Ibandronate: The Evolution of a Once-a-Month Oral Therapy for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Journal of Women's Health, 2014
Several second-generation bisphosphonates (BPs) are approved in osteoporosis treatment. Efficacy and safety depends on potency of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) inhibition, hydroxyapatite affinity, compliance and adherence. The latter may be influenced by frequency and route of administration. A literature search using "ibandronate", "postmenopausal osteoporosis", "fracture", and "bone mineral density" (BMD) revealed 168 publications. The Phase III BONE study, using low dose 2.5 mg daily oral ibandronate demonstrated 49% relative risk reduction (RRR) in clinical vertebral fracture after 3 years. Non-vertebral fracture (NVF) reduction was demonstrated in a subgroup (pretreatment T-score −3.0; RRR 69%) and a metaanalysis of high annual doses (150 mg oral monthly or intravenous equivalent of ibandronate; RRR 38%). Hip fracture reduction was not demonstrated. Long-term treatment efficacy has been confirmed over 5 years. Long term safety is comparable to placebo over 3 years apart from flu-like symptoms which are more common with oral monthly and intravenous treatments. No cases of atypical femoral fracture or osteonecrosis of the jaw have been reported in randomized controlled trial studies. Ibandronate inhibits FPPS more than alendronate but less than other BPs which could explain rate of action onset. Ibandronate has a higher affinity for hydroxyapatite compared with risedronate but less than other BPs which could affect skeletal distribution and rate of action offset. High doses (150 mg oral monthly or intravenous equivalent) were superior to low doses (oral 2.5 mg daily) according to 1 year BMD change. Data are limited by patient selection, statistical power, under-dosing, and absence of placebo groups in high dose studies. Ibandronate treatment offers different doses and modalities of administration which could translate into higher adherence rates, an important factor when the two main limitations of BP treatment are initiation and adherence rates. However, lack of consistency in NVF reduction and absence of hip fracture data limits more generalized use of this agent.
Monthly Oral Ibandronate Therapy in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: 1Year Results From the MOBILE Study
2005
Once-monthly (50/50, 100, and 150 mg) and daily (2.5 mg; 3-year vertebral fracture risk reduction: 52%) oral ibandronate regimens were compared in 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. At least equivalent efficacy and similar safety and tolerability were shown after 1 year. Introduction: Suboptimal adherence to daily and weekly oral bisphosphonates can potentially compromise therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Although yet to be prospectively shown in osteoporosis, evidence from randomized clinical trials in several other chronic conditions shows that reducing dosing frequency enhances therapeutic adherence. Ibandronate is a new and potent bisphosphonate with antifracture efficacy proven for daily administration and also intermittent administration with a dose-free interval of >2 months. This report presents comparative data on the efficacy and safety of monthly and daily oral ibandronate regimens. Materials and Methods: MOBILE is a 2-year, randomized, double-blind, phase III, noninferiority trial. A total of 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were assigned to one of four oral ibandronate regimens: 2.5 mg daily, 50 mg/50 mg monthly (single doses, consecutive days), 100 mg monthly, or 150 mg monthly. Results: After 1 year, lumbar spine BMD increased by 3.9%, 4.3%, 4.1%, and 4.9% in the 2.5, 50 /50, 100, and 150 mg arms, respectively. All monthly regimens were proven noninferior, and the 150 mg regimen superior, to the daily regimen. All monthly regimens produced similar hip BMD gains, which were larger than those with the daily regimen. All regimens similarly decreased serum levels of C-telopeptide, a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Compared with the daily regimen, a significantly larger proportion of women receiving the 100 and 150 mg monthly regimens achieved predefined threshold levels for percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (6%) or total hip BMD (3%). All regimens were similarly well tolerated. Conclusions: Monthly ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as the currently approved daily ibandronate regimen in postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2006
Background: Reducing bisphosphonate dosing frequency may improve suboptimal adherence to treatment and therefore therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Once-monthly oral ibandronate has been developed to overcome this problem. Objective: To confirm the 1 year results and provide more extensive safety and tolerability information for once-monthly dosing by a 2 year analysis. Methods: MOBILE, a randomised, phase III, non-inferiority study, compared the efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate with daily ibandronate, which has previously been shown to reduce vertebral fracture risk in comparison with placebo. Results: 1609 postmenopausal women were randomised. Substantial increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) were seen in all treatment arms: 5.0%, 5.3%, 5.6%, and 6.6% in the daily and oncemonthly groups (50 + 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg), respectively. It was confirmed that all once-monthly regimens were at least as effective as daily treatment, and in addition, 150 mg was found to be better (p,0.001). Substantial increases in proximal femur (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter) BMD were seen; 150 mg produced the most pronounced effect (p,0.05 versus daily treatment). Independent of the regimen, most participants (70.5-93.5%) achieved increases above baseline in lumbar spine or total hip BMD, or both. Pronounced decreases in the biochemical marker of bone resorption, sCTX, observed in all arms after 3 months, were maintained throughout. The 150 mg regimen consistently produced greater increases in BMD and sCTX suppression than the 100 mg and daily regimens. Ibandronate was well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events across groups. Conclusions: Once-monthly oral ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as daily treatment. Once-monthly administration may be more convenient for patients and improve therapeutic adherence, thereby optimising outcomes.
