PRESENT, PAST AND FUTURE OF THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI CONFLICT: A CHALLENGE TO THE UNITED NATIONS' COLLECTIVE SECURITY SYSTEM (PONTE JOURNAL, AP. 2016, English). (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Israeli Response to Jewish Extremism and Violence
2002
Until recently, the study of conflict and conflict resolution remained comparatively immune to broad developments in social and political theory. When the changing nature and locus of large-scale conflict in the post-Cold War era is also taken into account, the case for a reconsideration of the fundamentals of conflict analysis and conflict resolution becomes all the more stark. New Approaches to Conflict Analysis promotes the development of new theoretical insights and their application to concrete cases of large-scale conflict, broadly defined. The series intends not to ignore established approaches to conflict analysis and conflict resolution, but to contribute to the reconstruction of the field through a dialogue between orthodoxy and its contemporary critics. Equally, the series reflects the contemporary porosity of intellectual borderlines rather than simply perpetuating rigid boundaries around the study of conflict and peace. New Approaches to Conflict Analysis seeks to uphold the normative commitment of the field's founders yet also recognises that the moral impulse to research is properly part of its subject matter. To these ends, the series is comprised of the highest quality work of scholars drawn from throughout the international academic community, and from a wide range of disciplines within the social sciences. published M. Anne Brown Human rights and the borders of suffering: the promotion of human rights in international politics Karin Fierke Changing games, changing strategies: critical investigations in security Tami Amanda Jacoby and Brent Sasley (eds) Redefining security in the Middle East Deiniol Jones Cosmopolitan mediation? Conflict resolution and the Oslo Accords
Contending Approaches to Security in Israel: 1948-2000, MSc Thesis, METU
This thesis provides an analysis of Israel’s security conceptions, discourses and practices, in the context of the Arab–Israeli conflict in general and the Israeli– Palestinian conflict in particular, between 1948 and 2000. The purpose of the study is, to explore those processes through which particular definitions and practices of security have been produced and changed, against the background of the domestic debates and competing worldviews among key political actors; and to highlight the overall impact of these points in different periods on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and, thus, on Israel’s overall security. In this context, it is observed that the debates among the political actors, regarding the future borders and the identity of the state, have played a key role in the construction and reconstruction of Israeli security policy particularly vis-à-vis the Palestinian problem. Nevertheless, it is also observed that the extent of these differences has been limited to the objectives of the security policy, and that a zero- sum conception of security, and the primacy of military means to confront the perceived threats have prevailed as common characteristics of Israeli security understanding, informing Israel’s related practices. Along these lines the thesis considers the Oslo peace process as an anomaly, and tries to assess it within the framework of the continuities and changes it has introduced to thinking and acting about security in Israel.
Oyemade bolaji , 2022
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict traces its roots to the late 19th century, predating the establishment of Israel in 1948. This study explores the historical background, examining the escalating tensions between Palestinian Arabs and Jewish immigrants. The declaration of Israel's independence in 1948 and subsequent Arab-Israeli wars have created a longstanding territorial dilemma, leading to a multitude of United Nations (UN) resolutions aimed at resolving the conflict. Despite these resolutions, the conflict persists, prompting a critical examination of the reasons behind the UN's inability to achieve a resolution. This research seeks to address the following questions: What are the origins, causes, courses, and consequences of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? What role does the United Nations play in this conflict, and how effective are its resolutions? Additionally, it explores the roles of superpowers in the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts and the overall view of the international community regarding resolutions.
The Israel-Palestinian Conundrum: Cutting the Gordian Knot
The paper discusses why either of the two purposed solutions to the Israel-Palestinian problem could not work because of the cross-purposes of four powerful stakeholders in the conflict. The paper suggests a solution which meets the basic goals of each of the four stakeholders while at the same time addresses their deep-seated fears. The solution envisions a phased development in the process of integrating the two societies, suggesting trust building mechanisms that include institutional innovations and cross-cultural community interactions.
