treatment approaches of the malignant pleural mesothelioma. The treatment of mesothelioma has evolved slowly over the last 20 years not only from a surgical point of view but also radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy play nowadays a key role. Several surgical strategies are available ranging from extrapleural pneumonectomy to cytoreductive surgery but a multidisciplinary approach seems to be mandatory because a single approach has not proved to date to be resolutive. New non-surgical treatment options appear to be promising but the results have to be taken in account with caution because clear evidence with high-quality studies is still lacking
BMC Cancer, 2015
Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with poor prognosis in spite of significant improvement in survival, due to new chemotherapy regimens. We describe here patients' profiles and management in daily practice in France. Methods: Observational retrospective study. Data were collected from medical files. All patients with histologically proven MPM diagnosed from January 2005 to December 2008 were included in the participating sites. Results: Four hundred and six patients were included in 37 sites: mean age 68.9 ± 9.8 years, male predominance (sex ratio 3.27), latency of the disease 45.7 years, epithelioïd type 83 %. Diagnosis was made using thoracoscopy in 80.8 % of patients. Radical surgery was performed in 6.2 % of cases. Chemotherapy was administered to 74.6 % of patients. First line regimens consisted mainly of platinum + pemetrexed (91 %) or pemetrexed alone (7 %). Objective response rate was 17.2 % and another 41.6 % of patients experienced disease stabilization. Half of these patients underwent second line chemotherapy (platinium + pemetrexed 31.6 %, pemetrexed alone 24.6 %), resulting in a 6 % response rate. Third-line chemotherapy (56 patients) yielded disease control in 5.4 % of cases. Conclusions: The management of MPM in France is usually in accordance with guidelines. Response rates are somewhat lower than those described in clinical trials.
Malignant pleural mesothelioma: a comprehensive review
Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center, 2006
The incidence of malignant mesothelioma continues to increase, but the disease remains difficult to detect early and treat effectively. The authors review the pathogenesis, incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, pathology, and both standard and experimental treatments for mesothelioma. When possible, surgery (video-assisted thoracoscopy, pleurectomy/decortication, or extrapleural pneumonectomy) is utilized. Effects on underlying structures limit application of radiation therapy, but some systemic agents are beginning to enhance survival. The disease is expected to increase in incidence till 2020, so awareness of this entity as a possible diagnosis should be heightened. In patients with advanced disease, several newer antitumor agents are already showing a capability of extending survival so it is not unreasonable to expect further progress in this area.
Tanaffos, 2014
Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but fatal thoracic tumor, which in the majority of patients is caused by prolonged exposure to asbestos fibers. We aimed at presenting clinicopathological and treatment outcomes of 60 patients of MPM registered in our hospital cancer registry. Materials and Methods: Demographic characteristics of patients, exposure to asbestos, smoking habit, their clinicopathologic characteristics and survival analysis were described. Results: Sixty patients had MPM. Forty patients (66.7%) were men. The mean age of patients was 55.8±11 years. Chest pain and dyspnea were the most prevalent symptoms (31.7%, and 30%, respectively). Thirty-six (61.7%) patients reported asbestos exposure. The median survival and Progression free survival (PFS) were 10.5 months (0.95CI=9.22-11.78) and 7.57 months (0.95CI=5.68-9.45), respectively. In multivariate analysis, exposure to asbestos and epithelioid subtype significantly extended the survival time. Bilateral involvement, high blood level of LDH and platelet count ≥400,000 significantly shortened the overall survival. Conclusion: MPM is still an important health problem in Iran. Given the aforementioned results, developing a national program to eliminate asbestosrelated diseases according to the world health organization (WHO) recommendation is necessary.