Design Patterns for Cross-Cultural Computer-Supported Collaborative Design Learning (original) (raw)
Related papers
Interaction and Interface Design Patterns for Intercultural Collaboration
2005
This paper reports about on-going research into interaction design patterns in intercultural remote collaboration. It proposes that interaction and interface design patterns help to communicate and generate new design knowledge in supporting intercultural teamwork. It describes methods used to observe and develop design patterns in collocated, remote and blended collaborative learning and design contexts, and reports preliminary findings of interface and interaction design patterns, which support intercultural remote collaboration.
Design Studies, 2004
This study examined the intensity of collaboration in computer supported collaborative designing.It focused on how ten teams of university level students of textile teaching shared their designing process in a virtual learning environment.An authentic task involving clothing for premature babies was used.The study employed qualitative content analysis of students’ written notes and sketches posted to the database.The results indicated that collaborative design processes exhibited three characteristic patterns and varying intensity: coordination, cooperation, and collaboration. In three of the teams, the design process turned out to be highly collaborative in respect of students developing a joint design object and being intensely involved in organizing the design process.
This study examined the intensity of collaboration in computer supported collaborative designing. It focused on how ten teams of university level students of textile teaching shared their designing process in a virtual learning environment. An authentic task involving clothing for premature babies was used. The study employed qualitative content analysis of students’ written notes and sketches posted to the database. The results indicated that collaborative design processes exhibited three characteristic patterns and varying intensity: coordination, cooperation, and collaboration. In three of the teams, the design process turned out to be highly collaborative in respect of students developing a joint design object and being intensely involved in organizing the design process.
The Collabor 8 Project: Realities within Design-Based Online Cross-Cultural Collaboration
"This paper discusses the implications, challenges and opportunities for design educators revealed in a case study examining the online interactions of ninety-four graphic design and visual communications students from universities and colleges in Australia and China. The Collabor8 Project (C8) was at first seen as a vehicle to examine the relationship between cultural background, cognition and media types in collaborative online design education. However data gathered through observation, questionnaire, student discussions, and the integration of specific research tasks into design briefs highlighted a complex interplay of internal and external dynamics suggesting that a disjuncture existed in many students’ understanding of what was expected of them regardless of media used to deliver the lectures and briefs in C8. Language, divergent student expectations, different levels and styles of knowledge production, and outside forces such as the Sichuan earthquake, are important areas of focus in this study exposing what might be described as multiple realities within the project. The preliminary findings suggest that successful online collaboration between Western and Confucian heritage culture (CHC) design students will most likely be born out of an approach that is representative of all cultural inputs. Continued research and intercultural cooperation will be crucial to facilitating online intercultural collaboration necessary for preparing students for work in the globalised, technological landscape of contemporary design practice. Keywords: Design Education, Cross-Cultural, Collaboration, Online, China, Australia"
Collocated, Multi-Disciplinary, Collaborative Designspace An overview
This review identifies the research findings in the area of computer mediated, collocated, multi-disciplinary collaborative design. After a general look into this and related research areas, three influencing aspects of collaborative design are reviewed. Design activities, working together, and collaborative systems that fit into various work practices. Finally, we note missing points of research in the area of collocated, multi-disciplinary, collaborative design.
Case Study Instrument Development for Studying Collaborative Design
2006
This paper outlines a research instrument developed to analyze the relationship between communication modes, leadership styles, and team composition. The instrument is a survey that captures this information from collaborative design team members. This information can be correlated with team success, and the productive characteristics can be encouraged in future groups. The survey was distributed and analyzed in small numbers, and first round recommendations and student feedback are gathered. The developed instrument gathers background information on the student, group, and project. The project itself was defined in four stages: Problem Definition, Concept Generation, Concept Selection, and Concept Expansion. The students were asked questions about the team leadership style based on the Vroom-Yetton Model. The students were then asked how often they used various communication modes (verbal, textual, and graphical) when communicating Peer-to-Peer, Peer-to-Group, and Group as a Whole. These questions were repeated for each of the design stages. The instrument was structured and refined in order to analyze the behavior of undergraduate design students. It is intended to provide researchers and educators a tool to evaluate and critique collaborative behavior in order to streamline the design process. However, the survey was formulated broadly enough to be used in an industrial setting with small changes in the format to accommodate more experienced designers. The analysis of the original distribution revealed that the survey should be broken down into four parts corresponding to the four design stages and administered longitudinally. The authors of this paper attempt to find the specifics of the relationships between leadership styles, communication modes, and team structure in an undergraduate design environment. A deeper understanding of these relationships will assist team leaders at the academic and industrial level in creating more productive teams and maximizing the efficiency of communication.
The purpose of the present study was to examine how collaborative designing could be facilitated by a new generation networked learning environment (Future Learning Environment, FLE-Tools) and to analyze whether and how students working in the environment were able to share their design process. The study was carried out by analyzing qualitatively knowledge posted to FLE-Tools’ database by three courses of first-year textile students (N=34) who were engaged in a collaborative design project that focused on designing clothing for prematurely born babies. The study indicated that designing in the network environment facilitated engagement of expert-like designing in a sense of supporting specification of constraints related to designing clothing to premature neonates through indepth problem structuring and search of new information. A design challenge of FLE-Tools is to provide more effective tools for collaborative work with visual sketches as well as developing tools and practices that would help to share knowledge emerging not only in the conceptual but also during the actual manufacturing phase of designing.
Design patterns for computer supported groupwork
2009
This paper describes work-in-progress in the area of educational design patterns. More specifically, the paper highlights a relatively neglected area in educational design for technology-supported learning -the various ways in which students can be grouped together to work collaboratively on study activities. Thus, it looks at the 'people' component of the 'task, tools and people' design model. The paper outlines this design model, sketches the 'people' component and offers an example design pattern to illustrate how design knowledge can be shared through design patterns and pattern languages. The research has implications for anyone who is concerned about sharing good ideas for technology-supported collaborative learning, whether in small, medium-sized or large groups (from dyads to learning communities).
The purpose of the present study was to examine how collaborative designing could be facilitated by a new generation networked learning environment (Future Learning Environment, FLE-Tools) and to analyze whether and how students working in the environment were able to share their design process. The study was carried out by analyzing qualitatively knowledge posted to FLE-Tools’ database by three courses of first-year textile students (N=34) who were engaged in a collaborative design project that focused on designing clothing for prematurely born babies. The study indicated that designing in the network environment facilitated engagement of expert-like designing in a sense of supporting specification of constraints related to designing clothing to premature neonates through indepth problem structuring and search of new information. A design challenge of FLE-Tools is to provide more effective tools for collaborative work with visual sketches as well as developing tools and practices that would help to share knowledge emerging not only in the conceptual but also during the actual manufacturing phase of designing.