The evaluation of the tutor support in a distance learning institution. Publication of the conference proceedings, The 9th Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning: United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0749245425 (original) (raw)

AI-generated Abstract

The paper evaluates tutor support in distance learning institutions, particularly focusing on the Open University (OU) UK, where it highlights the critical role of individualized tutoring and counseling in enhancing student success. It discusses historical context, the evolution of student support systems, and identifies significant areas for improvement, such as better management of student workload and more effective tutor-student interactions amidst complex learning environments.

Figures (26)

Table 1: Profile and number of students interviewed

Table 1: Profile and number of students interviewed

The deep and surface approach to learning was first introduced by Marton and S4ljé in the 1970s. Ramsden(1988) provides a summary of the two approaches:  ' want to suggest that the University requires a deep learning approach, but that the three sroups dealing with the Assessment in Education assignment, took a surface approach. The issignment demanded that students go beyond ‘the signs’, and extrapolate the principles from he material as a whole. Students were unable to do so, and looked instead for the discrete -lements. Clearly the numerical cue of “five” was important for students. Their previous study experiences primed them to look for a list in the material with the number “five” in it. n particular, the group who ended up listing assessment methods in their assignment, saw the ask as an external imposition, with no thought as to how it may improve their own teaching yractice.

The deep and surface approach to learning was first introduced by Marton and S4ljé in the 1970s. Ramsden(1988) provides a summary of the two approaches: ' want to suggest that the University requires a deep learning approach, but that the three sroups dealing with the Assessment in Education assignment, took a surface approach. The issignment demanded that students go beyond ‘the signs’, and extrapolate the principles from he material as a whole. Students were unable to do so, and looked instead for the discrete -lements. Clearly the numerical cue of “five” was important for students. Their previous study experiences primed them to look for a list in the material with the number “five” in it. n particular, the group who ended up listing assessment methods in their assignment, saw the ask as an external imposition, with no thought as to how it may improve their own teaching yractice.

Figure 1.Drag-and-Drop COOLTool

Figure 1.Drag-and-Drop COOLTool

The Typist tool in Figure 2 shows the next level of the interactive tools for students to practise APA referencing. While the main COOLTool focusses on referencing styles for individual referencing entries, the Typist tool was created to help students move to the next level - compiling a reference list, and a title page - without Ieaving the site. Once again, feedback and hints were provided.

The Typist tool in Figure 2 shows the next level of the interactive tools for students to practise APA referencing. While the main COOLTool focusses on referencing styles for individual referencing entries, the Typist tool was created to help students move to the next level - compiling a reference list, and a title page - without Ieaving the site. Once again, feedback and hints were provided.

Table 1: What are the most important qualities and skills a tutor should possess? - the students’ and tutors’ perspectives.  Particularly interesting is the indication that tutors do not regard ‘knowing the subject’ as important as students; tutors give this a rating of 4 rather than the score of 1 shared by both conventional and e-students. Previous work confirms that students expect tutors to be knowledgeable and know the course intimately and see the tutor as the subject expert with high level cognitive skills. They see a tutor’s skills as ‘knowledge-based’ and tutorials as relatively didactic tutor-centred occasions for students to assimilate what they traditionally understand as ‘knowledge’ — quantitative data as a set of facts, which can be applied (Stevenson op.cit). Those tutors who responded to our survey may, on the other hand, be more ‘progressive’ and focus on the learner rather than a traditional ‘teacher’, seeing themselves as facilitators of students’ learning rather than the all-knowing expert. The facilitative style is not always easily undertaken by tutors as Brew and Wright discovered in a survey of the teaching style of UKOU tutor-counsellors (Brew and Wright®). While some early online teaching merely replicated traditional didactic styles by, for example, placing traditional materials on the web, there is great potential for electronic media 'to facilitate a migration from traditional didactic modes to more learner-managed learning modes if teachers and designers wish to take such a journey' as Coomey and Stephenson discuss in their paradigm grid for online learning (Coomey and Stephenson 2001°)

Table 1: What are the most important qualities and skills a tutor should possess? - the students’ and tutors’ perspectives. Particularly interesting is the indication that tutors do not regard ‘knowing the subject’ as important as students; tutors give this a rating of 4 rather than the score of 1 shared by both conventional and e-students. Previous work confirms that students expect tutors to be knowledgeable and know the course intimately and see the tutor as the subject expert with high level cognitive skills. They see a tutor’s skills as ‘knowledge-based’ and tutorials as relatively didactic tutor-centred occasions for students to assimilate what they traditionally understand as ‘knowledge’ — quantitative data as a set of facts, which can be applied (Stevenson op.cit). Those tutors who responded to our survey may, on the other hand, be more ‘progressive’ and focus on the learner rather than a traditional ‘teacher’, seeing themselves as facilitators of students’ learning rather than the all-knowing expert. The facilitative style is not always easily undertaken by tutors as Brew and Wright discovered in a survey of the teaching style of UKOU tutor-counsellors (Brew and Wright®). While some early online teaching merely replicated traditional didactic styles by, for example, placing traditional materials on the web, there is great potential for electronic media 'to facilitate a migration from traditional didactic modes to more learner-managed learning modes if teachers and designers wish to take such a journey' as Coomey and Stephenson discuss in their paradigm grid for online learning (Coomey and Stephenson 2001°)

Table 1 Responses to WebCT evaluation questionnaire

Table 1 Responses to WebCT evaluation questionnaire

Technology in distance education  In the traditional on-campus situation technology is used to support teaching and learning, but in distance education, technology is used to deliver the course (Billings 1996:263). <A distance-learning programme has unique challenges related to the characteristics of students and the geographic distance between lecturers and students (Coleman, Smith, Alexy & Palmer 2001:9). The use of technology is a significant means to increase access to adult education. This is the case at the University of Pretoria. Each school of nursing needs to explore its own needs and resources to determine how and to what extent it can deliver education via distance technology (Distance 2000:117).

Technology in distance education In the traditional on-campus situation technology is used to support teaching and learning, but in distance education, technology is used to deliver the course (Billings 1996:263). <A distance-learning programme has unique challenges related to the characteristics of students and the geographic distance between lecturers and students (Coleman, Smith, Alexy & Palmer 2001:9). The use of technology is a significant means to increase access to adult education. This is the case at the University of Pretoria. Each school of nursing needs to explore its own needs and resources to determine how and to what extent it can deliver education via distance technology (Distance 2000:117).

The lecturer is in the Telematic studio during the broadcast. She introduces the video and has a short discussion with students regarding the content. The video is then shown and afterwards the students may ask questions by making a phone call. The lecturer then repeats the question, as students at the other centres cannot hear the question, before she answers it.  It is however required of students to come to the broadcasts prepared. They should have gone through the learning content, read articles, textbooks and used other prescribed and supportive material to enable them to follow the broadcast and add to their preparation. This issue will be addressed further on in the paper.  The use of video technology for distance education became popular because it provides more of the traditional classroom “feel” as the lecturer can be seen on screen, and the students are able to communicate with the lecturer by means of audio interaction (Armstrong et al 2000:64). Currently one-way pre-recorded video, one-way video and two-way audio is used. Six subjects/courses are being televised by means of satellite television. Those students, who have access at their homes to this type of technology, are able to watch broadcasts from home and contact the lecturer by means of the telephone. Nine viewing centres, in three provinces (see figure 2), are available to students who are not able to watch broadcasts from home.

