Local Government Decision Making on Urban Development: A Case study of the City of Utrecht, The Netherlands (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 2019
The Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda recognise the role of cities in achieving sustainable development. However, these agendas were agreed and signed by national governments and thus implementing them at the local level requires a process of adaptation or localisation. In this paper, we analyse five aspects that practitioners and researchers need to consider when localising them: (1) delimitation of the urban boundary; (2) integrated governance; (3) actors; (4) synergies and trade-offs and (5) indicators. These considerations are interrelated, and while not exhaustive, provide an important initial step for reflection on the challenges and opportunities of working with these global agendas at the local level. The paper draws on the inception phase of an international comparative transdisciplinary research project in seven cities on four continents: Buenos Aires (Argentina), Cape Town (South Africa), Gothenburg (Sweden), Kisumu (Kenya), Malmö (Sweden), Sheffield (UK) and Shimla (India).
Principles for Integrating the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in Cities
The implementation of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals in the urban centres of the world is one of the most consequential and ambitious projects that the nations of the world have undertaken. Guidance for achieving the goals in an integrated way that creates true sustainability is currently lacking because of the wicked nature of the problem. However, its wickedness highlights the critical importance of governance and decision-making processes for such integration, including the relationship between governments and their citizens. In particular, there is strong evidence to suggest that managing wicked problems like the SDGs is best done through forms of democracy that are deliberative, representative and influential. Called "deliberative democracy", we draw on an existing body of research and case studies of deliberative democracy in action to apply its principles to a step-by-step process for the implementation and integration of the Goals in Cities. The paper concludes with the beginnings of a framework based on deliberative democratic principles, and an outline of methods for the scaling and expansion of the implementation process to cope with the global nature of the problem.
Cities on the agenda: Urban governance and sustainable development
2016
2014 (3.88 billion) 2030 (5.06 billion) Megacities > 10 mill. 453 mill. (12 percent) 759 mill. (15 percent) Large cities 5-10 mill. 300 mill. (8 percent) 400 mill. (9 percent) Medium cities 1-5 mill. 827 mill. (21 percent) 1.100 mill. (22 percent) Small cities 300,000-1 mill. 521 mill. (13 percent) 828 mill. (16 percent) <300,000 1.670 mill. (43 percent) 1.920 mill.
The future of sustainable cities: governance, policy and knowledge
Local Environment
The aim of this special issue is to address a conceptual and empirical gap in the existing literature on sustainable cities. Uniquely, it brings together questions about the "what" (in this case, the content and representation of urban policy) of research on urban sustainability with "how" (the social organisation of knowledge and action) through the results of collaborative and comparative work. The special issue contains curated contributions that draw upon the findings of a comparative international project funded by Mistra (Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research) through the Mistra Urban Futures Centre, based in Gothenburg. The project sought to bring together two questions that are usually treated as separate in existing research approaches. They are the "what" and "how" of sustainable cities' debates. By working in partnership with local policy-makers, practitioners and universities, each local area entered into a process of collaborative design in order to examine assumptions, expectations, processes and the outcomes of knowledge co-production. This paper introduces the conceptual ideas behind this initiative and so provides a frame for the reader to situate the contributions. It then outlines those articles to draw connections between them and concludes with a short summary of what research and societal lessons can be learnt from the project.
Improved governance and sustainable urban development Strategic planning holds the key 1
2006
The recent focus on improved governance in cities has raised some concerns about the role of urban planning. Questions have been raised on whether good governance is a substitute for planning, and if it is adequate in itself to achieve sustainable development. Is there no future, then, for planning in our cities? In this article, we argue that sustainable development can become a more attainable objective in a market-oriented environment if improved governance can be linked to a strategic planning approach. Public participation in decision-making, accountability, equity and efficiency – all core principles of good urban governance - are also defining characteristics of strategic planning, and hold the key to socially, economically and environmentally sustainable development. This article uses an example from a UN-HABITAT programme in Kosovo to illustrate the impact of strategic urban planning on good urban governance and sustainable development.
2014
Basic information on SD Country profiles Quarterly reports Policy briefs Case studies Conference papers Workshop papers Getting in touch with us The European Sustainable Development Network (ESDN) is an informal network of public administrators and other experts who deal with sustainable development strategies and policies. The network covers all 27 EU Member States, plus other European countries. The ESDN is active in promoting sustainable development and facilitating the exchange of good practices in Europe and gives advice to policy-makers at the European and national levels.
Sustainable development goals for cities
It is sometimes claimed that the concept "sustainable development" can be interpreted in many different ways and therefore is difficult to operationalize and use for example in planning processes. In 2015, governments all around the world agreed on a set of Sustainable Development Goals. They are universal, connected and undividable. The goals and the document, Agenda 2030, is unique and taken together they can be seen as a global consensus on the goals for sustainable development. One of the seventeen goals is directly related to cities and urban development. For sustainable urban development it is however not enough to focus on this goal alone since important aspects are included also in other goals. In this paper we will discuss how sustainable urban development can be defined using the Agenda 2030 sustainable development goals as a starting point. Such goals are useful for example for urban planning. Experience shows that clear goals are often lacking in planning processes and that is especially so for goals related to sustainability. Goals should be relevant for different possible futures and not pending on for example uncertain specific economic developments. The focus here will be on a European and a Swedish context, but with an outlook also to other parts of the world.
In the current environment of rapid global change the role of sustainable development in cities become even more important. In addition to the traditional concerns of combating sprawl, congestion, and pollution we also need to rethink our carbon footprints and the settlement impacts of a contracting global economy that is sure to change the very paradigm in which we plan. If traditional methods (and their underlying assumptions) are becoming increasingly suspect, it is clear we need not only to consider new ways to define the problems we face but also seek better ways to solve them. This includes the infrastructure of cities. Manuel Castells’ ''network society'' (Re: M. Castells: The Information Age, Oxford 1998) suggests that the world is no longer hierarchically organized or territorially arranged, but functions on a new ''borderless'' network of economy and society. This reality has not been fully brought down to the city scale in terms of how day-...