Bringing a Time–Depth Perspective to Collective Animal Behaviour (original) (raw)

Abstract

The field of collective animal behaviour examines how relatively simple, local interactions between individuals in groups combine to produce global-level outcomes. Existing mathematical models and empirical work have identified candidate mechanisms for numerous collective phenomena but have typically focused on one-off or short-term performance. We argue that feedback between collective performance and learning – giving the former the capacity to become an adaptive, and potentially cumulative, process – is a currently poorly explored but crucial mechanism in understanding collective systems. We synthesise material ranging from swarm intelligence in social insects through collective movements in vertebrates to collective decision making in animal and human groups, to propose avenues for future research to identify the potential for changes in these systems to accumulate over time. What Are Collective Behaviours and How Do They Arise? Some of the most impressive biological phenomena emerge out of interactions among members of animal groups. Bird flocks, fish schools, and insect swarms perform highly coordinated collective movements that can encompass thousands of individuals, producing complex group-level patterns that are difficult to predict from the behaviour of isolated individuals only. Animal groups are also able to solve problems that are beyond the capacities of single individuals [1]; ant colonies, for example, tackle certain types of optimisation problems so effectively that they have inspired an entire field of computer science [2]. Despite the appearance of synchronised organisation, it is increasingly well understood that no central control acts on the collective as a whole; instead, the global patterns result from simple, local interactions among the group's neighbouring members – a form of biological self-organisation [3] (see Glossary). Recent years have seen a proliferation of both empirical and theoretical work on the mechanistic underpinnings of collective animal behaviour [4], with self-organisation emerging as a major principle in various contexts including collective motion [5], decision making [6] and construction [7], activity synchronisation [8], and the spontaneous emergence of leader–follower relations [9]. Nonetheless, a rigorous adaptive framework is yet to be applied to collective animal behaviour; little is known about the nature of the selective forces that act at the level of the individual behavioural rules to shape pattern formation at group level. Over shorter timescales, and crucially for this review, no major synthesis has yet examined collective behaviour from a time–depth perspective; we do not know: (i) what changes group-level organisation might undergo over the course of repeated executions of collective tasks; (ii) to what extent solutions arrived at collectively are retained (learned), either at the individual or at the collective level, with the potential to influence future interactions; or (iii) what effect changes in group composition, due to natural demographic processes, have on whether solutions are 'inherited' from previous generations.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (93)

  1. Krause, J. et al. (2009) Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 28-34
  2. Dorigo, M. et al. (2006) Ant colony optimization. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 1, 28-39
  3. Camazine, S. et al. (2001) Self-Organisation in Biological Systems, Princeton University Press
  4. Sumpter, D.J.T. (2010) Collective Animal Behavior, Princeton Uni- versity Press
  5. Vicsek, T. and Zafeiris, A. (2012) Collective motion. Phys. Rep. 517, 71-140
  6. Sasaki, T. and Pratt, S.C. (2012) Groups have a larger cognitive capacity than individuals. Curr. Biol. 22, R827-R829
  7. Latty, T. et al. (2011) Structure and formation of ant transportation networks. J. R. Soc. Interface 8, 1298-1306
  8. Néda, Z. et al. (2000) The sound of many hands clapping. Nature 403, 849-850
  9. Couzin, I.D. et al. (2005) Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433, 513-516
  10. Renfrew, C. et al. (2000) Time Depth in Historical Linguistics, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
  11. Seeley, T.D. (1997) Honey bee colonies are group-level adaptive units. Am. Nat. 150, S22-S41
  12. Farine, D.R. and Montiglio, P. (2015) From individuals to groups and back: the evolutionary implications of group phenotypic com- position. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 609-621
  13. Tomasello, M. et al. (1993) Cultural learning. Behav. Brain Sci. 16, 495-552
  14. Pettit, B. et al. (2013) Not just passengers: pigeons, Columba livia, can learn homing routes while flying with a more experienced conspecific. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20122160
  15. Flack, A. and Biro, D. (2013) Collective learning in route navigation. Commun. Integr. Biol. 6, e26521
  16. Kao, A.B. et al. (2014) Collective learning and optimal consensus decisions in social animal groups. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003762
  17. Dávid-Barrett, T. and Dunbar, R.I.M. (2014) Social elites can emerge naturally when interaction in networks is restricted. Behav. Ecol. 25, 58-68