The lecturer is in the Telematic studio during the broadcast. She introduces the video and has a short discussion with students regarding the content. The video is then shown and afterwards the students may ask questions by making a phone call. The lecturer then repeats the question, as students at the other centres cannot hear the question, before she answers it. It is however required of students to come to the broadcasts prepared. They should have gone through the learning content, read articles, textbooks and used other prescribed and supportive material to enable them to follow the broadcast and add to their preparation. This issue will be addressed further on in the paper. The use of video technology for distance education became popular because it provides more of the traditional classroom “feel” as the lecturer can be seen on screen, and the students are able to communicate with the lecturer by means of audio interaction (Armstrong et al 2000:64). Currently one-way pre-recorded video, one-way video and two-way audio is used. Six subjects/courses are being televised by means of satellite television. Those students, who have access at their homes to this type of technology, are able to watch broadcasts from home and contact the lecturer by means of the telephone. Nine viewing centres, in three provinces (see figure 2), are available to students who are not able to watch broadcasts from home.

Lecturers concerned with Telematic Education at the Department of Nursing attended a course in Television Presentation in March 2001. This was unfortunately only after they have already been presenting courses by means of Telematic broadcast since 1996. The programmes are still being presented and due to the training the lecturers now have future products that will be of a better quality.

Lecturers concerned with Telematic Education at the Department of Nursing attended a course in Television Presentation in March 2001. This was unfortunately only after they have already been presenting courses by means of Telematic broadcast since 1996. The programmes are still being presented and due to the training the lecturers now have future products that will be of a better quality.

Figure 3: The flexible learner (Department for TLE! at UP)

Figure 3: The flexible learner (Department for TLE! at UP)

Table 1 shows the enrollment of the Graduate School by location. “Main campus only” means that the graduate students study at the Tsukuba Campus only. These are full time students and some adult learners who live or work near the Tsukuba campus. “Main campus and satellite office’ means that the graduate students sometimes study and take a class in Tsukuba depending on the subject. In many cases, the students go to the Tsukuba campus to take intensive classes or to take a few classes once a week. “Satellite office only” means that  the students study at the satellite office only, and they do not go to the Tsukuba campus to attend classes.  In 2000, the university established the Graduate School of Information and Media Studies for doctoral students and opened a satellite office in Tokyo, one hour by train from its main Tsukuba campus. At the satellite office, some professors teach classes, while others teach classes by teleconference system from Tsukuba. One specific aim of the university was to  accept adult learners, especially incumbent librarians and incumbent workers in the information industry.

Table 1 shows the enrollment of the Graduate School by location. “Main campus only” means that the graduate students study at the Tsukuba Campus only. These are full time students and some adult learners who live or work near the Tsukuba campus. “Main campus and satellite office’ means that the graduate students sometimes study and take a class in Tsukuba depending on the subject. In many cases, the students go to the Tsukuba campus to take intensive classes or to take a few classes once a week. “Satellite office only” means that the students study at the satellite office only, and they do not go to the Tsukuba campus to attend classes. In 2000, the university established the Graduate School of Information and Media Studies for doctoral students and opened a satellite office in Tokyo, one hour by train from its main Tsukuba campus. At the satellite office, some professors teach classes, while others teach classes by teleconference system from Tsukuba. One specific aim of the university was to accept adult learners, especially incumbent librarians and incumbent workers in the information industry.

The University has established Telelearning Centres to provide for state-of-art hardware and software, computing and communications facilities to students (Figure 2). The emphasis is on enabling learners to independently access learning resources and participate in synchronous and asynchronous interaction. The components of the learning package include: live, satellite-based teleconferencing lectures; recorded lectures; practical laboratories; CBTs; internet learning resources; on-line interactive chat groups including members of the peer group, faculty and external experts.

The University has established Telelearning Centres to provide for state-of-art hardware and software, computing and communications facilities to students (Figure 2). The emphasis is on enabling learners to independently access learning resources and participate in synchronous and asynchronous interaction. The components of the learning package include: live, satellite-based teleconferencing lectures; recorded lectures; practical laboratories; CBTs; internet learning resources; on-line interactive chat groups including members of the peer group, faculty and external experts.

Satellite-mediated teleconferencing is being widely used by the University and other user agencies. Client groups have considerably expanded in terms of range of applications sought and size of audience reached nationwide or region-wide for training provision. Reaching the disadvantaged in remote and educationally backward districts has been a major emphasis area. The University has established technology-enhanced learning centres in such districts  across the country.

Satellite-mediated teleconferencing is being widely used by the University and other user agencies. Client groups have considerably expanded in terms of range of applications sought and size of audience reached nationwide or region-wide for training provision. Reaching the disadvantaged in remote and educationally backward districts has been a major emphasis area. The University has established technology-enhanced learning centres in such districts across the country.

TABLE II: Demographic Details of the Sample

TABLE II: Demographic Details of the Sample

TABLE IV: Preference of Aged Distance Learners

TABLE IV: Preference of Aged Distance Learners

This shows that good number of aged learners are continuing their studies further.  Most of the programmes are either one-semester/year duration, where reregistration is not required for continuation. Among the above, there are programmes like BPP,BDP,DIM,MBA,MCA,BSc(N), BTS and ADCM which need reregistration. This will show whether they are capable of or their interest is sustained to continue further. The reregistration data for this is analysed in respect of how many have paid fees for one semester/year, and continued further. It is given in following Table.

This shows that good number of aged learners are continuing their studies further. Most of the programmes are either one-semester/year duration, where reregistration is not required for continuation. Among the above, there are programmes like BPP,BDP,DIM,MBA,MCA,BSc(N), BTS and ADCM which need reregistration. This will show whether they are capable of or their interest is sustained to continue further. The reregistration data for this is analysed in respect of how many have paid fees for one semester/year, and continued further. It is given in following Table.

TABLE 1: RANGE OF RESPONSES TO ITEMS IN THE ACTIVITIES  When the responses of 1998 and 1999 are compared, there is no significant difference. Learners in general reviewed the various statements positively. This indicates that the activities were sufficiently challenging to hold their interest, that learners understood what was required and that the activities were relevant for their practice. Learners responded less positively to the writing of their own case studies. The vast majority of learners who were  studying through their second or third language may account for the difficulties experienced in writing the case studies.

TABLE 1: RANGE OF RESPONSES TO ITEMS IN THE ACTIVITIES When the responses of 1998 and 1999 are compared, there is no significant difference. Learners in general reviewed the various statements positively. This indicates that the activities were sufficiently challenging to hold their interest, that learners understood what was required and that the activities were relevant for their practice. Learners responded less positively to the writing of their own case studies. The vast majority of learners who were studying through their second or third language may account for the difficulties experienced in writing the case studies.

TABLE 2: RESPONSES TO GENERAL COMMENTS OF THE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM

TABLE 2: RESPONSES TO GENERAL COMMENTS OF THE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM

Referring to the learners’ initial knowledge of Personnel Management, only 10,6% and 11,4% rated their management competence before completing the activities in the assignment as good or excellent. Regarding the statement “I feel better equipped after completing the assignment”, 97,3% and 99,6% indicated agreement during 1998 and 1999 respectively. As was mentioned earlier, the activities in the assignment required learners’ active participation in various management areas. The successful completion of these activities contributed to the learners’ experience of increased competence. In providing a learning environment which supports higher-order critical skills, learners developed metacognitive skills that enabled them to learn in various situations in which they might find themselves as professionals (cf Hobson 1996:56). These skills entail the development of thinking and decision-making skills and skills for evaluating their actions (Hobson 1996:56).

