Un-educating creativity: a case for a greater emphasis on creativity in medical education (original) (raw)
Related papers
Creativity as an Essential Aspect in Medical Education
Creativity Studies, 2022
The article deals with the issues of developing students’ creative skills at medical educational institutions. Intensification of students’ creative potential occurs through the formation of thinking, research and communication skills, ability to interact with information means and technologies. Second-year students of General Medicine Faculty were involved in the experiment at Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University in Ukraine. Experimental and control groups included 172 students in each one. We singled out two groups: a control group – training based on the available basic course “Professional English in Medicine” and an experimental group – training based on a combination of two courses: the basic course “Professional English in Medicine” and the elective course “Special Medical Terminology”. Homogeneity of the control and experimental groups was checked using Student’s t-test. Testing 0-hypothesis showed no significant differences between samples for the reliability le...
Creativity and Scientific Thinking
Recent international research has thematized the relationship between creative and scientific thinking, according to two perspectives which will be illustrated here. Reported below for the purpose of the CREANET Research are those aspects which seem most relevant in supporting education of creativity in childhood.
Challenges in Creativity & Psychology for the XXI Century, 2019
Setting out from the characterization of creativity in science as the development of novel and effective behaviors that satisfy the criteria of fluidity, originality, flexibility, and elaboration, we propose the Training Strategy to Elaborate Novel and Effective Research Questions (EEEPINE) designed with the objective of fomenting creative behavior in new researchers. This strategy has demonstrated its usefulness (it has been effective for training students at different academic levels—undergraduate, master’s, doctorate—to elaborate and justify new research questions) and versatility (having been used successfully with both individual students and groups of students simultaneously). Also, it has made it possible to foment the elaboration and justification of novel, effective research questions in different disciplinary areas. Keywords: creativity in science, training new researchers, elaborating novel and effective research questions
CREATIVE THINKING AND SKILLS FOR SCIENTIFIC WORK IN UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE STUDENTS IN MEDICINE
Scientific studies and their publication are precursors to future prosperity in medicine. They are an integral part of the professional life of specialists working in a university. Creating an own scientific publication of any kind is often underestimated, and not enough activity, not necessarily preferred, and the path to the final publication can be monotonous and extensive. The main goal of higher education is to prepare students for life in the real world and in the principles of creating scientific work as an important factor for better science. During their studies, they must learn how to properly work with scientific literature and create their own scientific work. The project developed and described here is related to the methodology of scientific research in medicine and healthcare as well as to the development of critical creative thinking in the field of science. It aims is to undergraduate and graduate students in medicine, in order to bring out the highlights of the best scientific work in accordance with modern requirements. As a result, are systematically summarized modern good practices for creating and publishing scientific information, a program of a discipline on scientific writing, related to the methodology of the research work is being developed. This leads to an increase in the quality of scientific work according to the new technologies and requirements of ISO 9001: 2000.
DEVELOPING CREATIVITY IN SCIENCE.docx
The problem for developing creativity in the science, education and business, especially on the working place is derived from the specific modern social and cultural situation. Nowadays in the business, more than ever is important to look for the social creativity of the personality at all levels. In the last decade, the need of creative people is wanted more than ever. In this regard, the goal of our study is forming the structure of: standard of scientific creativity, model for the development of the educational creativity; model for development of creativity at the working place as total professional creativity, as well as approbation of its products in at least one professional area, as education. Creativity and scientific creativity have been discussed as well as skills needed for the creative scientist. The difference between creativity and scientific creativity has been addressed too in the first part of the paper. The literature review and analysis of several definitions of the scientific creativity support the development of a standard for its development through knowledge and skills. The most important skills for the creative scientific activity are presented in the paper. The standard, on one side, helps the scientist, who lectures students, pupils and adults in the development of creative scientific competence. On the other side, the standard is an instrument in appraising the level of self-development of the scientist, who might be a young one, beginner or mature scientist. The model of the functioning teacher (according to the standard of the profession) and the creative teacher has been presented in the paper. We have added characteristics of the creative type of education. In this regard, experimental study was conducted. During the experimental study, the following goal has been defined: to probe the model for development of professional creativity on the working place with teachers in two seminars on the topic „Developing creativity in the effective school. The practical seminars took place in April, May 2016 with 26 teachers from Dobrich city and 29 teachers from Varna city (total number 55 of the respondents). The following working hypothesis has been defined: if creative technology has been used during the practical seminars for teachers, then their results are expected to have characteristics of a creative educational product. To prove the hypothesis, six creative tasks have been given to participants. The need of creativity has been shown in the recent study on one side. On the other side, it shows that is possible to create parameters of standards for creativity at least in three different areas- science, education and business. The development of total professional creativity has been addressed too. It will be adapted based on the selected professional area. Results of applying models to the development of educative creativity on the working place of teacher are very encouraging. The preparation of creative human resources depends on the creativity of teachers and the way they manage the creativity on the working place. The relationship between creative educational product and creative productivity has been also proved.The study will benefit if results from transition of teachers to scientist are shared. In this regard, from 55 teachers, participants in the practical seminars in the two seminars, 17 publish their experience in the manual „Lessons in creativity―. The perspectives from the study are connected with standartizing of scientific creativity, proving that the creative education model is working, as well as developing model for the total professional creativity partly tested with teachers can be tested, added with characteristics and elements from every professional activity.
Scientific Creativity: Philosophical Aspect
European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal of Medical Education
Background: Universities are among the most influential educational environments for teaching creative thinking. The current study aimed to investigate the creativity of postgraduate students at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This applied research studied 265 students in 10 majors in 2018. The participants were selected via two-stage random cluster sampling. Abedi's creativity test was used to collect the data. Content validity was confirmed by the Lawshe method, and the reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient and ICC. Data were analyzed by SPSS using descriptive statistics, t-test, Mann-Whitney, ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Based on the findings, most students (88.6%) obtained a moderate score, in general, and separate by dimensions. Only did 9.7% reach a high score. The highest score was for the fluency dimension (25.3%), followed by originality (24.3%). According to demographic variables separated by age, marital st...
Learning scientific creativity from the arts
Palgrave Communications, 2019
Examining scientific creativity through the lens of artistic practice may allow identification of a path towards an institutional environment that explicitly values and promotes transformative creativity in science. It is our perception as an artist and natural scientist that even though creativity is valued in the sciences, it is not institutionally promoted to the same extent it is in the arts. Acknowledging creativity as acts of transformation and central to scientific pursuit, actively utilizing chance and failure in scientific experimentation, are critical for step changes in scientific knowledge. Iterative and open-ended processes should be modeled after insights from a range of practices in the visual, performing and media arts. Successful institutional implementation requires training through a long-term process of unlearning and learning, organizing interactions to critique results, designing experiments to contain trial and error, and building common and individual spaces ...
Preface: Special Issue on Creativity Rethinks Science
Journal of New Music Research, 2012
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.