Politics and the American Press: The Rise of Objectivity, 1865-1920. (original) (raw)
Related papers
The objectivity norm in American journalism*
Journalism, 2001
Why did the occupational norm of ‘objectivity’ arise in American journalism? This question has attracted the interest of many journalism historians but it has not previously been examined as an instance of a more general social phenomenon, the emergence of new cultural norms and ideals. Four conditions for the emergence of new norms are identified – two having to do with the self-conscious pursuit of internal group solidarity; and two having to do with the need to articulate the ideals of social practice in a group in order to exercise control over subordinates and to pass on group culture to the next generation. Reviewing the history of the professionalization of American journalism, this essay identifies the late 19th and early 20th century as the period when these conditions crystallized. Alternative technological and economic explanations of the emergence of objectivity are criticized and the difficulty of understanding why objectivity as a norm emerged first and most fully in t...
Reporting and the Transformations of the Journalistic Field: US News Media, 1890-2000
"How have journalistic ideals of public service arisen? To what extent do journalists live up to these ideals? Can we make any claims as to the social conditions, which this performance depends on? Using Bourdieu’s theory of fields of cultural production, this paper addresses these questions with evidence from the history of journalism in the United States. What is most distinctive about modern journalism is a specific practice: active newsgathering or reporting. This practice became common in the 1860s and 1870s with the emergence of journalism as a field with its own stakes, relatively independent from political advantage or literary merit. The power of field-specific capital to organise practices in the media has varied since then. The field consolidated in the era from 1890 to 1914, with newspapering expanding as an industry. In the interwar years, the boundary between PR and journalism became blurry and the institutional basis for active newsgathering declined. Under favorable economic and political conditions reporting practices, including local and investigative reporting, flourished between 1945 and1970 across media forms. In the past 40 years the importance of active news-gathering has declined. "
Blessed be the critics of newspapers": journalistic criticism of journalism 1865-1930
This study examined journalistic press criticism between 1865 and 1930. It sought to understand how the first modern journalists conceived of their profession in a period of great transitions. As the study revealed, journalists writing about journalism between 1865 and 1930 discussed recurring themes such as commercialization, sensationalism, advertising, and ethics. They expressed ambivalence toward the rise of big business in their field and the consequences it could have on the quality of the work. In the process, journalists also defined journalism as a profession providing a public service or as a business aiming solely for circulation and profit. Definitions shifted depending on the period during which the journalists wrote. Criticism during the period under study often reflected the social and cultural trends journalists witnessed. During the postbellum era, it mirrored the belief in the American Dream of wealth, well-being, and democracy. In the 1890s, criticism focused on the downsides of commercialism, expressing the fears people felt toward the new corporate giants. During the progressive period, the writings of press critics revealed the pride they felt in the civic services journalism provided. But World War I brought an end to progressivism. During the 1920s, disillusioned journalists criticized "mediocre" journalism. Their frustration echoed that of the old generation of progressives. Underlying the journalists" criticism was also the perception they had of news. Excited about the democratic promise of this new concept, postbellum critics praised journalism more than they criticized it. During the 1890s, and despite the downsides of commercialism, journalists never lost hope because, for them, news democratized information. The progressive period seemed to confirm the democratic potentials of news, promoting pride among critics. But the v propaganda campaigns of World War I broke the spell, as critics realized that news was potentially susceptible to propaganda. The establishment of public relations as a profession based on the spinning of news during the 1920s further aggravated the problem. Journalists, who had kept their optimism throughout the previous fifty years, became concerned, in the 1920s, that many newspapers did not live up to the democratic promise of the press.
From Fama and Ossa to the Modern Doctrine of Objectivity in American Journalism
Issues in Journalism, Education, Linguistics, 2024
The aim of this article is to trace the origins of the doctrine of objectivity in Western journalism. In modern perceptions, news should be an accurate and fair account of real events. However, this has not always been the case. In the days of European antiquity, there was no clear distinction between authen-tic reports and rumors and hearsay. The notion of "news" in the modern sense simply did not exist. The first step towards the rise of objectivity doctrine was the emergence of the collection and distribution of news as a self-maintaining occupation. This development is probably best captured in "De Relationibus Novellis", the dissertation written in 1690 by Tobias Peucer at the University of Leipzig. The next stage was the coming into being in the nineteenth century of a «journalistic method» that involves the pur-suit of independently verifiable facts about current events through enterprise, observation, and investi-gation. The final step was the emergence of the first ethical codes of journalism in the early 20th centu-ry. The principles established in these codes formed the basis for the doctrine of objectivity or set of rules designed to provide "the best obtainable version of the truth" in news reporting.
Edo Journal of Arts Management and Social Science, 2020
The media exert a great deal of influence on their audience, for this reason, some media owners who are politicians, or who have political party affiliations, may make a section of the media to compromise objectivity in their reportage. Therefore, for a period of three months, this study examined the news reportage pattern of three newspapers, The Nation (owned by a politician), The Pointer (owned by the government of an opposition party), and Vanguard, a privately owned newspaper which served as the 'control'. Content Analysis research method was used to determine if their reports were objective. The study was premised on the Libertarian theory. The research established that most of the reports were daubed with political colouration in favour of the owner(s) of the newspapers` outfits, their political parties, and political party members; majority of these reports were subtle or outright condemnation of their presumed "opponents" or "enemies" as the case may be. This study recommended that Journalists should be professional in their reportage, and endeavour to do away with bias and propaganda when performing their duties. Also, Journalists should give all it takes to adhere to their professional ethics and refuse to be willing tools in the hands of politicians who would want to use them to lubricate their selfish propaganda wheels, and they must adopt self-censorship in the practice of their profession in order to avoid publishing anything outside the truth, sensational or bias.
"Bright and Inviolate": Editorial–Business Divides in Early Twentieth-Century Journalism Textbooks
In the twentieth century, in the United States, ideas of professional practice in journalism and journalism education grew up together. Occupational norms and professional practices were inscribed in reporting textbooks, which reflected the values of their era. They show a continuity of praxis, and an “enduring ethos” of journalistic values that survived into the 1960s and 1970s, in time to be picked up by the studies of Johnstone and then later Weaver and Wilhoit. This ethos including notions of public service, often tied to notions of objectivity, accuracy and fairness. This study includes a close reading of 34 textbooks published over a period of nearly 70 years, from the 1890s through the 1960s, drawing from a larger corpus of material that includes 69 textbooks from the same period. As sites of professional discourse making and continuity, textbooks show how journalism's values are passed down through time.
Objectivity and the Role of Journalism in Democratic Societies
2015
In this essay, I argue that the institution of journalism plays a vital role in informing citizens of a deliberative democratic society, and that to effectively fulfill this role, journalists must report the news objectively. I first examine the historical evolution of objectivity as it pertains to journalism. Then, I elaborate on some of the philosophical concepts that provide the foundation for objectivity. Next, I introduce John Rawls' idea of public reason, which provides an improved understanding of the role of journalism within a democratic society. I claim from this that journalism must re-envision its role as guardian of the public political forum. Finally, I bring these various discussions together by drawing in the requirements that Stephen Ward lays out in his theory of pragmatic objectivity, and argue that these are necessary to help journalism legitimize its authority to safeguard this forum. In doing so, journalism can ensure both that citizens are objectively informed and that the public forum offers them a sphere in which they can effectively participate in the governance of their democracy.