Referring to the learners’ initial knowledge of Personnel Management, only 10,6% and 11,4% rated their management competence before completing the activities in the assignment as good or excellent. Regarding the statement “I feel better equipped after completing the assignment”, 97,3% and 99,6% indicated agreement during 1998 and 1999 respectively. As was mentioned earlier, the activities in the assignment required learners’ active participation in various management areas. The successful completion of these activities contributed to the learners’ experience of increased competence. In providing a learning environment which supports higher-order critical skills, learners developed metacognitive skills that enabled them to learn in various situations in which they might find themselves as professionals (cf Hobson 1996:56). These skills entail the development of thinking and decision-making skills and skills for evaluating their actions (Hobson 1996:56).

Fig. 1: Dual structure of OET

Fig. 1: Dual structure of OET

The objectives for the international modules are that through the utilisation of the telelearning tools, the participants themselves learn to make a self-assessment of telelearning. Here you will be given the opportunity to both discuss in groups and try out the possibilities and constraints of computer supported communication as a learning and teaching medium.

The objectives for the international modules are that through the utilisation of the telelearning tools, the participants themselves learn to make a self-assessment of telelearning. Here you will be given the opportunity to both discuss in groups and try out the possibilities and constraints of computer supported communication as a learning and teaching medium.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (224)

