Looking and Digging: Non-Intrusive Survey, Relations of Knowledge and Hierarchies of Information in Cultural Resource Management (original) (raw)
Related papers
Management of cultural heritage – reflection from the Republic of Macedonia
The independence of the Republic of Macedonia created the necessary preconditions for the transformation of cultural institutions. For the most part, the transformation meant decentralization of government-funded institutions. However, the law was not very helpful for the institutions, which came under the management of local governments not ready to take up this responsibility. Macedonian museums are burdened by the lack of management and by the politicization that occurred in the last 20 years. A complete re-evaluation of museums and providing them with the best possible management will be necessary to overcome all these problems. In 2013, in an attempt to transfer the artifacts from the old to the new building of the Archaeological Museum in Skopje, curators discovered one of the biggest thefts ever registered in Macedonia. More than one hundred gold artifacts from the period of Antiquity were missing. This event calls into question not only the security, but also the overall management of cultural heritage. Instead of having these findings published in archaeological journals, they will probably end up in private collections, without any hope to become available to the public. This project is dedicated to the Macedonian museums and to every other museum in the world, which by the similarity of circumstances can be the subject of looting and destruction.
Varstvo spomenikov - Journal for the Protection of Monuments, 2018
The paper sets out the theoretical basis for the management of cultural heritage in general and archaeological heritage in particular. It came into being in the context of the cross--border project “Claustra – The Stone Ramparts of the Roman Empire” and therefore takes into account conditions in heritage management in both Slovenia and Croatia. On the basis of an analysis of the situation, the key weaknesses of the present method of management are set out, and a modern systemic approach to the issue is formulated, taking into account the standards of cultural heritage management adopted by two key international organisations in the conservation field, namely the Council of Europe and UNESCO.
Archaeological resource management and preservation
It should be obvious to everybody working in archaeology today that the position of the discipline has gone through some rather drastic changes over the past 15 years or so. As the former Chief Archaeologist of English Heritage, Geoff Wainwright, put it in a lecture on The future of European Archaeology at the inaugural meeting of the Europae Archaeologiae Consilium few years ago: 'the central importance of cultural heritage for social and economic progress around the globe is increasingly recognised as a vital element in creating a different kind of world and as an essential building block in the social and economic well-being of people. Indeed, archaeology and its allied cultural-historical disciplines are more important than its practitioners care to admit. In Europe today we start from the proposition that we simply cannot have social and economic development without recognition of our cultural heritage and history. It is widely recognised by international bodies, national and local governments, the international world of commerce; academia; the media and non-governmental bodies that society cannot move forward into the future unless it understands and acknowledges the past from which we come. This view of the relationship between cultural heritage and socio-economic development is not controversial nor is it solely the view of an elitist practitioner. It is a view that will be found in towns and villages throughout Europe, who cherish their sense of place and provide the fuel for many debates regarding its future' (Wainwright 2000). Obviously, this perception of heritage is very much one of the 21 rst century and is rather different from the ideas about the role of cultural heritage that we grew up with. I assume that in retrospect, the adoption -in 1992 -of the European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage, or the Malta Convention as it is better known, which has meanwhile been ratified by most European countries, will prove to have been a watershed, at least in Europe. It defines a standard for the management of archaeological properties and provides a frame of reference for countries that have not ratified the convention yet and also for countries outside Europe, where a comparable international standard is lacking.
ON THE CROSS-PATH OF CULTURAL IDEAS Macedonia, the Balkans, Southeast Europe - Heritage, