Cultivating creativity in engineering and science education (original) (raw)
Related papers
Student Creativity through Project-based Learning Experiences
2019
This study aims to analyze students’ creativity through project-based learning experiences in a electrochemistry topic. Subject of this study was 40 students from Chemistry Education Study Program who took basic chemistry course. Students experienced several activities, namely: forming groups of three, asking and refining questions, debating ideas, making predictions, designing plans and/or experiments, collecting and analyzing data, drawing conclusions, communicating their ideas and findings to others, asking new questions, and creating artifacts like a model, a videotape, or a media. Then, the lecturer monitored the students and the progress of the project, assessed the outcome and evaluated the experience resulting students-in group’ creativity profile. Research instruments are project assessment rubrics and observation sheets. Findings show that students’ creativity in groups ranges from less to very good or from 48.15 to 92.59. Although there are still shortcomings with this s...
Teaching Engineering Students Creativity: A Review of Applied Strategies
Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 2012
Recent studies have emphasized the necessity of educating creative engineers. This paper aims to provide a literature review by answering what strategies can be applied to develop creativity in engineering education. As the literature demonstrates, creativity has been studied by a diversity of perspectives such as psychology, social psychology and sociology. Studies on engineering creativity indicate the importance of problem-solving skills for engineers. For developing creativity, strategies such as using thinking tools, learning by solving problems and building learning environment conductive to creativity have been suggested in engineering education. Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is a strategy of developing creativity. So characteristics of PBL, learning cycle in PBL and methods for enhancing group dynamics in PBL are discussed in this paper. In addition, Aalborg University in Denmark is introduced as an example of PBL strategy.
The development of creativity in engineering students
2012
BACKGROUND Engineering teaching practices typically tends to be dominated by the application of scientific principles. This often encourages standard measures and procedures for engineering activities. This can inadvertently reduce engineering students' creative capabilities, which are particularly critical in their transitions to their early professional careers. PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to highlight challenges faced by engineering students when developing their practical creative capabilities. From this a better understanding of the type of formal teaching required can be had. DESIGN/METHOD Engineering students in two different subjects, machine design and engineering management, were given large projects that required a report to be produced. In the report the students were to document a creativity tool that they found and then used to solve an identified problem that needed creativity. While students were given a list of tools to help their searching, that is all that they were given. After assessment a focus group about the experience and challenges faced by the students while taking on these challenges was held for each group. RESULTS Preliminary results indicate that students enjoy taking on challenges that require creativity. However, for the development of creativity, students' background and understanding of creativity within engineering, as along with the context required to support creativity, should be addressed. This is particularly the case when students seem to be struggling to recognise the situations that require creativity. CONCLUSIONS Engineering students need to be taught more than creativity. They need to be taught how to combine this with their knowledge of engineering theory to develop ingenious solution, which is the work of the engineer.
Creative education, 2024
Creativity should be cultivated in higher education to tackle the increasingly complex healthcare problems; however, despite this need for novelty, students collaborating in groups to solve a complex problem often seek consensus around low-novelty ideas. This study aims to explore the challenges higher education student groups face while evaluating and improving creative ideas, and to identify teaching activities that overcome these challenges. A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 14 teachers from the "innovation project" at Radboud university medical center in Netherlands. The results show that student groups face challenges in balancing the goals of novelty and usefulness in their search for creative ideas, often selecting either novel ideas that are infeasible or ineffective, or useful ideas that already exist. Furthermore, teachers also identified problematic group dynamics as a challenge in the idea evaluation process. To overcome these challenges, teachers reported using cognitive, affective, metacognitive, and sociocommunicative teaching activities. In conclusion, higher education students may not develop their most creative ideas even when creative solutions are required. This study highlights the importance of teaching higher education students to skilfully manage the twin goals of novelty and usefulness in their search for creative solutions, while also dealing with group dynamics.
