Womens' preference in Down syndrome screening (original) (raw)

A prospective two years study of first trimester screening for Down syndrome

Hippokratia, 2008

Uptake of prenatal diagnostic testing and the effectiveness of prenatal screening for Down syndrome

Prenatal Diagnosis, 2010

A comparison of the impact of screen-positive results obtained from ultrasound and biochemical screening for Down syndrome in the first trimester: a pilot study

Martin Weinans

Prenatal Diagnosis, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Information about prenatal screening for Down syndrome

M. Fransen, Marie-louise Essink-bot

Patient Education and Counseling, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

A survey of the awareness, use and attitudes of women towards Down syndrome screening

Semra Ay

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals

Maria João Ribeiro

European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study

Melania-Elena Tudose

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

View PDFchevron_right

Maternal serum screening for Down syndrome - opinions on acceptance from Swedish women

Anna-karin Dykes

Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Women’s and health professionals’ preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive tests

Stephen Morris

Genetics in Medicine, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a survey of willingness in women and family physicians to engage in shared decision-making

Susie Gagnon

Prenatal diagnosis, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: are women’s perceptions changing?

James McFarlane

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies Commentary: Results may not be widely applicable Authors' response

Stuart Logan

BMJ, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Retrospective audit of different antenatal screening policies for Down's syndrome in eight district general hospitals in one health region

David Howe

BMJ, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome

Louise Bryant

Public Health, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Undergoing prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: presentation of choice and information in Europe and Asia

Hajo wildschut

European Journal of Human Genetics, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population

L. Bidat, Isabele Durand-zaleski

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Serum screening for Down's syndrome: some women's experiences

J Green

BMJ, 1993

View PDFchevron_right

Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's Syndrome screening tests: a conjoint analysis study

Cheryl Berlin

2004

View PDFchevron_right

Clinical first-trimester routine screening for Down syndrome in singleton pregnancies in northern Finland

Yrtti Valinen

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Pregnant Women’s Attitudes Toward Amniocentesis Before Receiving Down Syndrome Screening Results

Bojana Brajenović-Milić

Womens Health Issues, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Is prenatal screening for Down syndrome needed in young pregnant women?

Rekha Dhamnaskar

International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Screening for Down syndrome based on maternal age or fetal nuchal translucency: a randomized controlled trial in 39 572 pregnancies

M. Kublickas, Peter Malcus

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Down syndrome screening in the United States in 2001 and 2007: a survey of maternal-fetal medicine specialists

Peter Benn

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Danish Sonographers' Experiences of the Introduction of "Moderate Risk" in Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome

Ida Vogel

Journal of pregnancy, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

PRENATAL SCREENING FOR FETAL ANEUPLOIDY, DOWN’S SYNDROME, WHO, WHOM, WHY & HOW?????

IP Innovative Publication Pvt. Ltd.

View PDFchevron_right

Trends in state/population-based Down syndrome screening and invasive prenatal testing with the introduction of first-trimester combined Down syndrome screening, South Australia, 1995-2005

Annabelle Chan

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications

Huso Yi

BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluation of first trimester maternal serum and ultrasound screening for Down's syndrome in Eastern and Northern Finland

A. Perheentupa, Markku Ryynänen

European Journal of Human Genetics, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Review article Advances in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: II first trimester testing, integrated testing, and future directions

Peter Benn

2002

View PDFchevron_right

Understandings of Down's syndrome and their place in the prenatal testing context

Louise Bryant

2003

View PDFchevron_right

A survey of the knowledge and attitudes of pregnant Thai women towards Down syndrome screening

Tharangrut Hanprasertpong, Ninlapa Pruksanusak, Chitkasaem Suwanrath

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Womens' preference in Down syndrome screening (original) (raw)

Related papers