Seed Reproduction Is Associated with a Transient Escape from Parasite Damage in American Beech (original) (raw)

Abstract

sparkles

AI

Seed reproduction in American beech (Fagus grandifolia) provides a transient escape from parasite damage compared to asexual reproduction through vegetative propagation. This study tests the parasite-escape hypothesis and finds that seedlings experience less leaf damage than suckers, with the advantage diminishing over time. Findings indicate support for the hypothesis, suggesting further investigation into underlying mechanisms and implications for other species exhibiting similar reproductive strategies.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (25)

  1. Bell, G. 1985. Two theories of sex and variation. -Experientia 10: 1235-1245.
  2. Bierzychudek, P. 1987. Resolving the paradox of sexual repro- duction: a review of experimental tests. -In: Stearns, S. C. (ed.), The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birk- hauser, Basel, pp. 163-174.
  3. Buss, L. W. 1987. The evolution of individuality. -Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
  4. Caten, C. E. 1974. Intra-racial variation in Phytophthora in- festans and adaptation to field resistance for potato blight. - Ann. Appl. Biol. 77: 259-270.
  5. Crocker, W. 1939. Ageing in plants. -In: Cowdry, E. V. (ed.), Problems of ageing. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 1-31.
  6. Edmunds, G. F.. Jr. and Alstad, D. N. 1981. Responses of black pineleaf scales to host plant variability. -In: Denno, R. F. and Dingle, H. (eds), Insect life history patterns: Habitat and geographic variation. Springer, N.Y., pp. 29-18. . -.
  7. -. Fowells, H. A. 1965. Silvics of forest trees of the United States. -U.
  8. S. Dept. Agric. Forest Service, Washington.
  9. Hamilton. W. D. 1982. Pathogens as causes of genetic diversity in their host populations. -In: Anderson, R. M. and May, R. M. (eds), Population biology of infectious diseases. Springer, Berlin, pp. 269-296.
  10. Held, M. E . 1983. Pattern of beech regeneration in the east- central United States. -Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 110: 55-62.
  11. Hepting, G. H. 1971. Diseases of forest and shade trees of the United States. -U.S. Dept. Agric. Forest Service. Wash- ington.
  12. Jones, R. H. and Raynal, D. J. 1986. Spatial distribution and development of root sprouts in Fagus grandifolia (Faga- ceae). -Am. J. Bot. 73: 1723-1731.
  13. Karban, R. 1989. Fine-scale adaptation of herbivorous thrips to individual host plants. -Nature, Lond. 340: 6Q-61.
  14. Kelley, S. E. 1989. Experimental studies of the evolutionary significance of sexual reproduction. V. A field test of the sib-competition lottery hypothesis. -Evolution 43: 1054- 1065.
  15. -, Antonovics, J. and Schmitt, J. 1988. A test of the short- term advantage of sexual reproduction. -Nature, Lond. 331: 714-716.
  16. Michod, R. E . and Levin, B. R. (eds). 1988. The evolution of sex: an examination of current ideas. -Sinauer. Sunder- land, MA.
  17. Parker, M. A. 1985. Local population differentiation for com- patibility in an annual legume and its host-specific fungal pathogen. -Evolution 39: 713-723.
  18. -1987. Pathogen impact on sexual vs asexual reproductive success in Arisaema triphyllum. -Am. J. Bot. 74: 1758- 1763
  19. Rice, W. R. 1983. Parent-offspring pathogen transmission: a selective agent promoting sexual reproduction. -Am. Nat. 121: 187-203.
  20. Rudolf, P. 0. and Leak, W. B. 1974. Fagus L. Beech. -In: Schopmeyer, C. S. (ed.), Seeds of woody plants in the United States. U.S. Dept. Agric. Forest Service, Washing- ton, pp. 4011105.
  21. Silander, J. A. Jr. 1985. Microevolution in clonal plants. -In: Jackson. J. B. C., Buss, L. W. and Cook. R. E. (eds). Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 107-152.
  22. Wainhouse, D. and Howell, R. S. 1983. Intraspecific variation in beech scale populations and in susceptibility of their host Fagus sylvatica. -Ecol. Ent. 8: 351-359.
  23. Williams, G. C. 1975. Sex and evolution. -Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton. NJ.
  24. References Experimental Studies of the Evolutionary Significance of Sexual Reproduction. V. A Field Test of the Sib-Competition Lottery Hypothesis Steven E. Kelley Evolution, Vol. 43, No. 5. (Aug., 1989), pp. 1054-1065. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0014-3820%28198908%2943%3A5%3C1054%3AESOTES%3E2.0.CO%3B2-P Local Population Differentiation for Compatibility in an Annual Legume and its Host-Specific Fungal Pathogen Matthew A. Parker Evolution, Vol. 39, No. 4. (Jul., 1985), pp. 713-723.
  25. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0014-3820%28198507%2939%3A4%3C713%3ALPDFCI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23 Parent-Offspring Pathogen Transmission: A Selective Agent Promoting Sexual Reproduction William R. Rice The American Naturalist, Vol. 121, No. 2. (Feb., 1983), pp. 187-203. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0147%28198302%29121%3A2%3C187%3APPTASA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X http://www.jstor.org