Power and Silence: Australian Media Portrayal of Israeli and Palestinian Casualties during the Gaza War of 2014 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Palgrave Communications, 2017
This paper employs critical discourse analysis (CDA) to analyse the representation of political social actors in media coverage of the Gaza war of 2008-2009. The paper examines texts of systematically chosen news stories from four international newspapers: 'The Guardian, The Times London, The New York Times and The Washington Post'. The findings show substantial similarities in representation patterns among the four newspapers. More specifically, the selected newspapers foreground Israeli agency in achieving a ceasefire, whereby Israeli actors are predominantly assigned activated roles. By contrast, the four newspapers foreground Palestinian agency in refusing ceasefire through assigning activated roles. The findings of this study suggest that news reports on the Gaza war of 2008-2009 are influenced by the political orientations of the newspapers and also their liberal and conservative ideological stances. Overall, the most represented actors are Israeli governmental officials, whereas Palestinian actors are Hamas members. This representation draws an overall image that the war is being directed against Hamas.
How the Australian media cover humanitarian issues
2003
This article reports on the quantitative analysis of a large-scale study of the coverage of aid and humanitarian issues in the Australian media in 1999. It should be read in conjunction with the qualitative analysis (forthcoming in AJR). The analysis indicates there are large variations in the amount and type of information on these issues available to A ustralian audiences, depending on their geographical location, print/television/radio and public/private media preferences. For some audiences, including private sector outlets in all media outside the Sydney-Canberra-Melbourne media reach, extremely limited information is available on these issues. There are marked differences between mastheads/sections/programs within particular media outlets, and between print/television/radio media. Across all media there is a tendency for saturation coverage ofa small number ofissues, most notably East Timor in the period of our study, and the exclusion of coverage of a broader range of issues, events and regions. Coverage tends to be organised around themes of conflict and violence, to tocus on certain international regions and to ignore or underplay others, to be sourced from international media outlets and to favour spokespeople notfrom the people most directly affected by the issues being reported. How the media cover humanitarian ;001lPO J TI) ? ,(')\ __
The Israeli Media during the Gaza War: Insights from the First Weeks after the Disaster
IntechOpen eBooks, 2024
Since the tragic launch of the Israel-Hamas war (Gaza war) on October 7th, 2023, the role of Israeli media in shaping public discourse and national sentiment has been a subject of intense scrutiny. This article delves into the intricate relationship between media coverage and societal perceptions during the initial weeks following the terrorists' invasion. It explores how Israeli media navigated the complex terrain of war reporting, balancing the duty of factual reporting with national security concerns and the psychological impact on the civilian population. The study highlights the media's efforts to construct a narrative that not only informed the public but also fostered a sense of national unity and resilience. Through a comprehensive analysis of various media outlets, the article sheds light on the dynamics of media coverage in times of crisis, examining the interplay between journalistic practices, government policies, and public sentiment. This inquiry into the Israeli media's coverage of the Gaza war provides valuable insights into the power of the press in shaping public opinion during periods of national upheaval and the ethical challenges inherent in reporting on conflict and terrorism.
Global Humanitarianism and Media Culture, 2019
What happens when humanitarian images of Palestinian casualties take centre stage, as they did during the 2014 Israeli bombardment of Gaza? In this chapter, I argue that a media outcome that appears to be favourable to the Palestinians, in that it focuses on their suffering, can actually have the opposite effect. I refer to a range of media texts related to the Gaza conflicts: UK, US and Israeli news coverage, including UK journalist Jon Snow’s video blog upon his return from Gaza in 2014; Waltz with Bashir, which was released around the time of the 2008–9 conflict; and the Palestinian film Where Should the Birds Fly (Fida Qishta, 2013), which focuses on the 2008–9 conflict and its aftermath. Taking its title from Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's statement during the 2014 conflict - accusing Hamas of using ‘telegenically dead Palestinians’ for their cause - the chapter focuses on the concept of 'perception management'. This can serve to divorce the public from realities of state violence through a kind of cinematic derealisation that enables states to reduce perceptions of blame for their atrocities and act with impunity.
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Gaza Marches of Return Coverage in Selected Newspapers
International Journal of Linguistics
The current study aimed at discovering biases through comparing the used journalistic and lexicalizations practices in quotations patterns and representations of social actors in news coverage of the Gaza Marches of Return. The selected newspapers were The Guardian, the New York Times, The Jordan Times and Haaretz. The study sample comprised 32 news articles and 8 editorials. The findings of the study revealed that more space was given to Israeli political and military actors over their Palestinian counterparts in the New York Times and Haaretz. The Guardian and the Jordan Times quotations of Palestinian civilian actors focused on human suffering and casualties themes while Haaretz and the NYT quoted them instigating deadly attacks among other themes. The use of negative themes along with negative speakers’ descriptions of Palestinian political actors revealed biased stances against Palestinian Civilian Actors. In addition, the used reporting verbs, unbalanced quotations distributio...
APR editor criticises NZ media coverage over Israel's war on Gaza
Café Pacific, 2024
Pacific media commentator and Asia Pacific Report editor David Robie has criticised New Zealand media coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza, describing it as “lopsided” in favour of Tel Aviv. He said New Zealand media was too dependent on American and British news services, which were based in two of the countries most committed to Israel and in denial of the genocide that was happening. New Zealand media were tending to treat the conflict as “just another war” instead of the reality of a “horrendous” series of massacres with a long-lasting impact on Western credibility and commitment to a global rules-based order. Second part of a two-part interview with Earthwise. Broadcast on Plains 96.9 FM radio on 1 April 2024 https://youtu.be/3QG9OGeS4d0
Stories in distress: three case studies in Australian media coverage of humanitarian crises
2004
This article reviews three case studies in the Australian media reporting of international humanitarian crises. The case studies cover a six-month period in 1999 and draw on all media over that period. The three case studies are: the violence in East TImor at the time of the 1999 independence ballot, the imprisonment in Yugoslavia of Prall and Wallace, two employees of CARE Australia, and the floods in Mozambique. While the three case studies collectively exhibit many of the standard characteristics ofmedia coverage ofhumanitarian issues, individually they differ significantly in the scale and orientation ofcoverage. Wesuggest that a significantfactor in these differences was the relationship between the sources for the stories and the journalists, which in turn depended on other factors. We review the adequacy of the Hall and Ericson positions on the source-journalist relationship in explaining these differences, and suggest that a field analysis derivedfrom Bourdieu is helpful in ...
Journalism & Media, 2025
The Hamas surprise attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, and the Israeli military response unleashed a catastrophic episode of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and exacerbated broader tensions in the region. This study compares Al Jazeera English (AJE) and BBC’s coverage of and discourse around key events in the early stages of the 2023 Israel–Gaza War. Using critical discourse analysis as an analytical framework, this study employs mixed methods to compare transitivity, intertextuality, and lexicalization as key discursive features in the two outlets’ coverage of the war. Counter to previous qualitative works, this study quantitatively reveals no variation between AJE and BBC’s use of active voice yet points to key qualitative differences in the discursive treatment of Palestinians and the reporting on death tolls. It further demonstrates drastic differences in the quoting patterns and negative lexicalization of the early phases of the war, with AJE taking a more balanced approach and BBC refraining from emphasizing accusations against Israel of committing “genocide”, “ethnic cleansing”, “terrorism”, and “war crimes”. The study concludes with a discussion of the implications of differential discourses around the Gaza War and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in international media.