The General Aggression Model: Theoretical Extensions to Violence (original) (raw)
Related papers
Current Opinion in Psychology, 2018
The study of human aggression has led to the development of many theoretical explanations. Although these theories provide excellent explanations of aggression in specific domains, they are lacking in generality. The general aggression model (
Psychological Theories Of Aggression. Critical Perspective
Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 2020
The present article, which is completely theoretical, with no attempts at empirical verification, presents several theories of aggression and aggressive behaviour, in an attempt to offer a critical perspective on them. Following G. Moser's classification, four major conceptions regarding aggressive behaviour shall be placed under analysis: instinctual theories – consider that aggression is a manifestation of an innate impulse or instinct; reactive theories – consider aggressive behaviour as a reaction to frustrating, unpleasant situations; theories of learning – according to which aggressive behaviour is a behaviour acquired through different mechanisms, such as learning through imitation and / or observation; cognitive approach – which emphasizes the internal central cognitive processes inserted between stimuli and the behavioural response of the individual. By addressing the main theoretical points, this paper deals with classical theories of aggression and their definition of...
Paradigm change in aggression research: The time has come to retire the General Aggression Model
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2012
As Kuhn (1970) has noted, most scientific fields go through processes of paradigm change, painful periods in which old theories no longer fit available data and are placed by new theories. Such periods typically create strife and debate as ideological differences emerged between proponents of old and new theoretical approaches. In the current paper, we argue that such a period has been reached within the field of aggression research. Over the past half-century, social cognitive and social learning paradigms of aggression, exemplified in the General Aggression Model (GAM) have retained dominance, particularly in areas such as media violence. We contend that data to support the GAM and social cognitive approaches to aggression have never been conclusive, and newer evidence increasingly suggests that the GAM and social cognitive theories of aggression more generally are not adequate to explain aggressive phenomena. We discuss weaknesses and problematic, sometimes hidden assumptions of the GAM and how these reduce the utility of this paradigm. Current evidence suggests that the GAM and the social cognitive paradigm of aggression should be retired, and approaches which focus on diathesis-stress hold greater promise.►Aggression research has entered a period of paradigm change. ►The General Aggression Model has received only poor research support. ►Diathesis stress models of aggression are a better match to research data.
Human Aggression: A Social-Cognitive View
The SAGE Handbook of Social Psychology: Concise Student Edition, 2007
In creating this electronic reprint, we have attempted to keep the style, pagination, and format as close to the published form as possible. Nonetheless, some errors may have occurred. If you discover a substantial error, please contact Craig Anderson
Aggression and Antisocial BehaviorView of Aggression
2012
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Institutional Repository is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.