The Evolution of Western Aid for Palestinian Civil Society: Bypassing Local Knowledge and Resources (original) (raw)
Related papers
Civil society in the context of Arab world: Conceptual Understanding
2021
Civil society is one of the most contested, ominous, and ambiguous concepts in social sciences. It is contested because it means many things to different intellectuals at the same time. Because of different and even contested views, the notion of civil society has become ambiguous. As a result, it is difficult to attain a united and an integrated understanding of civil society. One of the problems surrounded the analysis of civil society is to adopt universalist view and supposing that civil society “should” have similar features in all contexts. International agencies deal with civil society in developing countries as a metaphor of west. However, developing countries, such as Arab states has different historical trajectories of the civil society developments. In contrast to the universalist understanding of civil society, there is a contextual perception, according to which civil society is embedded in a meaningful mixture of political, social, and historical place. In other words,...
Civil society, autonomy and donors: international aid to Palestinian NGOs
2006
R o b e r t S c h u m a n C e n t r e f o r A d v a n c e d S t u d i e s Mediterranean Programme Series Abstract This paper offers an alternative approach to civil society by stressing the potential tension that might arise in the case of transnational civil society promotion. It analyses the historical evolution of the category of international donors, their ways of conceiving of civil society promotion in the case of the Palestinian territories and the way aid is given to local NGOs. It demonstrates that donors are far from being a homogenous category and that, despite the increasingly professionalized apparatus behind civil society promotion, donors' visions of civil society might actually be one of the reasons for the difficult democratisation of the Arab countries.
This article explores perceived shifts in roles for NGOs and religious actors after the creation of the Palestinian National Authority with the 1993 Oslo Accords, using original data from a survey of more than 1,000 community members in the West Bank and Gaza. The survey data show a centralisation of requests for assistance from the Palestinian National Authority, with a decrease in requests from local government, NGOs, and religious actors after the creation of the Palestinian National Authority. The support the empirical findings lend to theories of government and voluntary failure is discussed. Cet article traite de l’évolution perçue des rôles pour les ONG et les acteurs religieux après la création de l'Autorité nationale palestinienne avec les Accord d'Oslo de 1993, en utilisant des données originales tirées d'une enquête menée auprès de plus de 1 000 membres de communautés de Cisjordanie et de Gaza. Les données de cette enquête montrent une centralisation des demandes d'aide émanant de l'Autorité nationale palestinienne, et une diminution des demandes émanant des entités gouvernementales locales, des ONG et des acteurs religieux après la création de l'Autorité nationale palestinienne. Le fait que ces résultats empiriques soutiennent les théories concernant l’échec des gouvernements et des entités volontaires fait l'objet d'une discussion. Con base en información original aportada por una encuesta aplicada a más de mil habitantes de Cisjordania y de Gaza, el presente artículo examina los cambios que estos perciben en el rol desempeñado por las ong y los actores religiosos tras la creación de la anp a partir de los Acuerdos de Oslo de 1993. En este sentido, la información obtenida revela que, una vez formada la anp, las solicitudes de asistencia se centralizaron en esta, produciéndose, al mismo tiempo, el decremento de solicitudes provenientes del gobierno local, de las ong y de los actores religiosos. Al respecto, el artículo examina hasta qué punto los hallazgos empíricos apoyan las teorías de gobierno y del fracaso voluntario.
Analysis of Indicators to Measure Palestinian Civil Society According to the Civicus Approach
Neuro Quantology, 2022
The study aims to analyze indicators to measure Palestinian civil society according to the Civicus approach, to achieve this aim; the study drew on four key indicators for measuring civil society adopted by the Civicus approach. Firstly, the enabling environment in which civil society organizations operate, secondly, the civil society structure, thirdly, the values that lead civil society organizations in their work, and fourthly the effect of civil society organizations. The study's findings regarding the first indicator highlighted the fact that civil society in the Palestinian situation is different from other civil societies in the world. The enabling environment in which it operates, whether economic, political, social, or legal, has been affected by society's subjection to an environment under occupation. Regarding the second indicator, the study found that the structure of Palestinian society suffers from weak internal management systems and unclear responsibilities. Regarding the third indicator, the study concluded that Palestinian civil society had an impact in spreading positive values before the Oslo accords; however, Palestinian civil society had not the same influence, especially, after the division between Hamas and Fatah. As for the fourth indicator, the study found that it did not have the financial ability to sustain some of its components that depend on external financing and noticed a weakness in its ability to network.
PALESTINE: OTHER ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION
“Civil society” is a term that became popularized at the end of the Cold War to describe what appeared to have been missing in state-dominated societies, broad societal participation in and concern for governance, but not necessarily government. Civil society is thought to be the necessary ingredient for democratic governance to arise. NGOs are one part of civil society. While it is often argued that NGOs are the voice of the people, representing grassroots democracy, a counter argument is made that NGOs have tended to reinforce, rather than counter, existing power structures, having members and headquarters that are primarily in the rich northern countries. Some also believe that NGO decision-making does not provide for responsible, democratic representation or accountability. NGOs themselves can be local, national, or international. Sometimes international NGOs are referred to as INGOs. Historically, most NGOs accredited to the UN Economic and Social Council have been international, but contrary to the popular wisdom, even the first group of NGOs accredited to ECOSOC in the 1940s included some national NGOs.