Treatment of Pertrochanteric Fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2): Long Versus Short Cephalomedullary Nailing (original) (raw)
Related papers
Treatment of Pertrochanteric Fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2)
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2013
Objectives: To retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes in patients with pertrochanteric femur fractures without subtrochanteric extension (OTA 31-A1 and A2) after treatment with short or long cephalomedullary nails.
Singapore medical journal, 2016
Pertrochanteric fractures after low energy trauma are common among osteoporotic patients. Although the use of intramedullary devices to treat such fractures is becoming increasingly popular, there is a paucity of data comparing the outcomes of the use of short cephalomedullary nails (SCN) and the use of long cephalomedullary nails (LCN). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures who were treated using LCN with the outcomes of those who were treated using SCN. A retrospective review of 64 patients with osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures who were treated with either LCN or SCN and had a minimum follow-up of one year was performed. Primary outcome measures include complications, revision surgeries and union rates. Secondary outcome measures include duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and ambulatory and mortality status at one year. There was no significant difference in clinical and functional outcomes of...
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Introduction Pertrochanteric fractures (PFs) frequently affect the lower limb of osteoporotic patients and represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we have compared functional and radiological results and complications of patients affected by PFs treated with two intramedullary proximal femoral nails. Materials We enrolled 323 subjects with PFs, classified according to AO/OTA system as 31.A1 (pertrochanteric simple) and 31.A2 (pertrochanteric multifragmentary). Patients were divided into two groups according to the osteosynthesis devices: group A, Elos-Intrauma® nail (155 cases) and group B, Gamma 3-Stryker® nail (168 cases). Pre-operatively, the baseline characteristics of each patient (gender, age, weight and BMI) were collected. Intraoperative blood loss, subjective pain by visual analogue scale (VAS), esthetic satisfaction, functional scores of the hip by Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario a...
Pertrochanteric Fractures: Is There an Advantage to an Intramedullary Nail?
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2002
Objectives: To compare the results between a sliding compression hip screw and an intramedullary nail in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. Design: Prospective computer-generated randomization of 206 patients into two study groups: those treated by sliding compression hip screw (Group 1; n ס 106) and those treated by intramedullary nailing (Group 2; n ס 100). Setting: University Level I trauma center. Patients: All patients over the age of fifty-five years presenting with fractures of the trochanteric region caused by a lowenergy injury, classified as AO/OTA Type 31-A1 and A2. Intervention: Treatment with a sliding compression hip screw (Dynamic Hip Screw; Synthes-Stratec, Oberdorf, Switzerland) or an intramedullary nail (Proximal Femoral Nail; Synthes-Stratec, Oberdorf, Switzerland). Main Outcome Measurements: Intraoperative: operative and fluoroscopy times, the difficulty of the operation, intraoperative complications, and blood loss. Radiologic: fracture healing and failure of fixation. Clinical: pain, social functioning score, and mobility score. Results: The minimum follow-up was one year. We did not find any statistically significant difference, intraoperatively, radiologically, or clinically, between the two groups of patients. Conclusions: There is no advantage to an intramedullary nail versus a sliding compression hip screw for low-energy pertrochanteric fractures AO/OTA 31-A1 and A2, specifically with its increased cost and lack of evidence to show decreased complications or improved patient outcome.
Injury, 2016
We investigated whether a proximal femoral nail can be implanted without a distal locking screw in AO/ OTA 31-A1 and 31-A2 pertrochanteric stable femur fractures. A multicentre, randomised study was conducted in six level-two trauma centres in our area (Puglia, Italy). A total of 333 patients received their allocated intervention (162 in the locking group [LG] and 171 in the unlocking group [UG]) and 266 patients were included in the final analysis at 1 year. Our data showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 1-year follow-up for ability to walk, SF-36 questionnaire results, residual pain (visual analogue scale [VAS] score) and level of overall satisfaction. There were also no statistically significant differences between groups for mortality and length of hospital stay. Conversely, the UG was associated with shorter operation and fluoroscopy times, shorter surgical incision length, and less blood loss and residual thigh pain. Pertrochanteric stable fractures (31-A1, 31-A2) can be treated successfully with intramedullary nails without distal locking, reducing patient and clinical personnel radiation exposure and sanitary costs (surgery time and screws costs).
2021
Background and aim: Lateral fractures of proximal femur are the most frequent to treat for the traumatologist surgeon. Intramedullary nailing is the gold standard treatment of this type of fracture. The aim of the study is to analyze the results obtained with the Elos Intrauma nail by the experience of two Departments of Orthopedics and Traumatology (“Guglielmo da Saliceto” Hospital in Piacenza and the Maggiore hospital in Bologna). Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 400 patients with lateral femoral neck fracture surgically treated with Elos Intrauma standard nail. The examined period is from 1st Jannuary 2018 to 31st Dicember 2020. In all patients we implanted Elos® - Intrauma nail, a titanium cervical diaphyseal nail, according to the standard technique. Results: We evaluate at a minumum of three months of follow up 286/400 patients. Average follow up was 3.94 months, minimum 3 months and maximum 24 months. We obtain the 96.85 % of fracture healing, recording 3...
