Turning the Tables on Student Case Analysis Assignments (original) (raw)
2006, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education
to name a few. In fact, argued that the case method is "the most relevant and practical way to learn managerial skills" (p. 1) and further suggested that perhaps the greatest benefit of cases is helping students develop skills associated with learning to ask the right questions. While we strongly agree with this objective, our experience suggests that it is the instructor who asks the vast majority of questions during case discussions, not the students. To address this situation, we have turned the tables on the students in the classroom by taking on the role of analyst ourselves. The purpose of our approach is in line with the overall goal of our school, which is the development of effective managers. To this end, by turning the tables, students are put in the role of manager and decision maker with the responsibility of critiquing a professional presentation. A thorough critique would include a determination of the appropriateness of the tools and techniques used in the analysis; the comprehensiveness of the analysis; and the validity of the results. These are skills and judgments managers face daily. This approach provides an opportunity to accomplish a number of objectives: (1) demonstrate a professional presentation, (2) reinforce the application of tools and techniques, (3) demonstrating that great presentations may hide logical/analytical flaws, and (4) drive home the value of asking the right questions.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Analysis In Teaching With Cases: A Revisit To Blooms Taxonomy Of Learning Objectives
College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 2011
Analysis", the core of graduate business education is probably one of the least understood and most misrepresented learning activities. Everyone seems to claim that they know it, yet most seem unable to actually define it or practice it. This paper reviews Bloom's taxonomy of learning objectives with a special focus on "analysis." More specifically, the paper seeks to present a more profound perspective of "analysis" and "synthesis" as taught and learned in a typical business course that utilizes case studies. The authors take more of an epidemiological perspective to case analysis which goes beyond the mere rehash of case facts to developing an understanding of all the communication elements in the case and the relationship between the elements for the purpose of synthesizing a new picture that was not obvious before. The paper presents a useful framework for analyzing business cases and recommending and implementing viable strategic options.
Student-Generated Cases as a Transformation Tool
Journal of Management Education, 2001
The case method has endured as an effective pedagogical tool in business education for close to a century. Most recently, its use is indicated as a measure of the quality of MBA programs (Tracy & Waldfogel, 1997). In its classic form, students are presented with a written description of some facts and events involved in a particular situation. The student is required to use theoretical concepts to analyze problems and develop recommendations to improve the situation. Discussions in a group setting using the Socratic method of questioning are utilized to guide the case analysis (Lavitt, 1992; Spizizen & Hart, 1985). A major benefit of case analysis is its capacity to heighten the relevance of theoretical material to an unseasoned undergraduate as well as an experienced student. However, the effectiveness of the case analysis may be diminished if a particular case is perceived as irrelevant or uninteresting to the learner. One way to overcome this limitation is to have students write their own cases (Argyris, 1980; Owneby, 1992; Rasmussen, 1984; Schnelle, 1967). The purpose of this article is to present the student-generated case as a learning tool and to describe how it can be used as another form of the classic 516
Student perception of value derived from case analysis assessments
ICBAI, Singapore, July, 2006
This paper examines students' perception of case analysis which made up part of assessable assignments. The results indicate that a large majority of students preferred working on the analysis of the cases given as their assignments because it provided a better opportunity to improve grades, and were easier to relate to because they were relevant to what students may encounter in a work situation. For the instructional perspective the goal was to offer problems that were practical and to minimise opportunity to recast material from internet and other sources. These findings have several implications for the design and development of marketing related subjects at both undergraduate and post-graduate levels where student engagement and active or problem-based learning are important academic goals.
Accounting …, 2004
The use of business case studies has been frequently promoted as a method for developing accounting graduates who are active, interdependent, and independent learners. The debate continues over the best method for using the case study method; should case studies be student-or teacher-led? A recent study ) used Kolb's Learning-Style Inventory (adapted from Honey and Mumford (1986) and Kolb (1984)) to investigate the use of business case studies and student learning styles in an intermediate-level cost and management accounting course. The findings from that study suggest that it is how the case studies are used and the level of student involvement that is of vital importance. This paper extends the findings of Adler et al (2004) by repeating the survey but with the following potentially important changes: prior to the survey, students had completed an entire semester of intermediate-level courses, including two accounting courses, plus the surveys were administered at a later point in the particular management accounting paper.
Case Methodology: Addressing The Questions Of How And Why
1996
The purpose of this paper is to give the reader a better understanding of case methodology used in teaching as opposed to case methodology used in research. Both address the same fundamental issues by asking “how” or “why” questions about a contemporary set of events over which the investigator has little or no control. The case method of research rigorously attempts to answer these questions whereas the case method of teaching attempts to stimulate the students by asking these questions and encouraging the students to ask “how” and “why” questions of their own. By addressing these questions in the case methodology of instruction, education receives two significant benefits. First, students are tasked with applying and honing their critical thinking skills, e.g. defining issues, using sound reasoning, and making decisions. Second, instructors maintain that all important tie with industry through the development and use of cases in the classroom. This paper gives a brief description ...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.