College Students’ Perceptions About the Plausibility of Human-Induced Climate Change (original) (raw)
Related papers
Teaching global climate change
Alan H. McGowan
Although there is strong consensus among scientists that global climate change is real and dangerous, and there is increasing belief of this among the general public, there still remains a significant gap between scientific opinion and that of the public. The academic environmental community, therefore, has a clear opportunity and responsibility to teach the facts of global climate change, particularly to non-environmental majors, those people who are the voters of the future. The article presents several ideas along these lines, and calls for a revitalized effort to teach climate change to undergraduate students.
Secondary students’ ideas about scientific concepts underlying climate change
Environmental Education Research
We present ideas about concepts underlying climate change, held by students in years 9 and 10. Misconceptions about climate change are common among students, and may be due to misconceptions about underlying concepts. To investigate this, we developed the Climate Change Concept Inventory (CCCI), and trialed it with 229 students; corroborating findings through focus group interviews. Our interview method and data analysis methods are described. Findings included overestimation of human contributions to atmospheric carbon inputs, ultra violet radiation in sunlight, and greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Students were unaware that CO2 dissolves in water, and of the role of oceans in the carbon cycle. Greenhouse gases other than CO2 were rarely known. Earth's energy balance and black body radiation were not well understood. There were misconceptions about interactions between electromagnetic radiation and atmospheric gases; and limited understanding of carbon chemistry. The CCCI is available from the corresponding author.
Science Education
Broad misconceptions about global climate change (GCC) could hinder efforts to address this large-scale problem, and curricular materials can play a substantial role in what students learn about GCC. This study examines how U.S. high school textbooks and supplemental curricular materials published between 2007 and 2012 portray the causes, consequences, and potential responses to GCC. Our data included text segments related to these topics in five science textbooks, four social studies textbooks, and eight sets of GCC supplemental materials. To analyze these text segments, we conducted several rounds of coding, first categorizing curricula by their acceptance of the human causes of GCC and then coding relevant text segments on several dimensions related to the consequences of and potential responses to GCC. Findings indicate that (1) about half the curricula portray human activity as a major cause of current climate change, (2) most curricula include information about climatic changes but few details about potentially proximal, near-term impacts of GCC, and (3) most curricula offer a narrow set of strategies for responding to GCC. These findings suggest that educators should critically examine curricular materials they use to teach about GCC and that scholars should continually examine how GCC is portrayed to youth.
Climate change: an educational proposal integrating the physical and social sciences
The scientific community has been debating climate change for at least twenty years. The EU has recommended a set of innovative reforms to science teaching, incorporating environmental issues in the scientific curriculum, answering the need for making school a place of civic education. This paper focuses on the presentation of materials designed to foster both deep understanding of the basic concepts involved in climate change as well as critical thinking for addressing some cognitive and emotional barriers that have been proved to hinder individual behavioural reactions.
Climate Change as an Integrating Context for Learning
wepaste.org
As the effects of global climate change are being observed but not yet fully understood, how can we best teach our K-12 students to examine and respond to this planet-sized problem? This research report describes evaluation results from the National Science Foundation-sponsored SPRINTT [Student Polar Research with National [and International] Teacher Training project, administered by U.S. Satellite Laboratory, Inc. In SPRINTT, students study standards-based science concepts in the context of Earth's Polar Regions and conduct their own research projects in which they analyze authentic data, collected by both western and indigenous scientists, and present their findings in the form of an online research paper. A random sample of research papers from more than 1000 students was analyzed using the program rubric to examine students' understanding of science concepts (e.g., adaptations of organisms, weather and climate); demonstration of process skills (e.g., citing evidence, drawing conclusions); and making connections to indigenous scientific knowledge and Native peoples of the Arctic. Students at the upper elementary, middle, and high school levels illustrated strong evidence of understandings of polar concepts and science process skills. These understandings and skills may help students as they become voters and decision-makers faced with socioscientific issues such as climate change.
Students’ conceptions about the greenhouse effect, global warming, and climate change
Climatic Change, 2011
The purpose of this study was to investigate students’ conceptions of the greenhouse effect, global warming, and climate change. The study was descriptive in nature and reflected a cross-age design involving the collection of qualitative data from 51 secondary students from three different schools in the Midwest, USA. These data were analyzed for content in an inductive manner to identify student’s conceptions. The categories that emerged from the students’ responses reflected different degrees of sophistication of students’ conceptions about the greenhouse effect, global warming, and climate change. Based on these findings we make curricular recommendations that build on the students’ conceptions, the IPCC Findings, the NRC (1996) science education standards, and NOAA’s climate literacy framework.
Climate Change in School: Where Does It Fit and How Ready Are We?
Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 2001
Research indicates that teachers place a high priority on climate change as a topic their students should know, but report their own knowledge as inadequate for teaching it. Students (and some teachers) seem unable to distinguish among related environmental issues, and treat general "environmentally friendly" behavior as affecting all issues. The curricular fit of global climate change is best in Earth systems oriented classrooms but opportunities exist across the curriculum; instructional materials are available, though these may not address misconceptions. Some interest groups oppose human-mediated climate change as a curriculum topic, for the same reasons they oppose public action on the problem.