  1. Bertram, C. (2000a) Student Evaluation of the UN/SACTE B.Ed: June 2000. Unpublished report. School of Education, Training and Development, University of Natal.
  2. Bertram, C. (2000b) A mixed mode distance education model for teacher education: rationale, student experiences and quality. Presented at the second NADEOSA conference "Southern African Models of Distance Education". 21, 22 August 2000, Pretoria.
  3. Butcher, N. (1996) The investigation of teacher education at a distance in South Africa. Open Learning through Distance Education, 2 (1).
  4. Cummins, J. (1984) Bilingualism and Special Education: Issues in Assessment and Pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  5. Fraser, W.J. and van Staden, C.J.S. (1996) Students' opinions on factors influencing drop out rates and performance at distance education institutions. South African Journal of Education, 16(4). Gouws, A. (1998) From social interaction to higher levels of thinking. In N. Kruger and H. Adams (eds) Psychology for teaching and learning. Johannesburg: Heinemann.
  6. Hodgson, B. (1993) Key terms and issues in open and distance learning. London: Kogan Page. John, V. (2000) Learner support needs within the UN/SACTE distance programme: towards broader and more formalised support. Paper presented at the second NADEOSA conference, Pretoria, 21 -22 August 2000.
  7. Morgan, A.R. (1995) Student learning and students' experiences: research, theory and practice. In F. Lockwood (ed.) Open and Distance Learning Today. London: Routledge.
  8. Moore, M.G. (1993) Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, M. John and D. Keegan Distance Education: new perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
  9. Perraton, H.D. (1995) Quality in Distance Education. In One World, Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance Learning. Selected papers from the 17 th World Conference of the International Council for Distance Education, Birmingham, United Kingdom, June 1995, ed. D. Sewart. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University Ramsden, P. (1988) Improving Learning: New Perspectives. London: Kogan Page.
  10. Rowntree, D. (1987) Assessing students: How shall we know them? London: Kogan Page.
  11. Simpson, 0. (2000) Supporting students in open and distance learning. London: Kogan Page. Tait, A. (1995) Student support in open and distance learning. In F. Lockwood (ed.) Open and Distance Learning Today. London: Routledge.
  12. Welch, T. (2001) The need for flexibility of provision in the professional development of teachers. Open Learning through Distance Education. March 2001, Vol 7, no. 1 . References
  13. Bradshaw, J. (1977) 'The concept of social need', in M. Fitzgerald, P Halmos, J. Muncie and D. Zeldin (eds) Welfare in Action, London, Routledge, 33 -36.
  14. Bucheim, H. (1968) 'The SS -instrument of domination' in H. Krausnick et al (1968) pp 303 - 396. Campion, M. (2001) 'The new Great Debate' Open Learning, 16 (1): 69 -83.
  15. Duke, C. (1992) The Learning University: towards a new paradigm, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
  16. Hoess, R. (1961) Commandant of Auschwitz, trans. Constantine Fitzgibbon, London, Pan Books. Hughes .E. C. (1958) Men and their Work, Free Press, New York, cited in Occupational Categories and Cultures 1, (1978) D351 6-8 People and Work: a third level course, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
  17. Krausnick, H. Bucheim, H. Brosat, M. and Jacobsen, H. A. (1968) Anatomy of the SS State, London, Collins.
  18. Langmore, J. Aspects of the Governance of Globalisation, Keith Roby Memorial lecture, June 2001, Murdoch University, Perth Western Australia. Occupational Categories and Cultures 1, (1978) D351 6-8 People and Work: a third level course, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
  19. Musgrove, F. (1978) 'The Domesticated University', the New Universities Quarterly, 32(4), 402 -412.
  20. Wilson, R. N. (1964) 'The poet in American Society', in Wilson R.N. (ed) The Arts in Society, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall Inc, PP 1-34.
  21. Woollacott, J. Deviant and Dirty Work in Occupational Categories and Cultures 1, (1978) D351 6-8 People and Work: a third level course, Milton Keynes, Open University Press. P 93 -128. References
  22. Adler, J., Lelliott, T., Reed, Y., Bapoo, A., Brodie, K., Dikgomo, P., Nyabanyaba, T., Roman, A., Setati, M., Slonimsky, L., Davis, H. and De Wet, H 1998. Mixed-mode FDE's and their effects: a study of the classroom practices of primary and secondary mathematics, science and English language teachers enrolled in the Wits Further Diplomas in Education Programme. Interim Report, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
  23. Bertram, C 2000. A mixed mode distance education model for teacher education: Rationale, student experiences and quality. Paper presented at the 2nd NADEOSA conference, Pretoria, South Africa.
  24. Fage, J and Mayes, R 1996. Monitoring learners' progress, in Mills & Tait 1996: 206-221.
  25. Glennie, J 1996. Towards learner-centred distance education in the changing South African context, in Mills & Tait 1996: 19-33.
  26. Gordon, A 2001. SAIDE's rural education research project: The Jozini case study. Open Learning through Distance Education, vol. 7 no. 1, 10-12.
  27. Holmberg, B 1981. Status and trends of distance education. New York: Nichols.
  28. Holt, D 1994. Peer Group Learning in Open and Distance Education. Teaching and Learning in Open and Distance Education 2: Study Guide Section 2. University of South Australia.
  29. Leach, J 1996. Learning in practice: Support for professional development, in Mills, R & Tait 1996: 101-126
  30. Lelliott, A.D., Pendlebury, S. and Enslin, P. A. 2000. Lelliott, A., Pendlebury, S. and Enslin. 2000. Promises of access and inclusion: Online Education in Africa. J. Philos. Education 34 1 pp 41-52.
  31. Maher, P and Rewt, P 2001. Using the telephone to support isolated learners. Paper presented at the 20 th World Conference of the International Council for Open and Distance Education, Dusseldorf, Germany.
  32. Mays, T 2000. Learner support: a South African programme perspective. Paper presented at the 2nd NADEOSA conference, Pretoria, South Africa. BIBLIOGRAPHY
  33. Daniel, J. (1996) Mega-Universities and Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher Education (London, Kogan Page).
  34. Fraser, S. & Deane, E. (1998) Doers and Thinkers: An Investigation of the Use of Open- Learning Strategies to Develop Life-Long Learning_Competencies in Undergraduate Science Students (Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia).
  35. Melton, R. (1997) Objectives, Competences & Learning Outcomes: Developing Instructional Materials in Open and Distance Learning (London, Kogan Page).
  36. Ottewill, R.& Hudson, A. (1997) Electronic information resource use, ALT-J Association for Learning Technology Journal, 5, pp.31-41.
  37. Rowntree, D. (1991) Teaching Through Self-Instruction (London, Kogan Page).
  38. Phipps, R. & Merisotis, J. (2000) Quality On the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet- Based Distance Education (Washington, The Institute for Higher Education).
  39. Yetton, P. and Associates (1997) Managing the Introduction of Technology in the Delivery and Administration of Higher Education (Canberra, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Commonwealth of Australia).
  40. Asbee, S., and Simpson, 0. (1998), 'Partners, family, friends: student support of the closest kind', Open Learning 13 (3).
  41. Stevenson, K., Sander, P., and Naylor, P. (1996), 'Student perceptions of the tutor's role in distance learning', Open Learning 11 (1).
  42. Gaskell, A., and Simpson, 0. (2000), 'Student support in distance education -what do students want from their tutor?', conference paper, EDEN Prague 2000.
  43. Davies, P. (1998), 'What makes for a satisfied student?' , FEDA Bulletin 2 (7).
  44. Brew, A. and Wright, T. (1990), 'Changing teaching styles', Distance Education 11 (2), 1992.
  45. Coomey, M., and Stephenson, J., (2001) 'Online learning: it is all about dialogue, involvement, support and control', in Stephenson, J., (ed) (2001), Teaching and Learning Online, London, Kogan Page.
  46. Alexander, S., and Boud, D. (2001), 'Learners still learn from experience when online', in Stephenson, J., (ed.) (2001), Teaching and Learning Online, London, Kogan Page.
  47. Edwards, R. (1997), Changing places? Flexibility, lifelong learning and a learning society, London, Routledge.
  48. Kolb, D.A., (1993), 'The process of experiential learning', in Thorpe, M., Edwards, R., and Hanson, A., (ed) (1993) Culture and Processes of Adult Learning, London, Routledge.
