Complicating the Conversion, Journal of Parapsychology, 2006 (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Classical Rhetoric of Modern Science
2005
Philosophers of rhetoric since antiquity have held for the most part that rhetorical arguments arise from three sources. These three sources are the speaker, the audience, aod the speech itself. Philosophers of science in recent times have successfully developed rhetorics of science from the first two sources of arguments. They have constructed rhetorical conceptions of the scientist and of the scientific audience.' Yet these philosophers appear to have neglected to develop a rhetoric of science from the third source of arguments.̂ Their neglect seems to be unfortunate, for arguments derived from the speech itself are those essential to rhetoric. In this paper I do not, however, intend to elaborate a rhetoric of science based on the third source of arguments. I shall not do so because a modero philosopher of science has already done so. He has developed an extensive rhetoric of modern science based on a classical conception of rhetorical proof. I refer to John Stuart Mill. My en...
This presentation connects developments in the science studies with those in scientific discourse analysis. Science studies has undergone a veritable anthropological revolution and come to pay more attention to the concrete situations in which science is elaborated in the laboratory. The focus is now on the rhetoric mobilised to convince peers or potential funding bodies, and on genres that had been heretofore neglected such as letter writing, oral exchanges, notes, memos, reports and paper submissions. A parallel renewal of linguistic and rhetorical approaches is all the more necessary because of this empirical focus: how is the writing process – with its linguistic and iconic characteristics – informed by production conditions? How is it informed by cognitive, epistemological and social issues? However, the role of the scientific author must not be forgotten as it is central to understanding scientific positioning. To succeed in initiating much-needed interdisciplinary dialogue, we need to clarify the subjects at stake – authorship and scientific discourse –, as well as their connection to linguistic and semiotic forms.
Scientific writing: following Robert Boyle's principles in experimental essays -1704 and 1998
Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 2007
Science and scientific method have evolved in parallel with changes in philosophical ideas. One aspect of the discipline affected by these changes is the way in which scientists' results should be shown to the world. However, it was not until the second half of the 17th century that the first recommendations or guidelines for reporting scientific discoveries appeared. The Royal Society became the first institution to concern itself with the form this new discourse should take. The aim of this paper is to analyse the linguistic evolution experienced by two pieces of scientific writing and to examine to what extent the two texts follow the recommendations of Robert Boyle and the Royal Society concerning the patterns scientific discourse should observe. Two texts were selected for the task, one published at the beginning of the 18th century, the other at the end of the 20th. For the purposes of comparison, the texts analysed are from the same discipline and both report an experimen...
Developments and trends in the Rhetoric of Science
European Journal of English Studies, 2013
The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.