Organizational Form as a Mechanism to Involve staff, Public and Users in Public Services: A Study of the Governance of NHS Foundation Trusts (original) (raw)
Related papers
Social Science & Medicine, 2006
The article considers the role of public involvement in the NHS in the context of the wider shift from government to governance. Based on a comparative case study, it identifies different outcomes, from a single policy initiative in two localities. It argues, following Jessop, that accounts which rest on inter-organizational relationships are inadequate, and that we also need to look at inter-systemic and inter-personal levels for more complete explanations. Investigating the relationships between these levels, we derive an account of governance within which to situate the role of public involvement. It is against this background that we focus on why the methods of involvement deserve greater attention for their substantive contribution to its quality and effectiveness.
Public …, 2011
New governance arrangements for NHS Foundation Trusts (FTs) aimed to replace centralized state ownership of acute English hospitals with a new form of social ownership. Under this, trusts would exist as independent public interest organizations on the model of mutuals and co-operative societies. Assessing the impact of the new arrangements on the management structure of four acute hospitals, we demonstrate that FTs have failed to deliver social ownership and local accountability on this model. We suggest that policy-makers should re-frame the governance apparatus associated with mutualism and social ownership in terms of the concept of meta-regulation. By re-framing governors as meta-regulators, regulatory institutions would acquire new powers to steer FTs towards sustainable forms of compliance via non-coercive, non-intrusive means.
Governance of UK NHS Trusts: the Annual General Meeting
Corporate Governance, 2004
The Annual General Meeting (AGM) is a mechanism of governance used in both public and private sectors of the economy, but the AGM has rarely been the focus of research studies. This paper reports an investigation of attendance and procedures at the AGMs of National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. Analysis of the results is informed through the concept of regulatory space. Attendance at trust AGMs is low with, on average, more employees than external stakeholders at the meeting. The absence of any decision-making authority at trust AGMs is explained by the existence of other mechanisms of governance and control in trusts' regulatory space. The creation of Foundation Trusts, which are intended to have increased local autonomy, will provide new opportunities to examine the role of the AGM as a mechanism of governance in the publicly funded health sector.
2019
The aim of this thesis is to explore the role and nature of Community Interest Companies (CICs) in the delivery of health care services in the English NHS. CICs are a hybrid form of organisation insofar as they exist to generate wider social impact through their commercial practices. The thesis draws on theories of New Public Management and Governance to trace the changing role of the state in the context of public service delivery and highlights how these shifts facilitate the growth of alternative providers like CICs in publicly funded health care. To achieve this aim the thesis explores a number of connected questions analysing whether CICs are a new form of governance in health service delivery or the Emperor’s New Clothes? Is the claim to a wider social mission and greater accountability exclusive to CICs? Or could other providers of health care, both private and public, make a similar claim by virtue of what they do rather than their legal status? To this end the study exami...
Repositioning the Boundaries between Public and Private Healthcare Providers in the English NHS
Journal of Health Organization and Management, 2019
Purpose-Neo-liberal "reform" has in many countries shifted services across the boundary between the public and private sector. This policy reopens the question of what structural and managerial differences, if any, differences of ownership make to healthcare providers. The purpose of this paper is to examine the connections between ownership, organisational structure and managerial regime within an elaboration of Donabedian's reasoning about organisational structures. Using new data from England, it considers: how do the internal managerial regimes of differently owned healthcare providers differ, or not? In what respects did any such differences arise from differences in ownership or for other reasons? Design/methodology/approach-An observational systematic qualitative comparison of differently owned providers was the strongest feasible research design. The authors systematically compared a maximum variety (by ownership) sample of community health services; out-of-hours primary care; and hospital planned orthopaedics and ophthalmology providers (n ¼ 12 cases). The framework of comparison was the ownership theory mentioned above.
Lessons from New Zealand for England's NHS Foundation Trusts
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2004
The legislation to devolve responsibility for the management and operation of England's top-performing NHS hospitals to community-owned NHS Foundation Trusts raises several issues relating to the challenges posed to governance structures by private non-profit ownership and control of assets used to provide government-financed services. Building upon the lessons learned from devolution of public hospital governance in New Zealand to boards at arm's-length from central control during the 1990s, this paper analyses the English NHS hospital changes. Whilst local political accountability and competition between hospitals indicate that the English reforms may be more successful in meeting patients' needs more efficiently than the New Zealand reforms, the English proposals may be compromised by the ability of staff to become members of Trusts, boards bearing risks of decisions outside their control whilst simultaneously being insulated from the consequences of their decisions b...