The Role of Mobility in Offsetting Inequality: A Nonparametric Exploration of the CPS (original) (raw)
Related papers
A quantile analysis of intergenerational income mobility in the US (1980-2010)
2014
Using family income from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we apply Quantile Regression to estimate the Intergenerational Income Elasticity (IGE) by percentiles in the U.S. from 1980 to 2010. For the whole period, the IGE shows a Ushape across the income distribution, with maximum values at the tails (0.66 at the 10th percentile and 0.48 at the 90th percentile) and a minimum value {highest mobility- of 0.37 at the 70th percentile. These values contrast with the Ordinary Least Square estimate, which is 0.47. The trend evolution of the IGE varies also across the income distribution. While for all percentiles up to the median (and OLS) the trend of IGE was decreasing in the 80s and 90s and slightly increasing in the 00s, the IGE remained relatively stable for the richer along the whole period. With respect to the channels of intergenerational income transmission, son’s education and race were found to be important.
The research program of the Center for Economic Studies (CES) produces a wide range of economic analyses to improve the statistical programs of the U.S. Census Bureau. Many of these analyses take the form of CES research papers. The papers have not undergone the review accorded Census Bureau publications and no endorsement should be inferred. Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Census Bureau. All results have been reviewed to ensure that no confidential information is disclosed. Republication in whole or part must be cleared with the authors. To obtain information about the series, see www.census.gov/ces or contact J.
Is High Inequality Offset by Mobility
Unpublished paper, 2008
The United States is the most unequal affluent country. It has the highest level of earnings inequality among employed individuals and the highest level of posttaxposttransfer income inequality among households (Kenworthy 2004, 2008; Pontusson 2005; Brandolini and Smeeding 2006; Burniaux, Padrini, and Brandt 2006). But these conclusions are based on single-year snapshots of the population. Many believe that the United States also has more mobility of earnings and income than other countries ⎯ that is, individuals move up and down in the distribution with greater frequency and to a greater extent. If this is true, inequality of long-run ("permanent") earnings and income in the United States may be comparable to or perhaps even less than in other countries. A number of researchers have examined the degree to which multiple-year inequality differs from single-year inequality (Burkhauser and Poupore 1997;
Policy Implications of New Data on Income Mobility
The Economic Journal, 1999
The existence of income mobility may moderate concerns about growing inequalities, espe-cially if income mobility has increased. However, the evidence for rising mobility is equivocal, and its extent is not enough to offset the growth of cross-sectional inequality. ...
On the Measurement of Long-Term Income Inequality and Income Mobility
2009
This paper proposes a two-step aggregation method for measuring long-term income inequality and income mobility, where mobility is defined as an equalizer of long-term income. The first step consists of aggregating the income stream of each individual into a measure of permanent income, which accounts for the costs associated with income fluctuations and allows for credit market imperfections. The second
Are Earnings Inequality and Mobility Overstated? The Impact of Nonclassical Measurement Error
Review of Economics and Statistics, 2010
Measures of inequality and mobility based on self-reported earnings re ‡ect attributes of both the joint distribution of earnings across time and the joint distribution of measurement error and earnings. While classical measurement error would increase measures of inequality and mobility there is substantial evidence that measurement error in earnings is not classical. In this paper we present the analytical links between non-classical measurement error and measures of inequality and mobility. The empirical importance of non-classical measurement error is explored using the Survey of Income and Program Participation matched to tax records. We …nd that the e¤ects of non-classical measurement error are large. However, these non-classical e¤ects are largely o¤setting when estimating mobility. As a result SIPP estimates of mobility are similar to estimates based on tax records, though SIPP estimates of inequality are smaller than estimates based on tax records.
Intergenerational Mobility: Trends Across the Earnings Distribution
The analysis, based on register data for Norwegian cohorts born 1950, 1955, and 1960, shows that the intergenerational earnings mobility is high. Using quantile regression, mobility is found to be lower at the lower end of the earnings distribution than at the upper end. The findings also indicate that mobility increases over time and that the increase seems to be somewhat higher for lower earnings. Finally, we find that the increase in earnings mobility over time has been larger for women than for men.
United States Earnings Dynamics: Inequality, Mobility, and Volatility
NBER Chapters, 2020
Using data from the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) infrastructure files, we study changes over time and across sub-national populations in the distribution of real labor earnings. We consider four large MSAs (Detroit, Los Angeles, New York, and San Francisco) for the period 1998 to 2017, with particular attention paid to the subperiods before, during, and after the Great Recession. For the four large MSAs we analyze, there are clear national trends represented in each of the local areas, the most prominent of which is the increase in the share of earnings accruing to workers at the top of the earnings distribution in 2017 compared with 1998. However, the magnitude of these trends varies across MSAs, with New York and San Francisco showing relatively large increases with Los Angeles somewhere in the middle relative to Detroit whose total real earnings distribution is relatively stable over the period. Our results contribute to the emerging literature on differences between national and regional economic outcomes, exemplifying what will be possible with a new data exploration tool-the Earnings and Mobility Statistics (EAMS) web application-currently under development at the U.S. Census Bureau. Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the US Census Bureau or other sponsors. All results have been reviewed to ensure that no confidential information is disclosed (DRB clearance number CBDRB-FY20-CED006-0013).