Lingo-Rhetorical and Socio-Pragmatic Peculiarities in Political Speeches by Barack Obama (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Socio-Pragmatics Analysis of Promising Utterances in Barack Obama’s Campaign Speeches
2009
This research is aimed to answer three problems. The problems are (1) what are the linguistic forms of promise utterances, (2) what are the intentions of the promise utterances, (3) what are the reasons of the using of promise utterances in Barack Obama’s campaign speeches. This data uses documentation and observation methods to get the data. The data are promising utterances used by Barack Obama’s campaign speeches. The source of the data is the manuscript of Barack Obama’s campaign speeches published in official website of United States of America Government. To answer those problems, this research employs qualitative research method and analyzed by using socio-pragmatics analysis, especially the form of promising utterances by using theory of sentence form, the intention of the speaker by applying speech act theory, and the reason of the speaker by applying SPEAKING theory. The result of the analysis shows that first, there is one form of utterance occurred in Barack Obama’s camp...
The Communication Presentation of Barack Obama Public Speaking Style
Jurnal Ilmiah LISKI (Lingkar Studi Komunikasi)
The main idea of this research is to analyse the English modals in Obama's speech semantically. The modal auxiliaries selected for analysis include (Will, Would, Can, Could, and Should). All the modal auxiliaries are interpreted based on the framework of Coates’ (1983) semantic clusters. The qualitative method of analysis is applied into this study. The modal auxiliary of ‘can’ signifying possibility functions to evoke positive emotions and connotations in the mind of all the listeners. It highlights the possibilities that are associated with people's hopes and wishes and reminds all citizens to look on the bright side, and the persuasion form is realized through the motivation on the Obama’s speech modal auxiliaries’ words. Keywords: Obama’s, Modality, Function, Speech, Public Speaking
XLinguae, 2018
The article is devoted to the definition of the concepts "speech strategy" and "speech tactics", consideration of political media discourse as an environment for the realization of speech strategies and tactics, linguopragmatic analysis of American and British political media texts. Main political media speech strategies and tactics used by politicians in the USA and the UK are identified and described. A political media speech strategy is defined as the whole complex of speech acts carried out to realize the goals of the political dialogue in mass media. A political media speech tactic is the specific stage of political media speech strategy. It is established that political media discourse represents the environment for the realization of speech strategies and tactics. The main blocks of media political speech strategies are positioning, cooperation, and conflict strategies. The self-representation strategy is a general strategy, which implements all these block strategies.
2008
Language is produced intentionally by human beings for particular goals in communication. It functions as a means to seek for self-interest and it is related to power relations among people. They, therefore, use strategies and tactics to influence other people in order their goals can be realized. It is very interesting to investigate and analyze the ways Barack Obama as the presidential nomination from Democratic Party in the United States uses discursive tactics to influence the audiences. How does Barack Obama use Micro structural level strategies of discourse in his political speeches? What are the tactics on word structure used by Barack Obama? What are the tactics on phrasal structure used by Barack Obama? What are the tactics on expression or oral structure used by Barack Obama? What are the tactics on sentential structure used by Barack Obama? To answer the problems, the researcher adopts Critical Discourse Analysis introduced by Teun A. van Dijk about discourse structures a...
Comparative Study of Linguistic Features Used in the Inaugural Speeches of American Presidents
Language is a very useful and powerful tool for communication and especially in political discourse it is very significant. During a political speech the leader tries to express, declare, commit, emphasize or motivate the listeners by using one's ideology and power. Political personalities speak in different modes and tones and they announce their planning and aim to keep all aspects under their control and reduce the worry of the people. The aim of this paper is to identify the linguistic features used in the inaugural speeches of selected American Presidents and to analyze their functions using Critical Discourse Analysis theory proposed by Fairclough and the theory of Persuasion postulated by Aristotle. Researchers selected inaugural speeches of George W. Bush and Barack Obama. The study was an attempt to relate the inaugural discourse to the discursive social processes and to find covert ideology and power factors in the speeches. The findings revealed significant differences among the different linguistic features, discursive practices and rhetoric devices used in inaugural speeches of the two US presidents.
Analysis of Speech Act in Presidential Election Speeches
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2023
The approach to political discourse is studied based on the theory and methodology of semantics, speech act, and textual studies. Analyzing the meaning of language in the example of political speeches is of methodological importance in the field of language semantics. Since the main method of expressing speech patterns and attitudes is the specific use of vocabulary and linguistic methods, the study of attitudes expressed through language becomes a study between psycholinguistics, semantics, and language levels. Speech in real use involves not only language but also the thought processes that occur during communication. In this research article, an analysis was made on the example of a pre-election speech for the meeting in the same rural province, by the candidates for the 2021 presidential election in Mongolia.
Rhetoric and Discourse in Political Speeches
Alphabet, 2018
This research investigates the rhetoric and discourse of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono 's (henceforth SBY) and Joko Widodo's (henceforth JOKOWI) speeches related to policies and subsidy plans in increasing the price of fuel to enhance Indonesian economic recovery and development. Societies reacted differently on the speeches. One factor affecting societies' reaction is the rhetorical devices and the involvement of discourse device toward the speeches. By this fact, the goal of this research is to find out the comparison of persuasive strategies and the involvement of discourse devices toward their rhetorical speeches. In achieving this, the researcher employs descriptive qualitative research because it describes and interprets the process of research. Aristotle's theory on persuasive strategy is employed in the analysis. Moreover, Hasan and Halliday's theory of discourse is implemented in this research. The researcher finds all rhetoric strategies applied by SBY and JOKOWI. SBY mostly implements logos in his speech; meanwhile, Jokowi uses Pathos. Furthermore, SBY uses conjunction, reference and lexical cohesion; meanwhile, Jokowi uses ellipsis conjunction, reference and lexical cohesion.
applying Rhetoric on Broadcast Political Speeches
As the title suggests, the topic of this study is political rhetoric. It is an attempt to apply rhetorical theory on political speeches. Politics is an area where politicians spend much of their time speaking to others. In broadcast political speeches, using radio and TV channels, the message reaches a large number of audiences.
Discourse Analysis of the Political Speeches
2020
Political Discourse Analysis" or "PDA" plays crucial roles aiming to embrace audience's attention and motivation. By means of political discourse, the constructed contexts revealed the current information of matters purposively however the PDA isn't the merely methods of how to comprehend political language being communicated. This study aims to explore the US political speeches by two historical orators. The aim of the report is to analyze the selected political speeches by Martin Luther King, and the president of the USA, Barack Obama. The research questions are: 1) what are lexical features emerged from PDA and 2) What kinds of powers are reflected from the US political discourses. The result of the descriptive analysis divulges the similarity and diversity of the linguistic elements proposed through the three linguistic aspects: 1] cohesion, 2] pragmatic, and 3] power. The important textual examination in theses selected works is the benefit for the variety of crucial linguistic elements interpreted and explained systematically. It is said that PDA directly proclaims various dimensions of political discourse.