Enhancing creativity in engineering students
Engineering Science & Education Journal, 2002
Enhancing creativity in engineering students by Caroline 'The most important developments in civilisa tion have come through the creative process, but ironically, most people have not been taught to aillie There is an increasing n order to maintain a competitive edge and to respond quickly to market challenges, companies are increasingly aware of the need for creative solutions. Research by the Council for Industry and the Department for Education' suggests that employers are loolung for more than adaptive recruits; they are loolung for transformative employees: 'people who can use hgher level skills, such as analysis, critique, synthesis and multi-layered communication to fachtate innovative teamwork 'employees who can use their abilities and skills to evolve the organisation'. In recent years, industry, and in particular the engineering industry, has begun to focus on the lack of 'creative thinlung' and innovation in graduates. The research councils and professional institutions have responded to t h s by increasing their demands for hghquality training of both postgraduate research students and professionals. The recent 'Joint Statement of the Research Councils'/AHRB's* Skills Training Requirements for Research StudentP sets out the skdls that funded doctoral students are expected to develop *AH-: Arts and Humanities Research Board during their research. The statement specifically features: 'the ability to recognise and vahdate problems' 'original, independent and critical thinking', and 'being creative, innovative and original in one's approach to research'.
Creativity and engineering education
2010
The paper reviews the experiences in implementation of methods for enhancing creativity in engineering education. At the beginning it discusses the public perception of engineering work and recapitulates the general views on creativity. Next it reminds on the common aspects of creativity and innovativeness in engineering. Then it summarizes the basics of creative processes and some of the often mentioned methods for provoking and stimulating creativity such as brain storming, brain writing 6-3-5 methods, lateral thinking, TRIZ, methods like the Walt Disney creativity strategy, design for six sigma, synectics and ideation in general. The paper in the continuation compiles some reported experiences in teaching creatively and learning creativity in engineering education such as active learning and problem based learning. At the end it presents some examples of student involvements in creative problem solving projects at the Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering in Zagreb.
Creativity Training for Future Engineers: Preliminary Results from an Educative Experience
arXiv (Cornell University), 2015
Due in part to the increased pace of cultural and environmental change, as well as increased competition due to globalization, innovation is become one of the primary concerns of the 21st century. We will present an academic course designed to develop cognitive abilities related to creativity within an engineering education context, based on a conceptual framework rooted in cognitive sciences. The course was held at École Polytechnique de Montréal (ÉPM), a world renowned engineering school and a pillar in Canada's engineering community. The course was offered twice in the 2014-2015 academic year and more than 30 students from the graduate and undergraduate programs participated. The course incorporated ten pedagogical strategies, including serious games, an observation book, individual and group projects, etc., that were expected to facilitate the development of cognitive abilities related to creativity such as encoding, and associative/analytical thinking. The CEDA (Creative Engineering Design Assessment) test was used to measure the students' creativity at the beginning and at the end of the course. Field notes were taken after each of the 15 three-hour sessions to qualitatively document the educative intervention along the semester and students gave anonymous written feedback after completing the last session. Quantitative and qualitative results suggest that an increase in creativity is possible to obtain with a course designed to development cognitive abilities related to creativity. Also, students appreciated the course, found it relevant, and made important, meaningful learnings regarding the creative process, its cognitive mechanism and the approaches available to increase it.
Creativity Training for Future Engineers: Preliminary Results of an Educational Intervention
2015
Due in part to the increased pace of cultural and environmental change, as well as increased competition due to globalization, innovation is become one of the primary concerns of the 21st century. We will present an academic course designed to develop cognitive abilities related to creativity within an engineering education context, based on a conceptual framework rooted in cognitive sciences. The course was held at École Polytechnique de Montréal (ÉPM), a world renowned engineering school and a pillar in Canada's engineering community. The course was offered twice in the 2014-2015 academic year and more than 30 students from the graduate and undergraduate programs participated. The course incorporated ten pedagogical strategies, including serious games, an observation book, individual and group projects, etc., that were expected to facilitate the development of cognitive abilities related to creativity such as encoding, and associative/analytical thinking. The CEDA (Creative Engineering Design Assessment) test was used to measure the students' creativity at the beginning and at the end of the course. Field notes were taken after each of the 15 three-hour sessions to qualitatively document the educative intervention along the semester and students gave anonymous written feedback after completing the last session. Quantitative and qualitative results suggest that an increase in creativity is possible to obtain with a course designed to development cognitive abilities related to creativity. Also, students appreciated the course, found it relevant, and made important, meaningful learnings regarding the creative process, its cognitive mechanism and the approaches available to increase it.