The Middle East region can be described as a one where conflicts often arise. The conflict between Israel and Palestine that commenced in 1947 is also such a conflict. The conflict between these two States has erupted in violent forms from time to time till year 2024. The United Nations Organization, which was established to world peace and protection, has intervened to resolve this issue but has so far failed to enforce a permanent solution. The research question studied the lack of strong intervention by the United Nations in resolving the conflict between Israel and Palestine, despite its role as the primary global organization for international peace and protection. The main objective of this research is to study the actions taken by the United Nations Organization in order to resolve the conflict between Israel and Palestine. This research utilized secondary data sources for qualitative analysis. To date, the United Nations Organization has failed to find and implement a permanent solution to the conflict based on the agreement of both parties. The factors influencing this are as follows: Israel has the support of Western countries. Since Israel is a member state of the United Nations Organization, it is not possible to resolve the conflict through a non-partisan approach. Additionally, the proposals brought forth to resolve the conflict are not of a practical level, which is unacceptable to both states. The powerful central States that dominate the world authority and the United Nations Organization are directly responsible for such dangerous wars between Israel and Palestine. It has become generalized for them to foster such conflicts in the world for their own political goals and agendas.
Xavier Pons Rafols, 2024
The purpose of this essay/editorial - closed on 8 January 2024 - is to formulate as fully as possible, although necessarily provisional, an approach from the perspective of International Law to the war in Gaza that began a little over three months ago, and more generally to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that has lasted at least seventy-five years, with the creation of the state of Israel, the first Arab-Israeli war and the Nakba to which the Palestinian people have been condemned. In other words, this is a brief international legal approach to a moment of crisis and intensification of a historic conflict that, in these months, has been a real turning point in the endless cycle of violence that has plagued the region for decades. To this end, this essay addresses various issues of international legal relevance in relation to the current war in Gaza, such as the conceptualisation of international terrorism; the justification of legitimate self-defence used by Israel and, in particular, the conditions required by International Law for its exercise; as well as the possible commission of serious crimes of international concern - war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide -, the applicability of International Humanitarian Law and the call for individual criminal responsibility in this context. This essay also analyses the response of the international community organized in the United Nations to the current war in Gaza, highlighting the insufficient action of the Security Council during these months of acute crisis, the majority reaction of the General Assembly calling for a cessation of hostilities, and the repeated and futile humanitarian appeals made by its Secretary-General. In order to place the current crisis in the perspective of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, there are also briefly discussed the historical and political context, in particular the results of the occupation of territories in the Six-Day War of 1967, the consistent position of the General Assembly on the Palestinian question, the United Nations action on human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, as well as the Security Council’s action on these Territories and the proposed peace initiatives, in particular with regard to the two-State solution. The essay concludes with concluding remarks and an epilogue where, in view of the current humanitarian catastrophe and the protracted nature of the conflict, calling for an immediate cessation of hostilities and the release of hostages, and for the current phase of the conflict to become a genuine turning point that can be grasped as an opportunity for peace in the region.
The Political and Legal Underpinnings of the Palestine-Israel Conflict
New Politics, 2023
This paper starts with the historical background to the Hamas attacks of 7 October 2023 on Israel and the Israeli response of bombing the Gaza Strip while blocking all food, water, medicines and fuel from reaching its population of 2.3 million people. It attempts to explain the responses of world leaders, which in the case of Western countries contrast sharply with the responses of their people, especially on the issue of a ceasefire. It ends by looking at ways of supporting the human and democratic rights of Palestinians while also combating antisemitism, a task made easier by the pivotal role played by Jewish scholars and activists in the struggle for truth and justice in Palestine.
United State of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. A Synoptic Problem
An attempt to point at the "synoptic perspective" from which the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict appears not as ruptured reality, but as a unified situation. The basic claim is the this united state of the conflict is the politics of the modern secular nation-state. The paper then goes on to claim that the synoptic perspective of the conflict as inter-religious conflict, is accordingly the nation-state-religion.