The Duty to Investigate Possible War Crimes: Has a Decision by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Been Overtaken by Subsequent Developments in International Humanitarian Law? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Przegląd Europejski, 2022
The issue of military command is an issue which, under the rules of international criminal law, involves a number of numerous issues, related to the regime of commander liability. The case of Russia's armed assault on Ukraine and the questions arising in connection with the possibility of prosecuting the President of the Russian Federation, as well as military commanders - has revived the discussion on the issue of criminal liability of the main actors in these events. If the trials took place, those in leadership positions would be tried under the regime of commander’s liability. Since the Nuremberg Tribunal, the issue of superior responsibility has undergone extensive changes. The article presents the influence of the jurisprudence of the Yugoslav tribunal on the formation of regulations on military command. This is because it was the first international court that had to face this issue. The International Criminal Court built on its experience, clarified the concept of comman...
International Legal Materials
otherwise noted, the articles in this issue of Criminal Law Forum are based on U.N. Doc. IT/32/Rev.1 (1994). This appendix prints the most recent text of the rules, set out in U.N. Doe. IT/32/Rev.3 (1995), indicating in {braces} all deletions from U.N. Doe. IT/32/Rev.1 (1994), and indicating in boldface type all additions to that document, so that the reader can compare the current text of the rules with the version the contributors are discussing. (Part and section titles are set in boldface type as a matter of style but none of these has changed.) Where the numerical or letter designation of a provision has changed, the new designation is indicated in boldface type but the former designation is not shown. It can be determined by examining the other changes in the rule. In Rule 77, for example, the addition of sub-rules 77(C) and 77(D) necessitated the redesignation of the provision that was previously sub-rule 77(C) as sub-rule 77(E).
Responsibility for war crimes before national courts in Croatia
International Review of the Red Cross, 2006
This article analyses problems with which the Republic of Croatia, as a country in transition, has to contend during war crimes proceedings. A major characteristic of the recent wars waged on the territory of the former Yugoslavia is that war crimes were committed, though on a different scale, by all parties involved, irrespective of the political and other motives that prompted them to engage in armed conflict. Political unwillingness is the principal reason why national courts, including those in the Republic of Croatia, did not prosecute war crimes in accordance with internationally acceptable standards. The international community responded by setting up the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the main objectives of which are to establish justice, render justice to victims and determine the historical truth. Implicitly, despite political and other opposition to its work, the ICTY is helping to define legal and ethical standards appropriate for a dem...
Status and Perspectives of War Crimes Processing in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Research in Rehabilitation, 2019
Serious, systematic and massive violations of international humanitarian law were committed during the 1992-1995 armed conflict in the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The criminal prosecution and prosecution of perpetrators of these violations of international humanitarian law falls within the jurisdiction of several courts of various levels, namely the ICTY, the courts in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as the courts of other countries, in accordance with the principle of universal jurisdiction. However, the fact that is justifiably worrying is that, even after 24 years since the end of the war, the work on prosecuting those responsible for violations of international humanitarian law in Bosnia and Herzegovina is nowhere near completion. This is a consequence of non-compliance with the guidelines of the National War Crimes Processing Strategy, implementation of various laws at the state and entity levels, as well as limited regional cooperation and dialogue. The results of the...