A HISTORICAL-COMPARATIVE APPROACH TO INDIAN POLITICAL THOUGHT: LOCATING AND EXAMINING DOMESTICATED DIFFERENCES (original) (raw)
Scholars have highlighted various issues and approaches on which to focus attention within the emerging field of cross-cultural political thought. Developing a responsible methodological approach to non-Western traditions is of particular significance, given the growing importance of such traditions, the danger of cultural reductionism and the undue imposition of Western terms and categories during the comparative process. Consequently, this article argues for a historical approach to Brahmanical-Hindu political thought that examines distinctions between genres, concepts , terms and categories, including how these distinctions influence the historical meaning of political ideas. To illustrate my argument, a revised interpretation of the Sanskrit word mªtsyanyªya — which had been unfortunately translated into the familiar phrase 'state of nature' — both clarifies our understanding of Brahmanical political thought and displays how existing comparisons 'domesticate' important differences between European and Brahmanical political ideas. Such analysis exposes a culturally reductive interpretive process operating within existing comparative scholarship.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Related papers
Hindu Tradition of Political Thought: An Overview
The Hindu tradition of political thought is unique in so many ways. There are so many easily identifiable markers in Indian knowledge tradition which set it apart from the western tradition of political thought. The political thinking in India has been original and rich. The concept of state in India is situated both in the Dharmashastric as well as Arthashastric traditions. The State is supposed to work for the goals set by the dharmshastras and achieve the same through the instrumentality of arthshastras. The local, national and international levels of politics are intertwined in this scheme so much so that one is incomplete without the other. It is within this backdrop that the present paper has examined some of the broad contours of Hindu tradition of political though and put them in relationship with each other.
While numerous methodological and interpretive challenges confront the study of cross-cultural political theory, this essay examines a particular premodern Indian tradition as an example of such difficulties and one way in which they can be overcome. Exploring the problematic ways in which people have interpreted and made use of India's ancient past, it critically examines arguments for the existence of secularism, free elections, and democratic assemblies in the Vedas. Defending what I call a " critical revivalist " position, it is argued that predominant approaches to premodern traditions in contemporary Indian political theory place significant constraints on cross-cultural intelligibility and theory building within the Indian context. To elaborate this point, I shift from a " political " to rājan-oriented categorical register in an effort to reposition current understandings of self-rule (swaraj) in India within a broader rajanical tradition. Finally, this essay explains how contemporary Indian political theory can draw insights from this native tradition without necessarily reverting to familiar Western idioms.
Review Article: Changing Trajectories of Indian Political Thought
South Asia Chronicle, vol. 4
There has been a sudden expansion and interest in Indian Political Thought (hereafter IPT) and this review article seeks to map the changing trajectories of IPT. The four books under review are: Ananya Vajpeyi, Righteous Republic: The Political Foundations of Modern India. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2012. C.A. Bayly, Recovering Liberties: Indian Thought in the Age of Liberalism and Empire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Gurpreet Mahajan, India: Political Ideas and the Making of a Democratic Discourse. London: Zed Books, 2013. Pradip Kumar Datta, Sanjay Palshikar and Achin Vanaik, eds.: Indian Political Thought: Volume 3, ICSSR Research Surveys and Explorations: Political Science, Volumes 1-4. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Elements of polity in the Vedic literature
India has a rich and variegated culture. With regard to polity or statecraft, the emergence of a systematic work like Kaitiliya Arthasastra, at least 2000 years afar, shows that the discipline has a hoary history in this land.In the Vedic literature, though we do not get a picture of well developed discipline of polity, we do get clear mention and descriptions of some elements of statecraft. This paper tries to trace such elements.
Political Thought: Indian and Western
Book, 2022
Kautilya is a very famous ancient philosopher who is always known as in the name of Chanakya and Vishnugupata. Although he belonged to 4 th Century BC, but his philosophy of governance of state is still followed by the modern political rulers. He possessed very rare qualities in the field of Indian social, political, military and economy. Due to his intelligence and farsighted knowledge he could able to make Chandragupta Maurya as the great emperor and thereby proved himself as the great nation builder. Chanakya never supported an autocrat ruler rather he always advised the ruler to govern the state in ethical and moral principles while delivering justice to the people. It is very often described that Chanakya was just like Indian Machiavelli particularly in the 20 th Century when India got independence. This statement was also supported by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minster of India, who categorically mentioned in his "Discovery of India" and argued that a lot of Kautilya's thought are based on the philosophy of realism and it is highly appropriate to modern nation also. In this context, the main purpose of this article is to explore and critically analyse the genius of Kautilya and try to understand the contemporary relevance of his ideas. Kautilya was a Brahmin. There is no unanimity among the scholars regarding the period of birth of Kautilya. However, it is mostly believed that Kautilya was born in Takshila which is now in Pakistan. It is also seen that most scholars believe that Kautilya lived in between 400 B.C. to 320 B.C. The father of Kautilya was a devotee of Lord Vishnu and in affection he gave the name of his son as Vishnugupta. It is also said that though he belonged to "Kutala"
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.