Income-related health disparity and its determinants in New York state: racial/ethnic and geographical comparisons (original) (raw)
Related papers
Health Inequality and Its Determinants in New York
2006
Self-assessed health status conditioned by several objective measures of health and socio-demographic characteristics are used to measure health inequality. We compare the quality of health and health inequality among different racial/ethnic groups as well as across 10 economic development regions in New York State. In terms of average health and health inequality, American Indian/Alaskan Natives and Hispanics are found to
The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Health Disparities
arXiv (Cornell University), 2022
and shared first authorship Note that the quality of this paper is limited by the lack of a complete high school education of all authors. High-quality healthcare in the US can be cost-prohibitive for certain socioeconomic groups. In this paper, we examined data from the US Census and the CDC to determine the degree to which specific socioeconomic factors correlate with both specific and general health metrics. We employed visual analysis to find broad trends and predictive modeling to identify more complex relationships between variables. Our results indicate that certain socioeconomic factors, like income and educational attainment, are highly correlated with aggregate measures of health.
Health inequalities by class and race in the US: What can we learn from the patterns?
Social Science & Medicine, 2012
Social determinants of health Health determinants USA health disparities USA health inequality Class Race A classless society? Throughout most of the world, the term "health inequalities" generally refers to differences in health by social class, unless specified otherwise. In the United States, however, the most comparable term, "health disparities", has generally referred to differences in health by race or ethnic group. Historically, public health data in the U.S. have been reported by race and far less frequently by class, reflecting a deeply-rooted belief that we have an essentially classless society. That notion may seem preposterous to anyone familiar with the wide and widening economic inequalities within the US. Nevertheless, the belief that this is a classless society is pervasive. It reflects long-and deeply-held beliefs in the U.S. as "the land of opportunity," where hard work and ability almost always pay off, and, conversely, those who are unsuccessful must not have worked hard or been smart enough. Inadequate consideration of socioeconomic factors is a massive obstacle to understanding the role of non-medical influences on health. Also, it reinforces scientifically unfounded assumptions about the role of genetic differences in racial or ethnic disparities in health, a convenient justification for accepting racial disparities in health, wealth, and well-being as inevitable. The patterning of health by race/ethnicity and class in the U.S Large and persistent racial or ethnic disparities in health in the U.S. have repeatedly been documented, with Blacks and American Indians generally having the worst, and Whites generally the best health; Latinos (particularly some subgroups) and some Asian subgroups also have worse health on some measures (The Office of Minority Health, 2010). Although less information on socioeconomic inequalities in health has been available routinely in the U.S. than in many other affluent countries, recent data have demonstrated that, as in Europe, health inequalities by class in the U.S. more often than not follow stepwise gradient patterns, with health improving incrementally with higher income or educational levels (the standard socioeconomic measures in the U.S.) (Braveman, Cubbin, Egerter, Williams, & Pamuk, 2010; Minkler, Fuller-Thomson, & Guralnik, 2006). Gradients are seen both overall and within racial or ethnic groups e often among non-Latino Whites and Blacks (hereafter: Whites and Blacks), and less consistently among Latinos. Striking gradients in self-rated adult health according to educational attainment have been observed within Blacks, Latinos, American Indians/Alaskan Natives, Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders, other Asians, and Whites, examining each racial/ethnic group separately (Braveman et al., 2010). The incremental socioeconomic gradients within multiple different racial/ethnic groups make it clear that socioeconomic inequalities cannot be reduced to racial/ethnic differences, although conflating class with race still
Impact of Income Inequality on the Nation's Health
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2016
Income inequality in the United States has been increasing in recent decades. It is unclear whether income inequality has an independent effect on health outcomes, or whether it simply correlates with increasing levels of poverty. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether income inequality is significantly associated with US county healthcare expenditures and healthcare utilization. Cross-sectional analysis of county health expenditure data from the Health Resources and Services Administration's Area Resources File, county income inequality measures (Gini coefficient) from the Census' American Community Survey, and estimates of potentially preventable admissions and potentially discretionary procedures from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998-2011). Datasets were linked via county Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) codes. Multivariable linear and Poisson regression analyses were performed at the county level adjusting for county characteristics. 1,237 coun...
Racial/Ethnic Health Disparity in the U.S.: A Decomposition Analysis
Econometrics, 2021
Following recent econometric developments, we use self-assessed general health on a Likert scale conditioned by several objective determinants to measure health disparity between non-Hispanic Whites and minority groups in the United States. A statistical decomposition analysis is conducted to determine the contributions of socio-demographic and neighborhood characteristics in generating disparities. Whereas, 72% of health disparity between Whites and Blacks is attributable to Blacks’ relatively worse socio-economic and demographic characteristics, it is only 50% for Hispanics and 65% for American Indian Alaska Natives. The role of a number of factors including per capita income and income inequality vary across the groups. Interestingly, “blackness” of a county is associated with better health for all minority groups, but it affects Whites negatively. Our findings suggest that public health initiatives to eliminate health disparity should be targeted differently for different racial...
Health Affairs, 2011
Health disparities by racial or ethnic group or by income or education are only partly explained by disparities in medical care. Inadequate education and living conditions-ranging from low income to the unhealthy characteristics of neighborhoods and communities-can harm health through complex pathways. Meaningful progress in narrowing health disparities is unlikely without addressing these root causes. Policies on education, child care, jobs, community and economic revitalization, housing, transportation, and land use bear on these root causes and have implications for health and medical spending. A shortsighted political focus on reducing spending in these areas could actually increase medical costs by magnifying disease burden and widening health disparities.
Understanding Racial Disparities in Health: The Income-Wealth Paradox
2000
We examine the ways in which racial differences in health vary over the income-wealth distribution, comparing the self-reported health status of non-Hispanic whites with those of individuals of other races and ethnicities. Paradoxically, we find that although the largest unadjusted racial differences in health are between poor whites and poor nonwhites, after adjusting for income, wealth, and other demographic characteristics, health differences between nonwhites and whites are only significant among those in the upper half of the income-wealth distribution. The results suggest that unexplained racial differences in reported health status increase with socioeconomic status among individuals aged 25-54.
Persistent Inequalities in Health and Access to Health Services: Evidence From New York City
World Medical & Health Policy
In Manhattan, the rate of hospital discharges for avoidable hospital conditions (AHC), a measure of access to timely and effective ambulatory care, fell by nearly 50 percent between 1999 and 2013. Despite this remarkable improvement, there has been virtually no change in racial, ethnic, or neighborhood-level differences in rates of AHC. This is surprising given New York City's emphasis on public health and its efforts to reduce health and health-care inequalities. We discuss the policy implications of these findings and argue that growing income and wealth inequalities have limited the ability of New York City to address inequalities in population health and health-care access. Unless there are substantial changes in federal and state policy, designed to reduce economic inequalities, it will be difficult to achieve the goal of eliminating health and health-care inequalities.