Metrics for pitch collections (original) (raw)

Abstract

Models of the perceived distance between pairs of pitch collections are a core component of broader models of the perception of tonality as a whole. Numerous different distance measures have been proposed, including voice-leading, psychoacoustic, and pitch and interval class distances; but, so far, there has been no attempt to bind these different measures into a single mathematical framework, nor to incorporate the uncertain or probabilistic nature of pitch perception (whereby tones with similar frequencies may, or may not, be heard as having the same pitch). To achieve these aims, we embed pitch collections in novel multi-way expectation arrays, and show how metrics between such arrays can model the perceived dissimilarity of the pitch collections they embed. By modeling the uncertainties of human pitch perception, expectation arrays indicate the expected number of tones, ordered pairs of tones, ordered triples of tones and so forth, that are heard as having any given pitch, dyad of pitches, triad of pitches, and so forth. The pitches can be either absolute or relative (in which case the arrays are invariant with respect to transposition). We provide a number of examples that show how the metrics accord well with musical intuition, and suggest some ways in which this work may be developed.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (10)

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Castrén, M. (1994). RECREL: A Similarity Measure for Set-classes. Helsinki: Sibelius Academy.
  3. Milne, A. J. (2009). A psychoacoustic model of harmonic cadences. Master's Thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Music, Jyväskylä.
  4. Moore, B. C., Glasberg, B. R., & Shailer, M. J. (1984). Frequency and intensity difference limens for harmonics with complex tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75 (2), 500-561.
  5. Parncutt, R. (1989). Harmony: A psychoacoustical approach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  6. Roederer, J. G. (1994). The Physics and Psychophysics of Music. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  7. Sethares, W. A., Milne, A. J., Tiedje, S., Prechtl, A., & Plamondon, J. (2009). Spectral tools for Dynamic Tonality and audio morphing. Computer Music Journal, 33 (2).
  8. Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., & Seewann, M. (1982). Pitch of complex signals according to virtual-pitch theory: Tests, examples, and predictions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71 (3), 671-678.
  9. Tymoczko, D. (2006). Supporting online material for the geometry of musical chords. Science, 313 (72).
  10. Zwicker, E., & Fastl, H. (1999). Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Berlin: Springer.