  18. Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J. (1988) Culture and the Evolutionary Process, University of Chicago Press
  19. Tomasello, M. (1999) The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition, Harvard University Press
  20. Dean, L.G. et al. (2014) Human cumulative culture: a comparative perspective. Biol. Rev. 89, 284-301
  21. Aoki, K. et al. (2011) Rates of cultural change and patterns of cultural accumulation in stochastic models of social transmission. Theor. Popul. Biol. 79, 192-202
  22. Henrich, J. (2004) Demography and cultural evolution: how adap- tive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses -the Tasmanian case. Am. Antiq. 69, 197-214
  23. Fogarty, L. et al. (2015) Cultural evolutionary perspectives on creativity and human innovation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 736-754
  24. Caldwell, C.A. and Millen, A.E. (2008) Studying cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 3529-3539
  25. Caldwell, C.A. and Millen, A.E. (2010) Human cumulative culture in the laboratory: effects of (micro) population size. Learn. Behav. 38, 310-318
  26. Dean, L.G. et al. (2012) Identification of the social and cognitive processes underlying human cumulative culture. Science 23, 1114-1118
  27. Surowiecki, J. (2004) The Wisdom of Crowds, Random House
  28. Sumpter, D.J.T. et al. (2008) Consensus decision making by fish. Curr. Biol. 18, 1773-1777
  29. Ward, A.J.W. et al. (2008) Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 6948-6953
  30. Dell'Ariccia, G. et al. (2008) Flock flying improves pigeons' homing: GPS track analysis of individual flyers versus small groups. Anim. Behav. 76, 1165-1172
  31. Pettit, B. et al. (2015) Speed determines leadership and leader- ship determines learning during pigeon flocking. Curr. Biol. 25, 3132-3137
  32. Faria, J.J. et al. (2009) Navigation in human crowds; testing the many-wrongs principle. Anim. Behav. 78, 587-591
  33. Sumpter, D.J. and Pratt, S.C. (2009) Quorum responses and consensus decision making. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 743-753
  34. Simons, A.M. (2004) Many wrongs: the advantage of group navi- gation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 453-455
  35. Ward, A.J.W. et al. (2011) Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 2312-2315
  36. Schaerf, T.M. et al. (2013) Do small swarms have an advantage when house hunting? The effect of swarm size on nest-site selec- tion by Apis mellifera. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130533
  37. Seeley, T.D. et al. (2012) Stop signals provide cross inhibition in collective decision-making by honeybee swarms. Science 335, 108-111
  38. Chittka, L. et al. (2009) Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal deci- sion making. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 400-407
  39. Franks, N.R. et al. (2003) Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270, 2457-2463
  40. Krause, J. and Ruxton, G.D. (2002) Living in Groups, Oxford University Press
  41. Ballerini, M. et al. (2008) Interaction ruling animal collective behav- ior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 1232-1237
  42. Conradt, L. and Roper, T.J. (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 449-456
  43. Biro, D. et al. (2006) From compromise to leadership in pigeon homing. Curr. Biol. 16, 2123-2128
  44. Nesterova, A.P. et al. (2014) Resolution of navigational conflict in king penguin chicks. Anim. Behav. 93, 221-228
  45. Bousquet, C.A.H. and Manser, M.B. (2011) Resolution of experi- mentally induced symmetrical conflicts of interest in meerkats. Anim. Behav. 81, 1101-1107
  46. Strandburg-Peshkin, A. et al. (2015) Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons. Science 348, 1358-1361
  47. Franks, N.R. et al. (2013) Speed-cohesion trade-offs in collective decision making in ants and the concept of precision in animal behaviour. Anim. Behav. 85, 1233-1244
  48. Bill, R.G. and Herrnkind, W.F. (1976) Drag reduction by formation movement in spiny lobsters. Science 193, 1146-1148
  49. Liao, J.C. et al. (2003) Fish exploiting vortices decrease muscle activity. Science 302, 1566-1569
  50. Williams, T.M. et al. (1992) Travel at low energetic cost by swim- ming and wave-riding bottlenose dolphins. Nature 355, 821-823
  51. Noren, S.R. et al. (2008) Hitching a ride: the formation locomotion strategy of dolphin calves. Funct. Ecol. 22, 278-283
  52. Weimerskirch, H. et al. (2001) Energy saving in flight formation. Nature 413, 697-698
  53. Fish, F.E. (1995) Kinematics of ducklings swimming in formation - consequences of position. J. Exp. Zool. 273, 1-11
  54. Kurvers, R.H.J.M. et al. (2015) Self-organized flexible leadership promotes collective intelligence in human groups. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2, 150222
  55. Lusseau, D. and Conradt, L. (2009) The emergence of unshared consensus decisions in bottlenose dolphins. Behav. Ecol. Socio- biol. 63, 1067-1077
  56. Stroeymeyt, N. et al. (2010) Improving decision speed, accuracy and group cohesion through early information gathering in house- hunting ants. PLoS ONE 5, e13059
  57. Oster, G.F. and Wilson, E.O. (1978) Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects, Princeton University Press
  58. Couzin, I.D. (2009) Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 36-43
