Glocalization of " Christian Social Responsibility " : The Contested Legacy of the Lausanne Movement among Neo-Evangelicals in South Korea (original) (raw)

Glocalization of " Christian Social Responsibility " : The Contested Legacy of the Lausanne Movement among Neo-Evangelicals in South Korea 1

This paper examines the contested legacy of the First Lausanne Congress in South Korean neo-evangelical communities. In response to growing political and social conflicts in the Global South during the 1960s and 1970s, thousands of evangelical leaders from more than 150 countries gathered at Lausanne, Switzerland, in 1974 to discuss the proper relationship between evangelism and social action. The meeting culminated with the proclamation of the Lausanne Covenant, which affirmed both evangelism and public involvement as essential elements of the Christian faith. However, the absence of practical guidelines in the Covenant opened the door for all sorts of evangelical social activism, whether from the Evangelical Right or the Evangelical Left, for years to come. In light of such diverse ramifications of the Congress at both the global and local level, this paper explores the various ways in which the idea of " Christian social responsibility " has been interpreted and implemented by two distinct generations of neo-evangelical social activists in contemporary South Korea in relation to their respective socio-historical experiences of the Cold War and the 1980s democratic movement.

Another Christian Right? The Politicization of Korean Protestantism in Contemporary Global Society

Social Compass, 2014

The author explores the political rise of conservative Protestantism in the larger context of Protestant Christianity’s reconfiguration in Korea. The incorporation of East Asia into the modern world resulted not only in the failure to establish a single Korean state, but also in the rise of the category ‘religion’ in this region. The remarkable growth of Korean Protestantism was, in large part, due to its great contribution, as a model religion, to the building of Korea as a modern nation. Since the late 1980s, however, the public has lost confidence in it and there has been a rise in discourses of nation re-building that give great emphasis to indigenous cultures and regional resources. Meanwhile, Protestant Churches have emerged as a key opponent to nationalist aspirations and programmes for social reform. The re-politicization of Protestantism in post-Cold War South Korea reflects the extent of the insecurity stemming from of Korea’s shifting place in a newly globalized East Asia. Religion makes the re-entry of Korea into the late-modern world at once dynamic and unpredictable

Christianity's Role in the Modernization and Revitalization of Korean Society in the Twentieth-Century

International Journal of Public Theology, 2010

The development of South Korea and its growth to become the world's eleventh largest economy has been accompanied by the introduction of Christianity and its increase to become the major religious group, to which nearly thirty per cent of the population are affiliated. This article probes the connection between these two spectacular examples of development; economic and religious. By highlighting moments or episodes of Christian contribution to aspects of development in Korean history and linking these to relevant aspects of Korean Christian theology, there is shown to be a constructive, although not always intentional, link between Korean Christianity and national development. The nature of the Christian contribution is seen not primarily in terms of the work ethic it engenders (as argued by Max Weber in the case of European capitalism) but mainly in the realm of aspirations (visions, hope) of a new society and motivation (inspiration, empowerment) to put them into effect. In other words, it was the public theology of Christianity that played a highly significant role in the modernization and revitalization of Korean society in the twentieth century.

Transformations of a ‘Religious’ Nation in a Global World: Politics, Protestantism, and Ethnic Identity in South Korea (co-authored with William Silcott)

Culture and Religion: An Interdisciplinary Journal 14 (2):223-240, 2013

In an increasingly globalised world, matters of national identity are no longer confined solely to domestic politics. This paper proposes that Christianity in South Korea is engaged in a mutually reinforcing relationship with the construction of Korean national identity, particularly concerning historical dynamics of both Westernisation and the formation of nationalism. In positioning the role of religion in the creation of a national image, the conflicts and contestations between religious groups will become politically effective. As actors in the political and religious field attempt to reflexively create an image of Korea that transcends national borders and anticipates to overcome domestic and ethnic divides, religion becomes more than an article of faith through its entanglement with national politics. By recognising the impact of Westernisation and its historical implications for this process, it becomes possible to approach the formation of Korean identity from a new angle by accounting for the efficacy of the self-reflexive image.

Vacillating between the Cold War and the Culture War: The Contemporary Predicament of the Korean Evangelical Right

Korea Journal, 2021

Since the early 21st century, conservative evangelicals in South Korea have actively engaged in contentious politics, playing a central role in organizing the right-wing social movement in civil society. At first, such politicized evangelicals, who may be dubbed as the Korean version of the Evangelical Right, conjured up the old specter of the Korean War and stood against those who, in their minds, went against the Cold War dogmata of anticommunism and pro-Americanism. Over the last two decades, however, the Korean Evangelical Right has expanded its battle line to confront other types of perceived enemies on the Culture War front, especially Islam and LGBTQ persons. By tracing the genealogy of their social movement, this paper explores the ways in which the Korean Evangelical Right finds itself in the predicament of wavering between the geopolitics of the Cold War and the global politics of the Culture War, insofar as these two wars operate on different sets of the friend-foe distinctions.

