The importance of the family history in caring for families with long QT syndrome and dilated cardiomyopathy (original) (raw)
Related papers
Inpatient detection of cardiac-inherited disease: the impact of improving family history taking
Open Heart, 2016
Objectives: 'Idiopathic' cardiac conditions such as dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and resuscitated sudden cardiac death (RSCD) may be familial. We suspected that inpatient cardiology services fail to recognise this. Our objective was to compare diagnostic value of family histories recorded by inpatient cardiology teams with a multigenerational family tree obtained by specially trained allied professionals. Methods: 2 experienced cardiology nurses working in 2 tertiary adult cardiac units were trained in cardiacinherited diseases and family history (FHx) taking, and established as regional coordinators for a National Cardiac Inherited Disease Registry. Over 6 months they sought 'idiopathic' cardiology inpatients with conditions with a possible familial basis, reviewed the FHx in the clinical records and pursued a minimum 3-generation family tree for syncope, young sudden death and cardiac disease (full FHx). Results: 37 patients (22 males) were selected: mean age 51 years (range 15-79). Admission presentations included (idiopathic) RSCD (14), dyspnoea or heart failure (11), ventricular tachycardia (2), other (10). 3 patients had already volunteered their familial diagnosis to the admitting team. FHx was incompletely elicited in 17 (46%) and absent in 20 (54%). 29 patients (78%) provided a full FHx to the coordinator; 12 of which (41%) were strongly consistent with a diagnosis of a cardiac-inherited disease (DCM 7, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 3, long QT 1, left ventricular non-compaction 1). Overall, a familial diagnostic rate rose from 3/37(8%) to 12/37 (32%). Conclusions: Adult cardiology inpatient teams are poor at recording FHx and need to be reminded of its powerful diagnostic value.
Penetrance and Risk Profile in Inherited Cardiac Diseases Studied in a Dedicated Screening Clinic
The American Journal of Cardiology, 2009
Genetically transmitted cardiomyopathies can affect several members in a family. Identification of high-risk patients could lead to a preventive treatment. We report the results of a 5-year experience of a dedicated clinic. Family screening was offered to 493 consecutive unrelated patients; 2,328 subjects (40 ؎ 19 years old, 52% men) were evaluated (mean 4.4 relatives/family). Electrocardiography and echocardiography were performed in all cases; additional tests were indicated depending on the disease. Familial study was recommended because of a proband with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) in 57%, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) in 14%, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in 2%, left ventricular noncompaction in 2%, Brugada syndrome (BS) in 15%, long QT syndrome (LQTS) in 3%, and other conditions in 6%. Familial disease was confirmed in 164 (39%); 43% with HC, 47% with IDC, 25% with ARVC, 33% with left ventricular noncompaction, 28% with BS, and 30% with LQTS. Two hundred twenty-two (44 ؎ 20 years old, 60% men) affected relatives were identified (129 of whom were newly diagnosed). Sixtyfour patients were newly diagnosed with HC, 40 with IDC, 2 with ARVC, 5 with left ventricular noncompaction, 14 with BS, and 2 with LQTS, in whom appropriate risk stratification and medication, if needed, were initiated (specific medication in 40, 31.0%). Cardioverter-defibrillator implantation was indicated in 4 relatives for primary prevention. Ninety-two (18.7%) had a family history of sudden death (FHSCD). Consanguinity was rare but significantly associated to a higher percentage of family disease (75.0% vs 38.3%, p ؍ 0.003) and family history of sudden death (42.1% vs 17.8, p <0.001). In conclusion, the prevalence of familial disease in inherited cardiac conditions is high. Systematic familial study identified many asymptomatic affected patients who could benefit from early treatment to prevent complications. Dedicated clinics and multidisciplinary teams are needed for proper screening programs.
Genetics and clinics: together to diagnose cardiomyopathies
European Heart Journal Supplements
The diagnostic paths of hereditary cardiomyopathies (CMPs) include both clinical and molecular genetics. The first step is the clinical diagnosis that guides the decisions about treatments, monitoring, prognostic stratification, and prevention of major events. The type of CMP [hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC)] is defined by the phenotype, and the genetic testing may identify the precise cause. Furthermore, genetic testing provides a pre-clinical diagnosis in unaffected family members and the basis for prenatal diagnosis. It can contribute to risk stratification (e.g. LMNA) and can be a major diagnostic criterion (e.g. ARVC). The test can be limited to a single gene when the pre-test diagnostic hypothesis is based on proven clinical evidence (e.g. GLA for Fabry disease). Alternatively, it can be expanded from a multigene panel to a whole exome or whole genome sequencing when the...
