Issues Associated with the Implementation of Article 82 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Practical Overview of Article 76 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
2005
The United Nations Convention for the Law of the Sea, adopted in 1982, is the legal framework that sets out the rights and duties of States in the use and exploitation of the oceans. Article 76 through to article 85 in Part VI of the Convention is dedicated to provisions related to the continental shelf such as the determination and delineation of the outer limits of the extended continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles and other rights of States over the continental shelf. The determination of the foot of the continental slope is one of the major features in the establishment of the outer limits of the juridical continental shelf under Article 76 of the Convention. It is the intention through this paper to provide an overview along with the basic information for a better understanding of the key issues of article 76 of the Convention. In this attempt, the important issues in the preparation of a submission for an extended continental shelf have been addressed through a review of...
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Appraisal, Prospects and Problems
2017
The development of the current law of the sea and the growing concern for the condition of the oceans have given rise to a number of legal regimes addressing problems of the marine environment including loss of biodiversity, pollution, protection of endangered species, and marine mammals. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ("UNCLOS") provides a legal framework and foundation for continuing progress in the international arena. The future of marine conservation depends upon the ability and willingness of states to cooperate in these common objectives and the capacity of individual states to prescribe and enforce their own marine conservation laws. This paper examines the legal mandate established under the UNCLOS and its consequences on the rights and obligations of all states to ensure protection and preservation of the ocean. This paper further evaluate the strengthens and shortcomings of UNCLOS, with particular focus on the legal status of the maritime jurisdictional zones, and concluded that the Convention has brought the needed measure of certainty and stability to the law of the sea, even though more could still be done to meet expectations.
Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 2019
A Brief History of the Law of the Sea and the ICP On 1 November 1967, Malta’s Ambassador to the UN, Arvid Pardo, asked the nations of the world to recognize a looming conflict that could devastate the oceans. In a speech to the UN General Assembly (UNGA), he called for “an effective international regime over the seabed and the ocean floor beyond a clearly defined national jurisdiction.” The speech set in motion a process that spanned 15 years and saw: the creation of the UN Seabed Committee; the signing of a treaty banning the emplacement of nuclear weapons on the seabed; the adoption of a UNGA declaration that all resources of the seabed beyond the limits of national jurisdiction are the “common heritage of mankind”; and the convening of the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment. These were some of the factors that led to the Third UN Conference on the Law of the Sea during which UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was adopted. UNCLOS: Opened for signature on 10 December 1982 in Montego Bay, Jamaica, at the Third UN Conference on the Law of the Sea, UNCLOS sets forth the rights and obligations of states regarding the use of the oceans, their resources, and the protection of the marine and coastal environment. UNCLOS entered into force on 16 November 1994, and is supplemented by the 1994 Deep Seabed Mining Agreement and the 1995 Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of UNCLOS relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks.
Reinforcing the Law of the Sea Convention of 1982 Through Clarification and Implementation
Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, 2020
That the Law of the Sea Convention faces implementation challenges is nothing new; it is, as many have noted, a framework and a scaffold a constitution for the oceans which necessarily left many matters of detail to future negotiation, associated instruments, and state practice. What has emerged over the last two decades, however, is an increasing reluctance on the part of states to pursue implantation via new, more detailed, treaty commitments. This article explores alternative options for enhancing Law of the Sea Convention compliance options that do not necessarily require the 'more law' path to granularity and implementation. The analysis begins by describing the amenability of the LOSC to refinement processes, focusing upon its flexibility (including its ‘constructive ambiguity’) and conduciveness (the significant allowance built into the LOSC for domestic contextualization, interpretation, and implementation). With this background established, the analysis then explore...
The Law of the Sea : priorities and responsibilities in implementing the convention
1995
This agreement supersedes the 1 974 Paris Convention on land-based sources and the 1972 Oslo Convention on dumping. lt includes a small segment of the Arclic Ocean. Convention on the Protection ol the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, Helsinki (1992) This supersedes the 1974 Baltic Convention. Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution, Barcelona (1976). Convention on the Protection of the Black Sea against Pollution, Bucharest (1992). M¡ddle East and North Africa RegionalConventionforCo-operationonthe Protectionof the Marine Environmentfrom Pollution, Kuwait (1978). Regional Convention for the Conservation of the Marine Environment of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden Environment, Jeddah (1982). Afr¡ca Convention for Cooperation in the Protection and Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the West and CentralAfrican Region, Abidjan (1981). Convention for the Protection, Management and Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the Eastern African Region, Nairobi (1985). South America and Pacific Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and Coastal Areas of the South East Pacific, Lima (1981). Convention for the Protection and Development of Natural Resources and Environment of the South Pacific Region, Noumea (1986). Carlbbean Conventionforthe Protection and Developmentof theMarine Environmentof theWiderCaribbean Region, Cartagena (1 983).