Early postoperative outcomes following hepatic resection for benign liver disease in 79 consecutive patients (original) (raw)

Liver resection: 10-year experience from a single Institution

Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, 2004

BACKGROUND: Liver resection constitutes the main treatment of most liver primary neoplasms and selected cases of metastatic tumors. However, this procedure is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. AIM: To analyze our experience with liver resections over a period of 10 years to determine the morbidity, mortality and risk factors of hepatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients who underwent liver resection from January 1994 to March 2003. RESULTS: Eighty-three (41 women and 42 men) patients underwent liver resection during the study period, with a mean age of 52.7 years (range 13-82 years). Metastatic colorectal carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma were the main indications for hepatic resection, with 36 and 19 patients, respectively. Extended and major resections were performed in 20.4% and 40.9% of the patients, respectively. Blood transfusion was needed in 38.5% of the operations. Overall morbidity was 44.5%. Life-th...

The impact of expanded indications on short-term outcomes for resection of malignant tumours of the liver over a 30 year period

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2017

There are two philosophical approaches to planning liver resection for malignancy: one strives towards zero postoperative mortality by stringent selection of candidates, thus inherently limiting patients selected; the other, accepts a low yet definite postoperative mortality rate, and offers surgery to all those with potential gain in survival. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse an alternative and evolving strategy, and its impact on short-term outcomes. 3118 consecutive hepatectomies performed in 2627 patients over 3 decades (1980-2011) were analysed. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were analysed. 1528 patients (58%) were male. Colorectal liver metastases (1221 patients, 47%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (584 patients, 22%) were the most common diagnoses. Anatomical resections were performed in 2045 (66%), some form of vascular clamping was used in 2385 (72%), and blood transfusion was required in 1130 (3...

Early mortality in 100 consecutive liver resections in 96 patients with benign and malignant liver tumours

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1995

This report describes the mortality in 100 liver resections performed in 96 patients for seven benign and 93 malignant liver tumours. Repeat hepatectomy was performed in four patients who developed recurrences after the first liver resection. Two patients died within 30 days. The first was a 67-year-old man who died on the 2nd postoperative day from cardiac failure. The second was a 69-year-old man who died on the 4th postoperative day with liver failure caused by hepatic vascular ischaemia. There were four other hospital deaths at days 33, 40, 45 and 50. A 65-year-old lady died on day 40 from sepsis caused by small bowel infarction. A 30-year-old man died on the 33rd postoperative day owing to liver failure from accelerated hepatic lymphoma spread. A 71-year-old diabetic lady died on the 45th postoperative day from sepsis caused by an untreated subphrenic abscess. A 65-year-old lady died on day 50 from systemic candidiasis after adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Further r...

Postoperative morbidity and mortality after liver resection. Retrospective study on 133 patients

PubMed, 2013

Introduction: Hepatic resection had an impressive growth over time, both by broadening the range of its indications and the occurrence of changes and technical tricks in order to reduce postoperative mortality and morbidity. Material and methods: This study is a retrospective study presenting an analysis of 133 patients hospitalized in the Department of Hepatic Surgery in City Hospital Timisoara, between January 2000 and November 2011, in which a surgical intervention was performed, either for a primary hepatic tumor (benign or malignant) or a secondary liver tumor. All cases were analyzed in terms of etiopathogenesis, preoperative and intraoperative investigations, indication and type of hepatectomy performed, the surgical technique used and postoperative evolution. Results: The study group comprises 133 patients. From the whole group, 100 patients (75.19%) were diagnosed with primitive liver tumors, in 70 patients (70% of primary tumors) HCC occurring on a cirrhotic liver. Liver disease was secondary in 33 patients (24.81%), colorectal tumors being most commonly involved (19 patients). Of all liver resections, 21 (15.79%) were major hepatectomies. The remaining were minor hepatectomies, including a trisegmentectomy (V, VI, VII), 51 bisegmentectomies and 60 liver resections limited to one segment. Vascular clamping was used in 89 cases (66.92%), pedicular clamping in 65 patients (73.03%) and selective extraglissonian clamping in 24 patients (26.97%) respectively. Of the 33 patients with liver metastases, 12 (36.36%) received synchronous resections. The most common complication in our study group was postoperative liver failure, found in 45 patients (33.83%), being irreversible in one case (2.22%), followed by the death of the patient. In 34 patients (75.55%), hepatic failure was seen in cirrhotic patients and the other cases were patients with major hepatec-tomies. Hepatic failure occurred in 35 patients (77.78%) with vascular clamping, four of them after selective clamping. 31 of the patients (68.89%) with postoperative liver failure were transfused, 25 patients (55.55%) receiving more than 2 units of blood. Of all patients, 3 (2.25%) died postoperatively. Conclusions: Respecting the principles of liver surgery, hepatic resection can be performed, even in cirrhotic patients, with acceptable morbidity and minimal mortality. The most common complication after hepatic resection, in our study group, was postoperative liver failure, which was mostly reversible.

Trends in morbidity and mortality of hepatic resection for malignancy. A matched comparative analysis

Annals of …, 1994

The authors define more clearly the trends in morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection for malignant disease in matched patient groups during two discrete time periods. Summary Background Data Recent reports have shown improvement in operative morbidity and mortality associated with hepatic resection; however, results often included resections for benign disease and trauma. Furthermore, specific factors contributing to the improvement in operative risks between the last two decades have not been defined.