North Korean Refugees and the Politics of Evangelical Mission in the Sino-Korean Border Area

This article examines evangelical missionary work intimately tied with humanitarian aid for North Korean refugees in the Sino-North Korean border area as an emblem of South Korean churches’ North Korean mission. Based on extensive ethnographic fieldwork, with limited access to certain field sites due to local security concerns, I shed light on refugees’ religious conversion as a complex cultural project and process in which ideas of and practices for religious freedom and salvation become immensely contested in the very logic of ‘‘saving,’’ in both humanitarian and biblical terms. My primary concerns in this Chinese context are twofold: the problems of evangelical missionary works associated with universal human rights discourses and the church as an intra-ethnic contact space where refugees’ religious and social lives are pre-figured. Based on fieldwork in the Yanbian area, this ethnography discusses empirical questions about religious conversion, intra-ethnic interactions, and salvation.

Casting a Vision of Communal and Public Life of the Church for the Post-Pandemic Korean-American Churches: Focusing on Lesslie Newbigin and Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen

Fuller Korean Studies Center Symposium, 2022

I engage with Lesslie Newbigin's and Veli-Matti Kärkkainen's communion and public ecclesiologies for a pluralistic society. For the two interlocutors, the Trinitarian economy of salvation constitutes the ontological ground of a church's life in the wider society. The two scholars' ecclesiological proposals contribute to this work via similar and dissimilar approaches. Kärkkäinen advances a communal ecclesiology that celebrates irreducible particularities in unity of the Church and a public ecclesiology through critical mutual interaction with other sectors of society in the imitatio Trinitatis. Newbigin proposes the Church as the bearer of the gospel of God's kingdom that embraces creation as a whole: an apostolic ecclesiology in pursuit of the truths of God in dialogue with others in God's creation based on the cosmic Christology according to Scripture and the Christian tradition. I believe that their proposals may contribute to Korean-American churches by promoting their holistic health and sustainability. The proposals may help them enhance their socioeconomic accountability, intercultural mutual respect, and intergenerational unity, while deeply rooted in the gospel of Christ.

A historical, biblical evaluation of the comity agreement and its implication for South Korean churches' comity strategy for North Korea

2014

ABSTRACT A HISTORICAL, BIBLICAL EVALUATION OF THE COMITY AGREEMENT AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR SOUTH KOREAN CHURCHES’ COMITY STRATEGY FOR NORTH KOREA South Korean churches are on the verge of interdenominational cooperation for the reestablishment of churches in North Korea. With the anticipation of South Korean churches’ official accessibility to the North, the necessity of unity among South Korean churches has been voiced. Any evangelistic endeavors by South Korean churches directed to the North that includes excessive division, competition, and duplication will likely deter effective evangelization of North Korea. For this reason, South Korean churches are suggesting unity for the sake of the effective evangelism of North Korea. Furthermore, South Korean churches desire to employ convergent negotiations between evangelical and ecumenical churches in the spirit of global convergence among evangelicals, the World Council of Churches (WCC), and the Vatican. In this regard, South Korean churches have a similar context that historical global consultations on comity have experienced. South Korean churches have experienced a confrontational paradigm conflict/convergence between evangelicalism and ecumenism, which developed from historical comity consultations. In the meantime, South Korean churches have questioned the potential effectiveness of developing one church body in North Korea to help eliminate confusion between South Korean churches and the people of North Korea. However, this scheme is being debated. This dissertation demonstrates that South Korean churches would benefit from the historical lessons of comity by not repeating errors that the ecumenical movement brought through its pursuit of visible church unity, while sacrificing the essence of the Gospel. The writer further attempts to reveal the experience of evangelicals and their admission to ecumenical movements, and how preserving the essence of the Gospel has not been possible when attempting to create visible unity with ecumenical institutions. This dissertation argues that the attempts of visible unity among various institutions of Christendom and their compromise of biblical doctrines led to a view of the church and her unity that is antithetical to the biblical model. From this perspective, this dissertation will suggest that interdenominational cooperation among South Korean churches for the purpose of the reestablishment of churches in the North needs to be assisted by understanding the historical/biblical implications of comity. This dissertation will present strategies for maintaining historical/biblical justifications, and it attempts to prove that attaining one church body in North Korea is a strategy with no historical/biblical support. The only feasible strategy is the implementation of a method of cooperation, both historically and biblically supported, for the reestablishment of North Korean churches by adopting a comity agreement for a limited timeframe with geographic specificity, but without theological compromise or denominational unification. Incheol Mun, Ph.D. Roy Fish School of Evangelism and Missions Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2014 Supervisor: John Michael Morris, Ph.D.