  49. Bertram, C. (2001) Massification with integrity?: Reflections on a mixed-mode teacher education programme. Paper presented at the Globalisation and Higher Education: Views from the South conference. 27-29 March 2001, Cape Town.
  50. Bilston, B. (1996) Supporting older learners in open and distance learning. In Mills, R. and Tait, A. (eds) Supporting the learner in Open and Distance learning. Pitman, London.
  51. Jarvis, P. (1995) Adult and Continuing Education: Theory and practice. Routledge, London.
  52. John, V.M. (2000) Learner support needs within the UN/SACTE distance programme: towards broader and more formalised support. Paper presented at the Second NADEOSA conference: "Southern African Models of Distance Education". 21-22 August 2000, Pretoria. Ministry of Education (1997) Education White Paper 3: A Programme for the Transformation of Higher Education (1997). Http://www.polity.org.za/govdocs/white papers/highered.html Ministry of Education (2001) National Plan for Higher Education.
  53. Http://education.pwv.gov.za/doe sites/Higher EdPaul, R. (1988) If student services are so important, then why are we cutting them back? In Sewart, D. and Daniel, J. Developing distance education. Papers submitted to the 14 th ICDE world conference, Oslo, August 1988. International Council for Distance Education, Oslo.
  54. Daniel, J. (2000) Inventing the online university, paper presented on the occasion of the opening of the Open University of Hong Kong Learning Centre.
  55. Gilbert, A. (2000) Interview on ABCs Radio national's weekly investigative documentary: Background briefing, 16 July 2000.
  56. King, B. (2001) Managing the changing nature of distance and open education at institutional level, Open Learning, 16(1), pp. 47-60.
  57. McCloughlin, C. & Marshall. L. (2000) Scaffolding: A model for learner support in an online teaching environment. In A. Henmann and M.M. Kulski (Eds), Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching. Proceedings of the 9 th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2-4 February 2000. Perth: Curtain University of Technology.
  58. Moe, M. & Blodgett, H. (2000) The Knowledge Web (San Francisco, Merrill Lynch & Co.). The National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (1997) Higher education in the learning society: The Report of the national committee of inquiry into higher education in the United Kingdom [The Dearing report].
  59. Nunan, T., George, R. & McCausland, H. (2000) Rethinking the ways in which teaching and learning are supported: The Flexible learning centre at the University of South Australia, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(1), pp. 85-98.
  60. Rumble, G. (2000) Student support in distance education in the 21 st century: Learning from service management, Distance Education, 21(2), pp. 216-235.
  61. Salmon, G. (2000) E-moderating: The Key to teaching and learning online (London, Kogan Page).
  62. Tait, A. (2000) Planning student support for open and distance learning, Open Learning, 15(3), pp. 287-299.
  63. References ABC (Australian Broadcasting Commission) Radio National, 2001. The Digital Degree, The Big Idea. 3 June 2001. Part one: Permanent education has arrived (Australia, ABC).
  64. ALEXANDER, S. (1999) An evaluation of innovative projects involving communication and information technology in higher education, Higher Education Research and Development, 18(2), pp. 173-183.
  65. BAKER-ALBAUGH, P.R. (1993) What we see is not what we get, Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 7(3), pp. 36-39.
  66. BATES, T. (1986) Computer Assisted Learning or Communications: Which Way for Information Technology in Distance Education? Information Technology Paper No. 250 (Bletchley, Bucks, Institute of Educational Technology, Open University).
  67. BIGGS, J.B. (1987) Student Approaches to Learning and Studying (Melbourne, Australian Council for Education Research).
  68. BIGGS, J. (1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press).
  69. BOORSOOK, T.K. & HIGGINBOTHAM-WHEAT, N. (1991) Interactivity: what is it and what can it do for computer-based instruction? Educational Technology, 31(10), pp. 11-17.
  70. BOUD, D., COHEN, R. & SAMPSON, J. (1999) Peer learning and assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), pp. 413-426.
  71. BOUD, D., KEOGH, R. & WALKER, D. (1985) Promoting reflection in learning: a model, in: D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds) Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning (London, Kogan).
  72. DANIEL, J.S. (1997) Why universities need technology strategies, Change, 29(4), pp. 1-7.
  73. DANIEL, J. (1998) Can you get my hard nose in focus? Universities, mass education and appropriate technology, in: M. Eisenstadt & T. Vincent (Eds) The Knowledge Web (London, Kogan Page).
  74. DAVIE, L.E. (1988) Facilitating adult learning through computer-mediated distance education, Journal of Distance Education, III(2), pp.55-69
  75. FORSYTH, I. (1996) Teaching and Learning Materials and the Internet (London, Kogan Page). GIBBS, G. (1992) Improving the Quality of Student Learning (Bristol, Technical and Educational Services Ltd.).
  76. GILMER, P. (1999) Developing a discourse community: teaching biochemistry using the World Wide Web, in: J.A. Chambers, Ed. (Ed) Selected Papers from the 10th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning (Jacksonville, Florida Community College, Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning).
  77. HARA, N. AND KLING, R. (1999) Students' frustrations with a web-based distance education course, First Monday, 4(12), Available online at http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue4\_12/hara/index.html.
  78. HARLAMERT, J.A. (1998) Effect of distance education on student learning methodologies, Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 12(4), pp. 6-8.
  79. HORN, D. (1994) Distance education: is interactivity compromised, Emerging Technologies, October 1994.
  80. HUGHES, C. & HEWSON, L. (1998) Online interactions: developing a neglected aspect of the virtual classroom, Educational Technology, July-August, pp. 48-55.
  81. JOHNSON, D.W. & JOHNSON, R.T. (1988) Critical thinking through structured controversy, Educational leadership, 46, pp. 58-64.
  82. JONASSEN, D.H. (1995) Computers as cognitive tools: learning with technology, not learning from technology, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 6(2), pp. 40-73.
  83. JONASSEN, D.H. & GRABOWSKI, B.L. (1995) Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction (Hillsdale, New Jersey, Erlbaum).
  84. LAURILLARD, D. (1993) Rethinking University Teaching -A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology (London, Routledge).
  85. LINICH, M. (1999) Beyond constructivism in the life sciences, in: J.A. Chambers, (Ed) Selected Papers from the 10th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning (Jacksonville, Florida Community College, Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning).
  86. MCARTHUR, D. & LEWIS, M. (1997) Untangling the Web: Applications of the Internet and Other Information Technologies to Higher Education (Santa Monica, CA., Rand Corp., Inst. on Education and Training).
  87. MILHEIM, W.D. (1996) Interactivity and computer-based instruction, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24(3), pp. 225-233.
  88. MUIRHEAD, B.(moderator) (2000) Enhancing social interaction in computer-mediated distance education, International Forum of Educational Technology and Society: Formal References Advisory Committee for Online Learning, (2000) The e-learning (-volution in Schools and Colleges: A Pan-Canadian Challenge. Ottawa: Industry Canada.
  89. Aoki, K. and Pogroszewski (1998) Virtual university reference model: A guide to delivering education and support services to the distance learner. Fall, vol 1. 3. http://westga.edui-distance/aold/fal 14 1 /bothe141.ht [accessed June 4 20011
  90. Bothel, R. (2001) Bringing it all together. http://westiza.edui-distance/oidla/spriniz4libothel4t.html [ accessed June 4 2001] Koble, M. A. and Bunker, E. L. (1997) 'Trends in research and practice: An examination of The American Journal of Distance Education 1987 -1991'. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(2): 19 -3 8.
  91. Richardson, J. T. E. (2000) Researching Student Learning: Approaches to Studying in Campus Based and Distance Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  92. Robbins, J. (1999) Online delivery of academic skills: Feasible or feckless? Paper presented at Language and Learning: The learning dimensions of our work. Monash University, November 1999.
