Elucidating Influences on Superior‐Subordinate Communication: Attributional Confidence and Organizational Control Expectancies (original) (raw)
Related papers
Structuring constraints on perceptions of upward influence and supervisory relationships
Southern Communication Journal, 1994
This research examined the effects of centralization of authority on employees' perceptions of the likelihood of attempting upward influence and their perceptions of supervisory trust and leadermember exchange. Three hundred and sixty-two employees from five different organizations responded to a questionnaire that assessed perceptions of centralization, attitudes toward upward influence, leader-member exchange, and supervisory trust. Consistent with earlier formulations, centralization was operationalized as perceptions of participation in decision making and job autonomy (Hage, 1980; Hage & Aiken, 1967). Results revealed that both job autonomy and participation in decision making significantly affect subordinates' attitudes toward attempting upward influence and the levels of trust and leader-member exchange they report concerning their supervisory relationship. The results are used to support the argument that centralization of authority acts as a structuring process in organizations to the extent that it constrains and most likely sustains variation in supervisory relational quality and attitudes toward attempting upward influence. My biggest problem is getting my employees to tell me what they think.-Middle-level manager, IBM In puzzling over why her employees resist sharing thoughts and opinions when invited, this manager is revealing that a supervisor who intends to be participative may still have difficulty acquiring needed information. Simply because employees are invited to participate in organizational decisions does not mean that they will do so. The privately held
The Role of Locus of Control in Leader Influence BEHAVIOR1
1984
This study investigated whether the leader's locus of control moderated the relationship between perceived leader influence behaviors and certain subordinate outcome variables. The results showed that locus of control did significantly moderate the effect of supervisor influence on productivity and subordinate satisfaction with supervision. The difference in satisfaction with supervision was more extreme at high levels of subordinate perceived supervisor influence on productivity. Implications for supervisor training are discussed. ATTRIBUTION theory in general, and locus of control in particular, has emerged in recent years as an important theoretical foundation and unit of analysis in the study and research of organizational behavior. Although very popular in behavioral science research as a whole, only relatively few of the well over 600 studies on locus of control are related to attitudinal, motivational, and behavioral variables in organizarional settings (Spector, 1982). The purpose of this study is to increase the understanding of locus ' The research program leading to this paper was supported in part by the Organizational Effectiveness Research Group, Office of Naval Research (Code 442). under Contract No. NOOO14-80-C-0554; NR 170-913 (Fred Luthans. principal investigator).
THE ROLE OF LOCUS OF CONTROL IN LEADER INFLUENCE BEHAVIOR
Personnel Psychology, 1984
This study investigated whether the leader's locus of control moderated the relationship between perceived leader influence behaviors and certain subordinate outcome variables. The results showed that locus of control did significantly moderate the effect of supervisor influence on productivity and subordinate satisfaction with supervision. The difference in satisfaction with supervision was more extreme at high levels of subordinate perceived supervisor influence on productivity. Implications for supervisor training are discussed.
Journal of Management Control
Little attention has been directed towards the role of gender in the supervisor-subordinate dyad that is the very fundament of management control. We argue that gender roles and the roles implied in the supervisor-subordinate relationship are powerful concepts that need to be incorporated in research to better understand the reactions and perceptions of management controls. The article contributes to this line of research by developing and testing hypotheses related to gender differences in supervisor-subordinate dyads and the resulting perceptions of evaluation fairness and trust in management under a tight control regime. In a vignette experiment where only the name of the supervisor was changed to a typical female or male name for female and male subordinates (respondents)(2 × 2), we find that female (male) subordinates demonstrate more negative (positive) attitudes towards evaluation fairness and that male subordinates with a female supervisor put more trust in management than males with a male supervisor and females with a female supervisor.
Control as a Driver of Trust in the Organization?
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
The aim of this paper is to explore whether the organizational control system is positively or negatively related to employees' and managers' trust in the organization. To this end we conduct two studies. In our first survey study among 600 managers and professional employees from several European countries we find formal control to be strongly and positively related to trust in the organization. subsequently performed a qualitative study among different participants drawn from the same population where we tested whether and how control issues would come up in relation to trust if respondents were not prompted.
Communication Research Reports, 1998
This^study examined the relationship between subordinate perceptions of supervisor communication skills (Le., communicator competence, communicative adaptability, interaction involvement) and.jt^ordiriatejevel of organizational identification. Participants were 135 undergraduate college students who reported on their summer work experience. Results indicated that (a) supervisor communication competence is the only significant predictor of subordinate organizational identification and (b) subordinates mth high levels of identification view their supervisors as being more competent communicators and more involved in interactions than subordinates unth moderate or low levels of identification.
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2010
- 'Understanding the relationship between span of control and subordinate consensus in leader-member exchange.', European journal of work and organizational psychology., 19 (3). pp. 388-406. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.This is an electronic version of an article published in Schyns, B. and Maslyn, J.M. and Weibler, J. (2010) 'Understanding the relationship between span of control and subordinate consensus in leader-member exchange.', European journal of work and organizational psychology., 19 (3). pp. 388-406. European journal of work and organizational psychology is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/ with the open URL of your article.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2005
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n'arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à
Formal Control and TrustworthinessShall the Twain Never Meet?
Group & Organization Management, 2007
In this article, a framework is provided for analyzing conditions that lead to positive or negative relations between trustworthiness and formal control in the context of manager-subordinate relationships, a domain often discussed controversially in the literature. In analyzing the relationship between managerial formal control and subordinates' trustworthiness, the author draws on self-determination theory. Self-determination theory is useful in showing how to link characteristics of organizational regulation (i.e., managerial formal control) with individual intentions (i.e., subordinates' intentions to behave in a trustworthy fashion). Subsequently, empirical findings related to formal control and trustworthiness are integrated into this framework to deduce a set of propositions that can be tested in the future.