SICOT-J, 2018
Purpose: To compare short with long intramedullary hip nailing for elderly patients with unstable pertrochanteric fractures. Methods: We prospectively studied 50 patients (33 women, 17 men; mean age, 80 years; range, 74–93 years) with unstable pertrochanteric fractures admitted and treated with a short (group A) or a long (group B) intramedullary hip nail from January 2013 to 2017. The patients were randomly allocated into each group according to their order of admission. The mean follow-up was 2 years (range, 1–5 years). We evaluated operative time, function, fracture healing, varus/valgus loss of reduction, and distance between the distal line of the fracture and the distal locking screw of the nail. Results: Operative time was significantly shorter in group A. Function, fracture healing and varus/valgus loss of reduction was similar between the two groups. The mean distance between the distal fracture line and distal locking screw was 7.2 cm (range, 3–10 cm) in patients of group ...
Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters?
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020
Introduction and objectives New generation cephalomedullary nails are, currently, widely used for the treatment of trochanteric proximal femoral fractures. This study aims to compare the midterm outcomes and complication rates in patients with unstable 31A2 fractures treated with two different lengths of nails. Materials and methods Retrospective study including 123 pertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures 31A2 treated with Gamma3 nail ® between January/2017 and January/2019. 19 patients were excluded, resulting in a total of 104 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Two groups, Long Dynamic Gamma3 Nail (LGN) and Short Static Gamma3 Nail (SGN), with 52 patients each were compared. Mean age was 81 years (range 50-99), being 78% female. Preoperative variables included: age, medical comorbidities, mobility, anesthetic risk, associated fractures, hemoglobin and hematocrit values. Postoperatively, functional and radiological results, quality of life, hemoglobin and hematocrit concentration, transfusion requirements, mobility, and pain were evaluated. Additionally, perioperative complications were also analyzed, such as malunion, non-union, infection rates, cutouts , and peri-implant fractures. Results A correct radiological fracture reduction was obtained in 73% of the cases (73% SGN/74% LGN). Two patients in LGN group had intraoperative complications (greater trochanter fractures). 38% of the patients with LGN presented nail tip impaction upon the distal anterior femoral cortex, associated with anterior knee pain. Blood loss and operative time was statistically different between groups. Despite the previous, no differences in clinical outcomes and quality of life were found. Conclusions The present study comparing two lengths of the Gamma3 Nail in 31A2 fractures showed no overall differences in clinical and radiological outcomes, and complication rates. However, the use of LGN was associated with a statistically significant higher blood loss and operative time, and a tendency for increased need for transfusion, and anterior knee pain and reoperation rate. Therefore, we recommend the use of locked SGN in the treatment of 31A2 fractures.
Role of gamma nail in management of pertrochanteric fractures of femur
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2008
Background: Pertrochanteric fractures which involve trochanteric fractures with varying fracture geometry pose a signifi cant challenge to the treating orthopedic surgeon. The aim of this study is to evaluate the management of pertrochanteric fractures of the femur using gamma nail [Asia pacifi c (AP)]. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients of pertrochanteric fractures were treated by closed reduction internal fi xation by gamma nail from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2000. Four patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 56 patients were followed for a mean period of 3.2 years (range 2-4 years).The results were evaluated by assessing the patients regarding their clinical and functional outcome at follow-up as per Kyle's criteria. Results: Peroperative jamming of nail (n = 1), failed distal locking (n = 1), superior cut out of lag screw (n = 1) and postoperative varus malreduction (n = 1) were the complications observed. End results were excellent in 46.34%, good in 36.58%, fair in 14.64%, poor in 2.43%. Conclusion: Gamma nail in expert hands is a suitable implant for management of pertrochanteric fractures of the femur.
Intramedullary nail in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients
Acta chirurgica Iugoslavica, 2015
Introduction. Intramedullary nail is an important component of modern treatment of pertrochanteric femur fractures. Objective. In elderly population, pertrochanteric fractures treated with unreamed intramedullary nails cause less deep infections when compared to reamed intramedullary nails. Patients and Methods. From April, 2010 to May, 2012 at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gaetano Rummo Hospital (Benevento, Italy), 156 patients with pertrochanteric fracture, average age 82.7 years (75-102 years), were treated. In the analyzed case, there were 90 females and 66 males with pertrochanteric fractures. The respondents were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 78 respondents who were treated with reamed intramedullary nails and the second group of 78 respondents treated with unreamed intramedullary nails. Discussion. Infections are not the most common postoperative complications. The risk of infection is increased in patients with comorbidity and in cas...