  93. Barry, I. Women, Literacy and Social Change: The case of the "Guilintico" Women's group in Gongore. Adult Education and Development IZZ DVV Volume 55 2000.
  94. Mezirow, J. (1991) Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Inc.
  95. Oduaran, A. Globalization and lifelong education: reflection on some challenges for Africa International Journal of Lifelong Education Volume 3 May-June 2000.
  96. Omolewa, M. The Language of Literacy. Adult Education and Development IZZ DVV Volume 55 2000.
  97. Shor, 1 (1987) Freire for the classroom: a source book for liberatory teaching. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers Inc.
  98. Walters, S., and Watters, K. Twenty Years of Adult Education in Southern Africa International Journal of Lifelong Education Volume 20 January -April 2001. References
  99. Bates, T. 1999, 'Cultural and ethical issues in international distance education', Engaging Partnerships: Collaboration and Partnership in Distance Education, UBC/CREAD conference, Vancouver, September 21-3, <http://bates.cstudies.ubc.ca/CREAD.html > (accessed 18 May, 2001).
  100. Bates, R. 2000, 'Administering the global trap: The role of educational leaders', BEMOS, <http://www.shu.ac.uk/bemas/bates.html > (accessed 5 May, 2001).
  101. Davis, D., Milne, C & Olsen, A. n.d., 'Becoming internationally competitive: The value of international experience for Australian students', IDP Education Australia, pp. 23-30.
  102. Kelly, P. 2000, 'Internationalising the curriculum: For profit or planet?', in The University in Transformation: Global Perspectives on the Futures of the University, eds S. Inayatullah & J. Gidley, Bergin & Garvey, Westport, CT.
  103. Rizvi, F. & Walsh, L. 1998, 'Difference, globalisation and the internationalisation of curriculum', Australian Universities' Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 1-11.
  104. Walsh, L. 1999, 'Encounters with difference: In search of new learning spaces through internationalisaton' ; AS CILITE, 'Diversity', <http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane99/papers/walsh.pdf >, (accessed 23 March 2001). Ziguras, C. 1999, 'Cultural diversity and transnational flexibility delivery', ASCILITE, 'Diversity', <http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane99/papers/ziguras.pdf > (accessed 22 March 2001). References Globalisation Guide.org . (2001). What is globalisation? (Vol. 2001), http://www.globalisationguide.org/01.html . 30.04.01.
  105. HAMES RD. (1994). The Management Myth,. Business and Professional Publishing. Sydney.
  106. HERZOG VL. (2001). Trust building on corporate collaborative project teams. Project Management, March, pp. 28-37.
  107. KNOWLES MS. (1970, 1980.). The modern practice if adult education; andragogy versus pedagogy. Association Press. New York.
  108. LAM TP. (2000). Discussions pertaining to GP CME via distance education (personal communication).
  109. LANIER, J. (1980). Collaboration sessions, discussant remarks. In Hall GE, Hoard S, & Brown G (Eds.), Exploring issues in teacher education: Questions for future research. pp. 405-410. Univeristy of Texas. Austin.
  110. LAWRENCE P. and LORSCH J. (1967). Organisation and environment. Irwin. Homewood, McWINNEY IR. (1997). A textbook of family practice. (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. New York.
  111. MONASH UNIVERSITY. (1999). Leading the way. Monash University. Melbourne. MONASH UNIVERSITY LEARNING AND TEACHING OPERATIONAL PLAN WORKING PARTY FOR JOINT DEGREES AND CERTIFICATES. (1999) The Cross- Institutional Programs. Monash University. Melbourne.
  112. NADLER DA, and TUSHMAN ML. (1997). Competing by design: the power of organisational architecture. Oxford University Press. New York PITERMAN L. (1992). A Graduate Diploma in Family Medicine. Medical Journal of Australia, Vol 157, pp. 178-181.
  113. PITERMAN L, PARER M., SCHATTNER P, and McCALL L. (2000a). Distance Education: Experience of the first 5 years of a Graduate Diploma/Masters in Family Medicine. Part 1 Conceptualisation and development. Australian Family Physician, Vol 29. Suppl 1. pp. 29:2- 6. PITERMAN L, PARER M., SCHATTNER P, and McCALL L. (2000b). Distance Education: Experience of the first 5 years of a Graduate Diploma/Masters in Family Medicine. Part 2. Student characteristics, program characteristics, administration and future direction. Australian Family Physician, Vol 29. Suppl 1. pp. 7-13
  114. MERMAN L, SCHATTNER P, PARER M, LAEURM E, and McCALL L. (2000c). Distance Education: Experience of the first 5 years of a Graduate Diploma/Masters in Family Medicine. Part 3. Assessment of and feedback to students at a distance. Australian Family Physician, Vol 29. Suppl 1. pp. 14-18.
  115. MERMAN L, and McCALL L. (2000d). Distance Education: Experience of the first 5 years of a Graduate Diploma/Masters in Family Medicine. Part 6. Evaluation of a core subject within the Graduate diploma/Masters in Family Medicine -Principles of General Practice. Australian Family Physician, Vol 29. Suppl 1. pp. 30-37.
  116. PITERMAN L, and McCALL L. (2000e). Distance Education: Experience of the first 5 years of a Graduate Diploma/Masters in Family Medicine. Part 7. Evaluation of the Graduate diploma in Family Medicine: does a distance education course for GPs influence their reported clinical and professional practice? Australian Family Physician, Vol 29. Suppl 1. pp. 38-41.
  117. SCHATTNER P, P1TERMAN L, LAEURM E, McCALL L, and PARER M. (2000a) Distance Education: Experience of the first 5 years of a Graduate Diploma/Masters in Family Medicine. Part 4. Supervision of family medicine research at a distance: a formative evaluation. Australian Family Physician, Vol 29. Suppl 1. pp. 19-25.
  118. SCHATTNER P, PUERMAN L, LAEURM E, McCALL L, and PARER M. (2000b) Distance Education: Experience of the first 5 years of a Graduate Diploma/Masters in Family Medicine. Part 5. Family medicine research at a distance: guidelines for supervisors. Australian Family Physician, Vol 29. Suppl 1. pp. 26-29.
  119. SMITH LFP. (1994). Higher professional training in the general practice: provision of Masters degree course in the United Kingdom in 1993. British Medical Journal, Vol 308, pp. 1679-1682.
  120. ST GEORGE IM, DURHAM JA, FARRY PJ, and MURDOCH JC. (1994). A Masters degree by distance education: the MGP (Otago). New Zealand Family Physician, Vol 21, pp. 134-137.
  121. STRASSER R. (1992). A Masters degree in Family Medicine. Medical Journal of Australia, Vol 156, pp. 178-181.
  122. THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE. (2001). Links to other universities (Vol. 2001) http://www.unimelb.edu.au/linksittaust.
  123. Monash University. (1999). Leading the way. Monash University. Melbourne. References FUJIBE, A. (1979) Public Libraries and Correspondence Course Students, Library and Information Science, 17, pp.183-211.
  124. KONDO, K (1985) The University Library and Guidance at the University of the Air, TOSHOKAN-ZASHI, 79(4), pp.202-204.
  125. MARSUMURO, T. and KAWASAKI, H. (1982) Distance Learners and Library, TOSHOKAN-K41, 34(1), pp.33-51.
  126. MATSUI, I. (1990), Students of Correspondence Courses, TOSHOKAN-KAI, 42(3), pp.206- 214 MATSUMOTO, T. (1981) "TSUKYO-BUNKO" at the Correspondence Course of Chuo University, TOSHOKAN-ZASHI, 75 (11), pp.686-687.
  127. MINAI, H (2000) Issues of Library Services and Distance Learning in: Japan AudioVisual Education Association ed. Research Report of Lifelong Learning with New Technology.
  128. MORI, T. (1987) Students and Library Services in the University of the Air, GENDAI-NO- TOSHOKAN, 25(1), pp.50-56.
  129. UNIVERSITY OF THE AIR, (2001) Outline of University of the Air 2001, p.2 REFERENCES
  130. Asbury. J. 1995. Views of focus group research. Qualitative health research. Vol. 5 No.4, pp. 144-420.
  131. Dillon, C. L and Gunawardena, C. N. 1992. Learner support in distance education: An evaluation of a statewide telecommunication system. International Journal of Instructional Media Vol.19 Issue4, pp. 297, p6 charts.
  132. Kruger, R. A. 1994. Focus group: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  133. Moore, D. M. 1996. A flexible learning system for South Africa. Open Learning in South Africa Review. No2. pp. 54-60.
  134. Morse, j. M. (1995) The significance of saturation. Qualitative health research, 24, 385-390.
  135. Pat, D. F and Hungler, B. P. 1991. Nursing research: Principles and methods. Fourth Edition. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company. (1998). South African Institute of Distance Education's (SAIDE) report on ILCDE Model for South Africa West. P. 1996. On-line Education via the Internet. Open Learning in South Africa Review. No2. pp. 87-82.
