Contested Imaginaries and the Cultural Political Economy of Climate Change (original) (raw)
Related papers
The analytical core of this study is the historical development of the relationship between nature and the capitalist mode of production. In particular, we aim at shedding light on the process through which the "grammar" of ecological crisis (and consequently of its possible solutions) turned into an exclusively economic one. In addressing this issue we discuss the successive problematisations of the environment that took place since the emergence of biopolitical governmentality (late Eighteenth century). Following
Editorial: Is There a New Climate Politics?
Politics and Governance, 2021
Addressing climate change globally requires significant transformations of production and consumption systems. The language around climate action has shifted tangibly over the last five years to reflect this. Indeed, thousands of local governments, national governments, universities and scientists have declared a climate emergency. Some commentators argue that the emergency framing conveys a new and more appropriate level of urgency needed to respond to climate challenges; to create a social tipping point in the fight against climate change. Others are concerned to move on from such emergency rhetoric to urgent action. Beyond emergency declarations, new spaces of, and places for, engagement with climate change are emerging. The public square, the exhibition hall, the law courts, and the investors’ forum are just some of the arenas where climate change politics are now being negotiated. Emergent governing mechanisms are being utilised, from citizens’ assemblies to ecocide lawsuits. N...
The Bare Life Review, 2021
I provide an account of how the climate issue has been depoliticized in mainstream climate change discourse, especially in the Global North, and particularly how political leaders in the U.S. have displaced the social conflicts driving global warming’s current and future population upheavals by appealing to various kinds of “climate nationalism.” I also briefly examine an alternative climate politics that locates the solution to surplus carbon in diverse, global struggles to submit the global economy to democratic control, and in doing so to redirect the “reproduction of real life” towards the satisfaction of social needs rather than the accumulation of private wealth.
The Non-political Politics of Climate Change
The climate change bandwagon has decidedly gone off course in recent years. The onslaught of the deepest and most structural crisis of capitalism of the last 70 years that struck the cozy neoliberal consensus as a bombshell in the fall of 2008 and the subsequent hectic formation of a new commons of the bourgeoisie to assure that all political energies are mobilized to get the sputtering accumulation engine going again, irrespective of the social and environmental cost, has decidedly altered the elite's political agenda. While environmental-and in particular climate change-concerns increasingly dominated the agenda in earlier years, the last few years saw a resurgence of an obsession with getting accumulation for accumulation sake going again. The eagerly awaited (at least by those concerned by the climatic predicament we are in) COP15 climate conference in 2009 in Copenhagen and its 2011 successor Durban meeting turned out to be utterly disappointing. The elites' concerns turned yet again to where it normally is, i.e. making sure that the neoliberal order can survive somewhat longer. As the commons of the bourgeoisie rallied around making sure that collective political and financial efforts were directed to re-booting capitalist growth, climate concerns were relegated again to the backburner of policy agendas and retreated to the sphere of climate activism. This special issue testifies nonetheless to the continuing importance and relevance of climate politics, and attempts in a variety of ways to both take stock of the situation we are in and distil key political lessons to be learned. In this short opening commentary, I will briefly explore the contours of the strange non-political politics that have marked the terrain of climate change over the past few years and 1 Published under the Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works. This is partly based and abridged from Swyngedouw E (2011).
Mapping the catastrophic imaginary The organisation of environmental politics through climate change
Environment and Planning E, 2023
Stories about the end of the world continue to pile up daily. There isn't any sense of respite from the litany of horrors we are presented with. The eerie atmosphere of ecological catastrophe colonises our political imaginations. Understanding how we collectively imagine the end of the world, and thus how we understand what is happening, why and how, as well as what we must and can do, is politically crucial. The vast tapestry of environmental crises makes the role of the imagination central; not only in terms of being able to know the crises, but in setting out what is concretely possible and what is cruel fantasy. This paper sets out to map the imaginary of ecological catastrophe as drawn from the body of non-fiction literature that fuels much contemporary environmental activism in the Global North. Taking up the work of a series of environmental writer-activists in order to outline the various refrains that comprise the core of the eco-catastrophic imaginary, I aim to sketch how the slow violence of the present is being narrated as a political event, and what possibilities for averting disaster appear possible. It is the argument of this paper that how we collectively imagine the cacophony of environmental disasters presently unfolding shapes the field of political action.
Rethinking Political Contestation over Climate Change
This working paper argues for a radical democratic approach to climate change. It begins by presenting and analysing various alternative approaches: ‘magical-technology’; ‘economic-market’; ‘ethical-individual’; ‘green-citizens’; ‘deliberative democratic’; ‘eco-authoritarian’ and ‘sceptical’ approaches. The aim here is to point out the existence of different, sometimes incommensurable perspectives, ideas, and values regarding climate change. These approaches all have valuable insights to contribute to the debate over climate change. However, the paper also identifies a common assumption held by proponents of these different approaches; that this highly complex environmental issue can only be tackled if disagreement is overcome or suppressed. The radical democratic approach, on the contrary, suggests that a legitimate politics of climate change demands strong decision making and collective action that requires not the closing down but rather the opening up of political disagreement. A radical democratic approach acknowledges the heated, contested socio-political climate surrounding climate change and attempts to put it to use in contemporary environmental policy making. This approach advocates the celebration of alternative perspectives rather than the suppression of opposition. To dismiss outright any opposing perspectives as ‘irrational’ is to stupidly preclude the democratic expression of disagreement and to risk enhancing extremist anti-democratic viewpoints. Instead of the dominant technocratic focus upon the scientific and economic ‘solutions’ to climate change, emphasis should be placed on the conditions in which to secure the expression of diverse opinions and the legitimate disagreements between them
Society Register, 2021
The conceptual approach to real social phenomena and problems, as well as factors influencing and shaping them, although theoretical in nature, has momentous practical consequences. The issue of nature, and in a narrower sense of climate, constitutes a telling and representative example of the implications of the theoretical and methodological orientation adopted to study society and its relationship with the environment and its resources. This short paper aims to highlight the consequences of the shift in research perspective from ‘political economy’ to ‘political sociology’ in the context of climate change and its challenges. The article’s main argument is to outline the implications of the change of reference point for the conceptualisation and operationalisation of theoretical frameworks related to social problems and challenges, which, nota bene, are conditioned directly and indirectly by the state of the ecosystem. And the central thesis is that a fundamental reorientation tow...