The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences in its 18th Year: a look at the journal's growth (original) (raw)
Related papers
Publication productivity and citation analysis of the Medical Journal of Malaysia: 2004 - 2008
The Medical journal of Malaysia
We analysed 580 articles (original articles only) published in Medical Journal of Malaysia between 2004 and 2008, the resources referenced by the articles and the citations and impact received. Our aim was to examine article and author productivity, the age of references used and impact of the journal. Publication data was obtained from MyAIS database and Google Scholar provided the citation data. From the 580 articles analyzed, contributors mainly come from the hospitals, universities and clinics. Contributions from foreign authors are low. The useful lives of references cited were between 3 to 11 years. ISI derived Impact factor for MJM ranged between 0.378 to 0.616. Journal self-citation is low. Out of the 580 sampled articles, 76.8% have been cited at least once over the 5 years and the ratio of total publications to citations is 1: 2.6.
Publications
Background: The publication rates of abstracts after they were presented at the National Conference for Clinical Research (NCCR), a scientific conference held in Malaysia, was determined to gauge the scientific value of the conference, whilst providing comparative information with other scientific conferences. Methods: All the abstracts that were presented at the NCCR from 2014 to 2016 were analysed. Keywords from the abstract title, along with the first, second, and last author’s name, were searched via PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus to determine publication status. Results: A total of 320 abstracts were analysed. Of those, 57 abstracts (17.8%) were published. Almost 70% of published abstracts appeared in open access journals that charge article processing fees. Early publications (≤18 months from the conference date) had higher median journal impact factors compared to later publications. Approximately 42% of the published abstracts had collaborations with the Institute for Cl...
2003
Pak J Med Sci 2003 Vol. 19 No. 4 www. pjms. com. pk 243 editors, guiding the authors and better communication amongst the editors. Pakistan Medical Journalists Association (PMJA) is proud to have organized two workshops on Peer Review System for the first time in Pakistan5. The importance of having good functional editorial board, having a statistician on the Board, encouraging young professionals and able diligent young scientists was also highlighted.
Lessons learnt from the Asia-Pacific Association of Medical Journal Editors (APAME) Congress
2011
Shaukat Ali Jawaid who can help the authors in analysis of the data besides providing them guidance and assistance. The issues which came under discussion at the APAME congress were almost the same ie failure of the authors to read and follow instructions, duplicate publication, peer review, plagiarism, authorship issues, increasing visibility of the journals, inclusions of journals in various important databases etc. Solution to these problems was also discussed in detail.
A Scientometric Profile on Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Science in Scopus
International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 2017
The present study is based on the Scientometricis analysis of 113 research article published in SCOPUS on Malaysian journal of medicine & health science during the period of 2012-2016. This Study will review on year-wise distribution, Authorship pattern of contributions, Author wise distribution, Institution wise distribution, country-wise distribution, Length of Article wise distribution. The findings must reveal various aspects of the characteristics and patterns of contributions of the study.
Trend and impact of international collaboration in clinical medicine papers published in Malaysia
Scientometrics, 2013
Research collaboration is the way forward in order to improve quality and impact of its research findings. International research collaboration has resulted in international co-authorship in scientific communications and publications. This study highlights the collaborating research and authorship trend in clinical medicine in Malaysia from 2001 to 2010. Malaysian-based author affiliation in the Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded) and clinical medicine journals (n = 999) and articles (n = 3951) as of 30th Oct 2011 were downloaded. Types of document analyzed were articles and reviews, and impact factors (IF) in the 2010 Journal Citation Report Science Edition were taken to access the quality of the articles. The number of publications in clinical medicine increased from 4.5 % (n = 178) in 2001 to 23.9 % (n = 944) in 2010. The top three contributors in the subject categories are
Saudi Medical Journal, 2016
Objectives: To compare the journal impact factor)JIF(and Eigenfactor score)ES(of Institute for Scientific Information)ISI(-indexed biomedical journals published from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia)KSA(over the last 8 years. Methods: This is a retrospective study, conducted at Alfaisal University, Riyadh, KSA from January to March 2016. The Journal Citation Reports of ISI Web of Knowledge were accessed, and 6 Saudi biomedical journals were included for analysis. Results: All Saudi journals have improved their IF compared with their baseline. However, the performance of the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Neurosciences has been exceptionally good. The biggest improvement in percent growth in JIF was seen in the Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal)approximately 887%(followed by Neurosciences)approximately 462%(. Interestingly, the ES of all biomedical journals, except Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology and Saudi Medical Journal, increased over the years. The greatest growth in ES)more than 5 fold(was noted for Neurosciences and Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. Conclusion: This study shows that the overall quality of all Saudi biomedical journals has improved in the last 8 years.