  136. Wilson, H. S. 1989. Research in Nursing. Second Edition. Readwood City: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. References
  137. Franklin, U., The Real World of Technology, Anansi Press, 1990
  138. Larocque, D., AlphaRoute Phase 2: A Research Report, Centre AlphPlus, Toronto, 1999
  139. Leach, J. "Learning in practice: Support for professional development", in Tait, A., and Mills, R., Supporting the Learner in Open and Distance Learning, New York, Routledge, 1999
  140. Lebel, C., "Le Support a l'etudiant en enseignement a distance", Journal of Distance Education, Vol. IV, No. 2
  141. Lentell, H., "Giving a voice to the tutors", in One World, Many Voices: quality in open and distance learning, Selected papers from the 1995 ICDE conference, Birmingham, England.
  142. Mills, R., "Diversity, convergence and student support", in Tait, A., and Mills, R., The Convergence of Distance and Conventional Education, New York, Routledge, 1999
  143. Paul, R., "If student support is so important, why are we cutting it back?", in D. Sewart, J. D., Daniel, eds, Developing Distance Education, ICDE, 1988, Oslo.
  144. Schon, D., Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco, Jossey Bass, 1987.
  145. Tait, A., "The convergence of distance and conventional education: some implications for policy", in Tait, A., and Mills, R., The Convergence of Distance and Conventional Education, New York, Routledge, 1999
  146. Tait, A., "Planning Student Support for Open and Distance Learning", Open Learning, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2000
  147. Tait, A., "Students and attachment: the nature of electronic relationships", Adults Learning, Vol. 11, No. 10, June 2000
  148. Yates, C., and Bradley, J., eds, Basic Education at a Distance, London, Routledge, 2000 Websites: Commonwealth of Learning: www.col.org LEAD International: www.lead.org References CYRANEK, G. (2000) Virtual Learning in the African Context (A paper prepared for PALOP workshop, 14-15 November 2000, Maputo, Mozambique. Addis Ababa, UNESCO). FILLIP, B. (2000) Distance Education in Africa: New Technologies and New Opportunities (Washington D.C., Japan International Cooperation Agency). IEC (2001) Imfundo: A review of experience with information and communications technologies in education projects (Report on a study carried out for Department for International Development Imfundo Project. Cambridge, IEC).
  149. JENSEN, M (1998) African Internet Connectivity: Summary of International ICT Development Projects in Africa http://demiurge.wn.apc.org/africa/projects.htm (last accessed 25 July 2001)
  150. KIRKWOOD, A. (2000) Shanty Towns around the Global Village? Reducing distance, but widening gaps with ICT (a paper presented to the Conference 'Distance Education: an Open Question?', Adelaide, South Australia, September 2000).
  151. LAURILLARD, D. (1993) Rethinking University Teaching (London, Routledge).
  152. PERRATON, H. (2000a) Information and Communication Technologies for Education in the South (Report on a study for the Department for International Development. Cambridge, IRFOL). PERRATON, H. (2000b) Open and distance learning in the developing world (Routledge, London).
  153. RUMBLE, G. (2001) E-education -Whose Benefits, Whose Costs? e_education_costs.pdf, , available at http://www.iec.ac.uk/resources online.html. (Last accessed 26 July 2001). References BECVAR, D.S., & BECVAR, R.J. 1996. Family therapy: A systemic integration (3rd ed.), Allyn & Bacon. Needham Heights, MA.
  154. CALLAHAN, C., & ELLIOTT, C.S. 1996. Listening: A narrative approach to everyday understandings and behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 17. No. 1, pp. 79-114.
  155. CHIARI, G., & NUZZO, M.L. 1996. Psychological constructivisms: A metatheoretical differentiation. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, Vol. 9, pp.163-184.
  156. CLANDININ, D.J., & CONNELLY, F.M. 1994. Personal experience methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.413-427). Sage. Thousand Oaks.
  157. DEAN, R.G. 1998. A narrative approach to groups. Clinical Social Work Journal, Vol. 26. No.1, pp. 23-37.
  158. DRAFT REPORT ON INTEGRATED LEARNER SUPPORT. 1997. University of South Africa, Pretoria.
  159. EASTON, S., & VAN LAAR, D. 1995. Experiences of lecturers helping distressed students in higher education. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, Vol. 23. No. 2, pp.173- 178. FUKS, S.I. 1998. Systems theory perspective and community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 26. No. 3, pp. 243-252.
  160. GEIDT, J. Feb 1996. Distance education into group areas won't go? Open Learning, Vol. 11. No.1, pp.12-21.
  161. GELKOPF, M., & KREITLER, S. 1996. Is humor only fun, an alternative cure or magic? The cognitive therapeutic potential of humor. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, Vol.10. No.4, pp.235-254.
  162. HART, B. 1995. Re-authoring the stories we work by : Situating the narrative approach in the presence of the family of therapists. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, Vol.16. No. 4, pp.181-189.
  163. HIRSCHOWITZ, R., & ORKIN, M. 1997. Inequality in South Africa: Findings from the 1994 October household survey. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 41. Nos. 1-3, pp.119-136.
  164. HOGAN, D., & KWIATKOWSKI, R. 1998. Emotional aspects of large group teaching. Human Relations, Vol. 51. No. 11, pp.1403-1417.
  165. IMEL, S., & TISDELL, E.J. 1996. The relationship between theories about groups and adult learning groups. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, Vol. 71, pp.15-24.
  166. KELLY, K. 1999. Hermeneutics in action: empathy and interpretation in qualitative research. In M. Terre Blanche & K. Durrheim. (Eds.), Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences (pp.398 -420). University of Cape Town Press. Cape Town. KNIGHTS, B. 1993. Hearing yourself teach: Group processes for adult educators. Studies in the Education of Adults, Vol. 25. No.2, pp.184-198.
  167. MITTEN, D.1995. Building the group: Using personal affirming to create healthy group process. The Journal of Experiential Education, Vol. 18. No.2, pp. 82-90.
  168. MOLLER, V. 1998. Quality of life in South Africa: Post-apartheid trends. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 43. Nos.1-2, pp.27-68.
  169. MOORE, C. 1997. A Self-Empowerment and Enrichment Programme: Changes in locus of control, self-efficacy and academic performance. Poster presentation: Fifth European Congress of Psychology, Dublin, 6-11 July, 1997.
  170. MOORE, C., VAN EDE, D., SHANTALL, T. & RAPMUND, V. 1997. A student self- empowerment and enrichment programme. Progressio, Vol. 19. No. 1, pp. 86-94.
  171. NYIKOS, M., & HASHIMOTO, R. 1997. Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: In search of ZPD. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 81. No.4, pp. 506-517.
  172. RAPMUND, V.J. 2000. Enhancing students' personal resources through narrative. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
  173. RAPPAPORT, J., & SIMKINS, R. 1991. Healing and empowering through community narrative. Religion and Prevention in Human Services, Vol. 10, pp. 29-50.
  174. RICHARDSON, R.C., jr., ORKIN, F.M., & PAVLICH, G.C. 1996. Overcoming the effects of apartheid in South African universities. The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 19. No.3, pp. 247-266.
  175. SALEEBY, D. 1996. The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. Social Work, Vol. 41. No.3, pp. 296-305.
  176. SEARIGHT, H.R., & YOUNG, R. 1994. Qualitative research and family systems medicine: A natural fit. Family Systems Medicine, Vol. 12. No. 2, pp.117-1 31. SPORAKOWSKI, M.J. 1992. Enhancing family life in the future: A potential for family therapists. Family Relations, Vol. 41, pp. 394-397.
  177. SURANSKY-DEKKER, C. 1997. Portraits of black schooling in South Africa. Research Report, Department of Curriculum Studies at the University of Durban-Westville, South Africa. SZUL, L.F. 1995. Working as part of a team. Business Education Forum. Vol. 50. No.1, pp. 25-27.
  178. THOMAS, S., & OLDFATHER, P. 1997. Intrinsic motivations, literacy, and assessment practices: "That's my grade. That's me." Educational Psychologist. Vol. 32. No.2, pp. 107- 123. THORPE, M. 1995. Reflective learning in distance education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. 10. No.2, pp. 153-167.