Prospective Familial Assessment in Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, 2006
Background— In autoimmune disorders, circulating autoantibodies identify healthy relatives at risk years before clinical presentation. Healthy relatives of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) who have echocardiographic changes, including left ventricular enlargement or depressed fractional shortening at baseline, have increased medium-term risk for DCM development. Approximately one third of relatives have serum anti-heart autoantibodies (AHAs) at baseline; we intended to assess their potential role in predicting DCM development. Methods and Results— Baseline evaluation, including electrocardiography, echocardiography, and AHA, was performed in 592 asymptomatic relatives of 169 consecutive DCM patients (291 males and 301 females; mean age 36±16 years). Relatives were classified in accordance with published echocardiographic criteria; those who did not have DCM were followed up (median of 58 months). DCM among relatives was diagnosed by echocardiography at follow-up. Of the 59...
Genetic Testing in Inherited Heart Diseases: Practical Considerations for Clinicians
Current Cardiology Reports, 2017
Purpose of Review Genetic testing has become an important element in the care of patients with inherited cardiac conditions (ICCs). The purpose of this review is to provide clinicians with insights into the utility of genetic testing as well as challenges associated with interpreting results. Recent Findings Genetic testing may be indicated for individuals who are affected with or who have family histories of various ICCs. Various testing options are available and determining the most appropriate test for any given clinical scenario is key when interpreting results. Newly published guidelines as well as various publicly accessible tools are available to clinicians to help with interpretation of genetic findings; however the subjectivity with respect to variant classification can make accurate assessment challenging. Summary Genetic information can provide highly useful and relevant information for patients, their family members, and their healthcare providers. Given the potential ramifications of variant misclassification, expertise in both clinical phenotyping and molecular genetics is imperative in order to provide accurate diagnosis, management recommendations, and family risk assessment for this patient population.
Clinical Genetics, 2005
Objectives: In view of the increasing demands for genetic counselling and DNA diagnostics in cardiogenetics, the roles of cardiologists and clinical geneticists in the delivery of care need to be redefined. We investigated the preferences of both groups of professionals with regard to the future allocation of six cardiogenetic responsibilities in counselling and testing, using hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) as a prevalent model disease. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: Dutch cardiologists (n=643) and clinical geneticists (n=60), all members of professional societies. Results: Response rates were 33 and 82%, respectively. In both groups, the majority preferred to perform most of the tasks described above in collaboration. Informing HCM patients about the genetics of HCM and requesting DNA testing in symptomatic patients was viewed by 43 and 35% of cardiologists, respectively, as their sole responsibility, however, and 39 and 59% of clinical geneticists did not object to these views. Both groups felt that the task of discussing the consequences of HCM for offspring and that of discussing the results of DNA diagnostics should be shared or performed by clinical geneticists. Both groups considered coordination of family screening the sole responsibility of clinical geneticists. Opinions on who should request DNA diagnostics in asymptomatic relatives were divided: 86% of clinical geneticists considered it their exclusive responsibility, 10% of cardiologists believed that this task could be performed individually by either group and 30% preferred to collaborate. Most professionals said that they would appreciate education programmes and clinical guidelines. Conclusion: Both cardiologists and clinical geneticists prefer to share rather than divide most cardiogenetic responsibilities in caring for HCM patients. Consequently, capacity problems in both groups are to be expected. To safeguard current professional standards in genetic counselling and testing, deployment of non-medical personnel might be essential.
GENETICS in MEDICINE
Purpose: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is considered a hereditary autosomal dominant condition, but genetic testing is positive in only half of patients. In patients with negative genetic tests, the inheritance pattern and utility of family screening are unclear. Methods: Subjects with HCM were prospectively enrolled in a registry. A survey at a median follow-up of 4 years determined the yield of family screening. Results: The outcome of cardiac screening on 267 family members was reported by 120 survey respondents. Subjects with positive genetic test or family history (n = 74, 62%) reported an HCM diagnosis in 34 of 203 first-degree relatives who were screened (17%). Affected family members were diagnosed at a mean age of 30-39 years, and 22 of 34 experienced HCM-related adverse events (65%). Gene test-negative subjects with no prior family history of HCM (n = 46, 38%) reported an HCM diagnosis in only 2 of 64 first-degree relatives who were screened (3%, po0.001). These two individuals were diagnosed at age > 40 years without HCM-related adverse events. Conclusion: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a heterogeneous disorder, only half of which tracks with a Mendelian inheritance pattern. Negative genetic testing and family history indicates a more complex genetic basis corresponding to low risk for family members.