A Comparative Approach to Teaching Philosophy (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Assumptions of Cross-Cultural Philosophy: What Makes It Possible to Learn from Other Traditions
In “Global Knowledge Frameworks and the Tasks of Cross-Cultural Philosophy,” Leigh Jenco searches for the conception of knowledge that best justifies the judgment that one can learn from non-local traditions of philosophy. Jenco considers four conceptions of knowledge, namely, in catchwords, the esoteric, Enlightenment, hermeneutic, and self- transformative conceptions of knowledge, and she defends the latter as more plausible than the former three. In this critical discussion of Jenco’s article, I provide reason to doubt the self-transformative conception, and also advance a fifth, pluralist conception of knowledge that I contend best explains the prospect of learning from traditions other than one’s own.
2016
Tackling the question of how to recalibrate the relationship between history and theory in our favour without falling into the trap of either an unqualified universalism or a naïve historicism, this article proposes that we move from the position of being a critic of Western theory to that of being a composer and assembler of a new theory from different sources and different histories. The term “theory” brings to mind names such as Plato, Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, Georg Hegel, or Karl Marx. Thus theory appears as a ready-made body of philosophical thought, produced in the West, which either fascinates us (as something “they” do) or makes us turn away (because we think our concerns are social scientifi c rather than philosophical). The more theory-inclined among us simply pick the latest theory off-the-shelf and “apply” it to our context, notwithstan ding its provincial European origin, for we believe that “theory” is by defi nition universal. In other words, our relationship to theo...
Comparative Philosophy and Cultural Patterns (Dao 2016)
As a genus of philosophy, comparative philosophy serves various important purposes. It helps people understand various philosophies and it helps philosophers develop new ideas and solve problems. In this essay, I first clarify the meaning of “comparative philosophy” and its main purposes, arguing that an important purpose of comparative philosophy is to help us understand cultural patterns. This function makes comparative philosophy even more significant in today’s globalized world.
Can Culture Condition the Apprehension of First Principles?
In this paper I have two main goals. First, I attempt to show how those two themes together suggest the claim that culture can condition inquiry into, and apprehension of, first principles. In summary, my claim will be this: Human knowledge, both perceptual and philosophical, is classificatory and depends upon the distinct intellectual power that grasps the universal content in particulars. Our attention is often directed, and thus the exercising of that power is conditioned, by culturally established classification schemes. Second, I also argue that the claim that classification schemes condition apprehension of first principles is a claim that can be used to generate a MacIntyrian style argument against modern conceptions of philosophical inquiry into first principles. My argument in a nutshell is as follows. A modernist must reject the Aristotelian conception of inquiry, which holds that we cannot but employ already established conceptual schemes in order to grasp first principles, which are discoverable only within particular acts of inquiry. But while the modernist explicitly denies the claim that such schemes are required, he or she also tacitly affirms that same claim by rejecting the Aristotelian view of inquiry over its own idealized conceptions.