  179. WEEDON, E. 1997. A new framework for conceptualising distance education. Open Learning, Vol.12. No.1, pp.40-44.
  180. References ALLEN, J.M. & WIRCENSKI, D.M. (1988) Training Older Learners : Issues for the New Millennium: in Age share Research & Education Briefs, University of North Texas Asian Dermographics (2001) available at <http://www.asiandemographics.com/sumindia.htm > CLENNELL, S (1987) Older Students in Distance Education review in Open Learning, 4(1) (1989) DANIEL S .JOHN (1996) 'Mega Universities and knowledge Media Technology Strategies for Higher Education' Kogan Page Ltd, London..
  181. KELLY, P.,CUTRESS, N & PALMER, F. (1988) Distance Education and the Older Student, 14t ICDE Conference Oslo, ed. By D.SEWART AND J.S.DANIEL KEMBER, D (1995) Open learning courses for Adults: A model of student progress, Ednl.Tech.Publications, New Jersey.
  182. MORGAN K CHRISTOPHER & MAUREEN TAM (1999) Unravelling the complexities of Distance Education Student Attrition, Distance Education, 20(1), pp.96-108 SIMPSON, 0 (2000) Supporting students in open and Distance learning, kogan Page Ltd, London TERRY WHISNANT,W, JOHN C.SULLIVAN, SUSAN L SLAYTON (1993): 'The "Old" New Resource for Education -Student Age', The Community Service Catalyst, XXII (3). US Census Bureau (1998) World population profile:1998-Highlights, available at <http://www.census.gov/ipc/wwwfWp98001.htm > Vice Chancellor's Report (2001) IGNOU Twelfth Convocation, New Delhi World Health Organisation (1998) Population Ageing : A Public health Challenge, Fact Sheet No.135, available at <http://www.who.int/int.ts/en/fact135.html > material, and the methods employed in designing active participation of learners. From the reflection specific strategies can be devised to enhance the experience of learning among the learner population. The results of the study suggest avenues for further research. Firstly, how can the wealth of knowledge created by each group of learners be made available to future learners? Secondly, what model might be best used to examine the management development of each individual learner? Thirdly, what short term and long term impact does the study of management education offered have on the quality of education? Bibliography: Adams C. & King K. 1995. Towards a framework for student self-assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, November, 32(4):336-343.
  183. Arcaro J.S. 1995. Quality in Education. An implementation handbook. Delary Beach, Florida: St Lucie Press.
  184. Barr R.B. & Tagg J. 1995. From teaching to learning. A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, November/December, 13-25.
  185. Bradley L. H. 1993. Total Quality Management for Schools. Lancaster, Pennsylvania: Technomic Publishing Company.
  186. Daugherty A. 1996. Total Quality Education. Contemporary Education, Winter, 67(2):83-87.
  187. Eaton J.S. 1999. Distance education is on your doorstep. Trusteeship. January/February, 7(1):23-27.
  188. Fields J.C. 1993. Total Quality for schools. A suggestion for American education. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: ASQC Quality Process. Goodwin-Davey A. & Davey C. 2000. Development of learning resources for outcomes- based distance education. http://www.unisa.ac.za/dept/buo/prog re s s o/22( I )2000/mainline.
  189. Greenwood M.S. & Gaunt H.J. 1994. Total quality management for schools. London: Cassell.
  190. Griffin C. & Kilgore K.L. 1995. Framing the problems of practice. The effect of self- assessment in a study of special education students' internships. Teacher Education and Special Education, Winter, 18(1):56-71.
  191. Hart A.W. 1990. Effective administration through reflective practice. Education and Urban Society, February, 22(2): 153-169.
  192. Herman J. J. 1993. Holistic quality. Managing, restructuring, and empowering schools. Newbury Park: Corwin Press, Inc.
  193. Hobson E.H. 1996. Encouraging self-assessment. Writing the active learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. Fall, no 67: 45-58.
  194. Houser N. & Vaughan S. 1995. Meaning in transaction. A socio-psychological reconsideration of teaching and learning. Curriculum and Teaching. 10( I ):17-28.
  195. Jedrziewski D.R. 1995. Putting methods to the madness of evaluating training effectiveness. Performance and Instruction, January, 34(1):23.
  196. Jenkins H. 0. 1991. Getting it right. A handbook for successful school leadership. Oxford:Blackwell Education.
  197. Kottkamp R.B. 1990, Means for facilitating reflection. Education and Urban Society. February, 22(2):182-203.
  198. Leder G.C. 1993. Constructivism: Theory for Practice? The case of Mathematics. Higher Education Research and Development. 12(1):5-20
  199. Lee V.S.K. 1996. Quality assurance at the Open Learning Institute of Hong Kong. Open Learning, February, 11(0:59-64.
  200. Menmuir J. 1995. Quality assurance in the off-campus delivery of professional development opportunities. Open Learning, February, 10(1):43-46.
  201. Nielsen H.D. 1997. Quality assessment and quality assurance in distance teacher education. Distance Education, 18(2):284-317.
  202. Nouwens F. & Robinson P. 1991. Evaluation and the development of quality learning materials. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2):93-116.
  203. Nummendal S.G. 1996. Assessment and reflective teaching. Innovative Higher Education. Fall, 21(1):39-48.
  204. Osterman K.F. 1991. Reflective practice. Linking development and school reform. Planning and changing. 22(314):208-217.
  205. Prosser M. & Trigwell K. 1990. Student evaluation of teaching and courses. Student strategies as a criterion of validity. Higher Education, 20:135-142.
  206. Purnell K., Cuskelly E. & Danaher P. 1996. Improving distance education for university students. Issues and experiences of students in cities and rural areas. Journal of Distance Education, X1(2):75-101.
  207. Ramsden P. & Dodds A. 1989. Improving teaching and courses. A guide to evaluation. Parkville, Victoria: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
  208. Rinehart G. 1993. Building a vision for quality education. Journal of school leadership, May, 3, 260-268.
  209. Sherry A.C., Fulford, C.P. & Zhang S. 1998. Assessing distance learners' satisfaction with instruction. A qualitative and a qualitative measure. The American Journal of Distance Education, 12(3):4-28.
  210. Scholl D.A. 1995. Knowing-in-action. The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, November/December: 27-34.
  211. Swift J.A., Ross J.E. & Omachonu V.K. 1998. Principles of Total Quality. 2nd edition. St. Lucie Press: Boca Raton, Florida.
  212. Steyn G.M. 1997. Reviewing a module in Educational Management, Progressio, 19(2):79- 104.
  213. Tanner H. & Jones S. 1994. Using peer and self-assessment to develop modelling skills with students aged 11 to 16. A socio-constructive view. Educational Studies in Mathematics, December, 27:413-131.
  214. Van Niekerk D. & Herman N. 1996. Towards excellence in instructional design. A follow- up report. Progressio, 18(1):40-54.
  215. Weller L.D. & McElwee G. 1997. Strategic management of quality. An American and British perspective. Journal of Research and Development, Summer, 30(4):201-213.
  216. Wolcott L.L. 1995. The distance teacher as reflective practitioner. Educational Technology, February, 35(1):39-43.
  217. Wilson J. 1993. Total quality in education. Journal of Quality and Participation, January/February 16(1): 62-67. Bibliography
  218. Marcus, Aaron (2000): Cultural Dimensions and Global Web. User-Interface Design: What? So What? Now What? Internet: http://www.tri.sbc.com/hfweb/marcus/hfweb00\_marcus.html .
  219. Behrens, Ulrike (1999): Teleteaching is easy!? Padagogisch-psychologische Qualitatskriterien und Methoden der Qualitatskontrolle far Teleteaching-Projekte. Landau (Verlag Empirische Padagogik).
  220. Bund-Lander-Kommission far Bildungsplanung und Forschungsforderung (BLK) (1998): Multimedia im Hochschulbereich, Heft 63. Bonn.
  221. Hanson, Ward (2000): Principles of internet marketing. Cincinnati/ Ohio ( South-Western. College Publ.).
  222. Weber, Peter J. (1999): "Interkulturelles Lernen im Internet -eine Chance far die europaische Integration". In: Marquet, Pascal/Mathey, Stephanie/Jaillet, Alain/Nissen, Elke (eds./Hrsg.): Internet-based teaching and learning (IN-TELE) 98 (actes du colloque IN-TELE 98/proceedings of IN-TELE 98/IN-TELE 98
  223. Konferenzbericht), Berlin (Peter Lang), 57-64.
  224. Weber, Peter J./Reimann, Daniela/Ribold, Michael (1999): Certificate in Online Education and Training. Module 3 und 4: Konzeptionelle Planung einer Internetlemumgebung. Kursmaterial, Liineburg (Fernstudienzentrum).