  59. Couzin, I.D. et al. (2002) Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. J. Theor. Biol. 218, 1-11
  60. Portugal, S.J. et al. (2014) Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight. Nature 505, 399-402
  61. Voelkl, B. et al. (2015) Matching times of leading and following suggest cooperation through direct reciprocity during V-formation flight in ibis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 2115-2120
  62. Langridge, E.A. et al. (2004) Improvement in collective perfor- mance with experience in ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56, 523-529
  63. Caldwell, C.A. and Millen, A.E. (2008) Experimental models for testing hypotheses about cumulative cultural evolution. Evol. Hum. Behav. 29, 165-171
  64. Mueller, T. et al. (2013) Social learning of migratory performance. Science 341, 999-1002
  65. Wallraff, H.G. (2005) Avian Navigation: Pigeon Homing as a Para- digm, Springer
  66. Biro, D. et al. (2004) Familiar route loyalty implies visual pilotage in the homing pigeon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 17440-17443
  67. Nagy, M. et al. (2010) Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks. Nature 464, 890-893
  68. Flack, A. et al. (2015) Modelling group navigation: transitive social structures improve navigational performance. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20150213
  69. Bode, N.W.F. et al. (2011) The impact of social networks on animal collective motion. Anim. Behav. 82, 29-38
  70. Pratt, S.C. et al. (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collec- tive decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Lepto- thorax albipennis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52, 117-127
  71. Sasaki, T. et al. (2013) Ant colonies outperform individuals when a sensory discrimination task is difficult but not when it is easy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 13769-13773
  72. Sasaki, T. and Pratt, S.C. (2011) Emergence of group rationality from irrational individuals. Behav. Ecol. 22, 276-281
  73. Langridge, E.A. et al. (2007) How experienced individuals contrib- ute to an improvement in collective performance in ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 447-456
  74. Sasaki, T. and Pratt, S.C. (2013) Ants learn to rely on more informative attributes during decision-making. Biol. Lett. 9, 20130667
  75. May, R.M. (1979) Flight formations in geese and other birds. Nature 282, 778-780
  76. Lissaman, P.B.S. and Shollenberger, C.A. (1970) Formation flight of birds. Science 168, 1003-1005
  77. Andersson, M. and Wallander, J. (2004) Kin selection and reci- procity in flight formation? Behav. Ecol. 15, 158-162
  78. Lack, D.L. (1954) The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers, Clarendon Press
  79. Petit, D.R. and Bildstein, K.L. (1986) Development of formation flying in juvenile white ibises (Eudocimus albus). Auk 103, 244-246
  80. Usherwood, J.R. et al. (2011) Flying in a flock comes at a cost in pigeons. Nature 474, 494-497
  81. Bailey, I. et al. (2013) Group hunting within the Carnivora: physio- logical, cognitive and environmental influences on strategy and cooperation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67, 1-17
  82. Bednarz, J.C. (1988) Cooperative hunting Harris' hawks (Para- buteo unicinctus). Science 239, 1525-1527
  83. Gazda, S.K. et al. (2005) A division of labour with role specialization in group-hunting bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off Cedar Key. Florida. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272, 135-140
  84. Tardin, R.H.O. et al. (2011) Coordinated feeding tactics of the Guiana dolphin, Sotalia guianensis (Cetacea: Delphinidae), in Ilha Grande Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Zoologia (Curitiba) 28, 291-296
  85. Neil, D.T. (2002) Cooperative fishing interactions between Aborig- inal Australians and dolphins in eastern Australia. Anthrozoos A Multidiscip. J. Interact. People Anim. 15, 3-18
  86. Lopez, J.C. and Lopez, D. (1985) Killer whales (Orcinus orca) of Patagonia, and their behavior of intentional stranding while hunting nearshore. J. Mammal. 66, 181-183
  87. Guinet, C. (1991) Intentional stranding apprenticeship and social play in killer whales (Orcinus orca). Can. J. Zool. 69, 2712-2716
  88. Pitman, R.L. and Durban, J.W. (2012) Cooperative hunting behav- ior, prey selectivity and prey handling by pack ice killer whales (Orcinus orca), type B, in Antarctic Peninsula waters. Mar. Mam- mal Sci. 28, 16-36
  89. Visser, I.N. et al. (2008) Antarctic peninsula killer whales (Orcinus orca) hunt seals and a penguin on floating ice. Mar. Mammal Sci. 24, 225-234
  90. Rendell, L. and Whitehead, H. (2001) Culture in whales and dolphins. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 309-382
  91. Cantor, M. and Whitehead, H. (2013) The interplay between social networks and culture: theoretically and among whales and dolphins. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 368, 20120340
  92. Connor, R.C. (2001) Individual foraging specializations in marine mammals: culture and ecology. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 329-330
  93. Pruitt, J.N. and Pinter-Wollman, N. (2015) The legacy effects of keystone individuals on collective behaviour scale to how long they remain within a group. Proc. Biol. Sci. 282, 20151766