Resective surgery for liver tumor: a multivariate analysis of causes and risk factors linked to postoperative complications

2006

In spite of accurate selection of patients eligible for resection, and although advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management have greatly contributed to reducing the rate of perioperative deaths, stress must be placed on reducing the postoperative complication rates reported to be still as high as 50%. This study was designed to analyze the causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity on the grounds of data derived from a single-center surgical population. From September 1989 to March 2005, 287 consecutive patients, affected either with HCC or liver metastasis, had liver resection at our department. Among the HCC series we recorded 98 patients (73.2%) in Child-Pugh class A, 32 (23.8%) in class B and 4 in class C (3%). In 104 colorectal metastases, 71% were due to colon cancer, 25% rectal, 3% sigmoid, and 1% anorectal. In 49 non-colorectal metastases, 22.4% were derived from breast cancer, 63.2% gastrointestinal tumors (excluding colon) and 14...

Liver resective surgery: a multivariate analysis of postoperative outcome and complication

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2007

Introduction Notwithstanding technical advances and high experience of liver resection of specialized centers, the rate of complications after surgical resection could be high. In this study, we analyzed causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity on the ground of data derived from a single center surgical population. Materials and methods From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for Hcc and 153 consecutive patients with liver metastasis (derived from either colorectal cancer or noncolorectal cancer) at our department. We performed 22 major hepatectomy, 20 left hepatectomy, 14 trisegmentectomy, 77 bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy, 74 segmentectomy, and 80 wedge resection. Results In-hospital mortality rate was 4.5%, about 7% in Hcc cases and 2.6% in liver metastasis. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites (10%), temporary impairment liver function (19%), biliary fistula (6%), hepatic abscess (25%), hemoperitoneum (10%), and pleural effusion (30%) sometimes combined each other. Some variables, associated with the technical aspects of surgical procedure, are responsible of the rising of complication as: Pringle maneuver length of more than 20 minutes (p=0.001); the type of liver resection procedure [major hepatectomy (p=0.02), left hepatectomy (p=0.04), trisegmentectomy (p=0.04), bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy (p=0.04)]; and the request of an amount of blood transfusion of more than 600 cc (p=0.04). Also, both liver dysfunction, in particular Child A vs B and C (p=0.01), and histopathological grading (p=0.01) are associated with a high rate of postsurgical complication in Hcc cases. Conclusion We make the following recommendations: every liver resection should be planned after intraoperative ultrasonography, anatomical surgical procedure should be preferred instead of wedge resection, and modern devices should be used, like Argon Beam and Ligasure® dissector, to reduce the incidence of both intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and biliary leakage.

Liver resection is beneficial for patients with colorectal liver metastases and extrahepatic disease

Annals of Translational Medicine

Background: Liver metastases are the most common cause of death for patients with colorectal cancer and affect up to half of the patients. Liver resection is an established method that can potentially be curative. For patients with extrahepatic disease (EHD), the role of liver surgery is less established. Methods: This is a retrospective study based on data from the national quality registry SweLiv. Data were obtained between 2009 and 2015. SweLiv is a validated registry and has been in use since 2009, with coverage above 95%. Patients with liver metastases and EHD were analyzed and cross-checked against the national death cause registry for survival analysis. Results: During the study period, 2,174 patients underwent surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), and 277 patients with EHD were treated with resection or ablation. The estimated median survival time for the entire cohort from liver resection/ablation was 40 months (95% CI, 32-47). The survival time for patients treated with liver resection was 45 months compared to 26 months for patients treated with ablation (95% CI 38-53, 18-33, P=0.001). A subgroup analysis of resected patients revealed that the group with pulmonary metastases had a significantly longer estimated median survival (50 months; 95 % CI, 39-60) than the group with lymph node metastases (32 months; 95% CI, 7-58) or peritoneal carcinomatosis (28 months; 95% CI, 14-41) (P=0.022 and 0.012, respectively). Other negative prognostic factors were major liver resection and nonradical liver resection. Conclusions: For patients with liver metastases and limited EHD, liver resection results in prolonged survival compared to what can be expected from chemotherapy alone.

Central hepatectomy versus extended hepatectomy for liver malignancy: a matched cohort comparison

HPB, 2015

Objective: To compare surgical outcomes between matched central hepatectomy (CH) and extended hepatectomy (EH) groups. Background: Surgical choices for centrally located liver tumours are limited. The traditional EH harbours substantial risks, whereas CH is an alternative parenchymal-sparing resection that may improve peri-operative morbidity. Methods: A review of 4661 liver resections at a single institution was performed. The cases (CH) were matched in a 1:1 ratio with EH controls. Results: The CH group was matched for demographic, tumour and laboratory factors with either right EH or combined (right/left) EH groups (n = 63 per group). Colorectal liver metastases were the most common diagnosis occurring in 70% of the patients. Higher intra-operative blood loss was observed in the right EH(P = 0.01) and combined EH groups (P < 0.01) compared with the CH group. There was a trend towards lower 90-day morbidity in the CH group (43%) compared with the right EH(59%, P = 0.1) and combined EH groups (56%, P = 0.2). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the control groups (P < 0.01 for both). The control groups had significantly higher post-operative bilirubin and International Normalized Ratio (INR) levels compared with the CH group. A post-operative bilirubin higher than 4 mg/dl was observed in 2% of the CH group compared with 39% of the right EH group (P < 0.01) and 52% of the combined EH group (P < 0.01). No differences in the rates of bile leak/biloma, post-hepatectomy liver failure or 90-day mortality were found. Conclusions: CH, as compared with EH, was safe and associated with a shorter hospital stay and less post-operative liver dysfunction. CH should be considered in patients with centrally located tumours amenable to such a resection.

Factors affecting outcome in liver resection

HPB, 2005

Background. Studies demonstrate an inverse relationship between institution/surgeon procedural volumes and patient outcomes. Similar studies exist for liver resections, which recommend referral of patients for liver resections to 'high-volume' centers. These studies did not elucidate the factors that underlie such outcomes. We believe there exists a complex interaction of patient-related and perioperative factors that determine patient outcomes after liver resection. We sought to delineate these factors.