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Weekly Ibandronate in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Adherence to oral daily bisphosphonate regimens in postmenopausal osteoporosis is currently suboptimal. Less frequent dosing regimens are likely to improve patient adherence and thus, potentially, patient outcomes. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study was conducted in 235 women (53-80 yr old; time since menopause > 3 yr) with postmenopausal osteoporosis [lumbar spine (L1-L4) bone mineral density (BMD) T-score < ؊2] to demonstrate the noninferiority of an oral weekly (20 mg) ibandronate regimen compared with an oral daily (2.5 mg) ibandronate regimen. All patients received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU). The primary analysis was the relative change in lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD from baseline after 48 wk in the per-protocol population. Daily and weekly ibandronate significantly increased spinal BMD by 3.47 and 3.53%, respectively, and provided substantial and similar decreases in biochemical markers of bone turnover. In the primary analysis, noninferiority of the weekly regimen to the daily regimen was demonstrated, with the boundary of the one-sided confidence interval, ؊0.96%, within both the ؊1.65% prespecified margin and a more stringent margin of ؊1.10%. These results demonstrate that oral weekly ibandronate provides the same efficacy and safety as oral daily ibandronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2004
Oral daily (2.5 mg) and intermittent ibandronate (between-dose interval of >2 months), delivering a similar cumulative exposure, were evaluated in 2946 osteoporotic women with prevalent vertebral fracture. Significant reduction in incident vertebral fracture risk by 62% and 50%, respectively, was shown after 3 years. This is the first study to prospectively show antifracture efficacy for the intermittent administration of a bisphosphonate.
Three monthly intravenous injections of ibandronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis
The American journal of medicine, 1997
Oral treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates relies on compliance, the absorption being low and suppressed by simultaneous food intake. Intravenous (IV) treatment with an aminobisphosphonate, pamidronate (once every 3 months) was effective, but required infusions. Ibandronate, a new very potent aminobisphosphonate, can be administered safely as an IV bolus injection, and therefore offers an interesting alternative suitable for outpatient treatment. To test the efficacy of this bolus IV treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis in randomized partly double-blind, placebo controlled study, 125 postmenopausal women (mean age, 64 years) with osteoporosis (bone mineral density [BMD] < -2.5 SD T score) received a placebo or ibandronate (0.25, 0.5, 1, or 2 mg) every 3 months. All patients received 1 g calcium/day. BMD, in g/cm2, was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at all standard sites. Lumbar spine BMD (L2 to L4) did not change (0.85%) in the placebo group, but increa...
Oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis: a review
Current Therapeutic Research, 1995
Osteoporosis is characterized by decreased bone mass and disrupted bone architecture, which reduce bone strength and increase the risk of fracture. Bisphosphonates, although poorly absorbed from the gut when given orally, are preferentially localized to the skeleton where they inhibit bone resorption. This provides the rationale for their use in the treatment of diseases of high bone turnover, such as Paget's disease and hypercalcemia of malignancy. The antiresorptive action of bisphosphonates is also useful in the management of osteoporosis, in which the rate of bone resorption exceeds that of bone formation. Cyclical etidronate and alendronate are the most extensively studied bisphosphonates in the management of osteoporosis, but limited data are also available for pamidronate, clodronate, tiludronate, and risedronate. All bisphosphonates have a similar rate of action, and their efficacy in increasing spinal bone mass in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is broadly comparable over 2 to 3 years. The increase in spinal bone mass achieved with cyclical etidronate is associated with at least a 50% decrease in vertebral fracture rate, which is comparable to that seen with hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, and, in preliminary data, for alendronate. Both cyclical etidronate and alendronate increase hip bone mass in patients with osteoporosis. The long-term safety data available for cyclical etidronate are generally favorable; clinical osteomalacia has not been experienced with the cyclical regimen during 7 years of treatment. Comparable long-term safety data are not yet available for the other bisphosphonates. The most common adverse events with oral bisphosphonate treatment are mild gastrointestinal disturbances, with an incidence rate generally similar to that with placebo and/or calcium. There have been reports, however, of erosive esophagitis during treatment with oral pamidronate and a higher incidence of abdominal pain during treatment with alendronate than with placebo and/or calcium; both of these compounds are amino bisphosphonates. Extensive experience with cyclical etidronate has established its long-term efficacy and safety. Long-term data are needed for the newer bisphosphonates, in order to position them correctly alongside the various other therapeutic options available for the successful management of osteoporosis.
The Journal of rheumatology, 2008
OBJECTIVE An effective and well tolerated intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate could provide a new treatment method for patients with osteoporosis. The Dosing IntraVenous Administration (DIVA) study was designed to identify the optimal ibandronate IV injection schedule for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis by comparing the efficacy and tolerability of 2- and 3-monthly injections with the previously evaluated daily oral ibandronate regimen. We report the effects on lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density (BMD) and bone resorption markers over 2 years. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority study recruited 1395 women (aged 55-80 yrs; > or = 5 yrs since menopause) with osteoporosis [mean lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD T-score < -2.5 and > or = -5.0]. Patients received IV ibandronate (2 mg every 2 mo or 3 mg every 3 mo) plus daily oral placebo, or 2.5 mg daily oral ibandronate plus 2- or 3-monthly IV placebo. Supplemental vitamin D (400...
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2015
Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the most commonly used medications for osteoporosis. This ASBMR report provides guidance on BP therapy duration with a risk benefit perspective. Two trials provided evidence for long-term BP use. In the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX), postmenopausal women receiving alendronate for 10 years had fewer clinical vertebral fractures than those switched to placebo after 5 years. In the HORIZON extension, women who received 6 annual infusions of zoledronic acid had fewer morphometric vertebral fractures compared with those switched to placebo after 3 years. Low hip T-score, between -2 and -2.5 in FLEX and below -2.5 in HORIZON extension, predicted a beneficial response to continued therapy. Hence, the Task Force suggests that after 5 years of oral BP or 3 years of intravenous BP, reassessment of risk should be considered. In women at high risk, for example, older women, those with a low hip T-score or high fracture risk score, those with pr...
Bone, 2011
A candidate identification questionnaire (CIQ) was tested to determine its predictive value for patient-reported satisfaction in patients switched from once-weekly or once-daily treatment with a bisphosphonate to once-monthly dosing. This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter international study in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis who had been receiving once-daily or once-weekly alendronate or risendronate for at least 3 months. Patients completed a CIQ, then commenced 150 mg monthly ibandronate for 6 months. Patients completed the Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q TM ) at baseline for 6 months. Scores were converted to composite satisfaction scores (CSS, scale 0 -100). Totally 677 patients completed a CIQ, 645 were enrolled in the treatment phase and comprised the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, and 630 completed the study. In the ITT population, 68.1% patients answered "yes" to one or more CIQ questions. OPSAT-Q scores increased for the convenience, quality of life and overall satisfaction domains (p < 0.001). Decreases in scores for the side effects domains were significant (p < 0.001) in the CIQ "yes" group, but not for the degree of bother (decrease in mean of 0.1 points, p = 0.50) or duration (no change, p = 0.84) of non-gastrointestinal side effects. Of 638 patients who completed the preference questionnaire, 93.0% of patients preferred the once-monthly dosing schedule and 563 patients (90.7%) found it more convenient. The most common adverse events were dyspepsia (1.9%), nausea (1.1%), and upper abdominal pain (0.9%). Patients are likely to prefer treatment with monthly ibandronate to a weekly or monthly bisphosphonate irrespective of their stated preference before switching treatment.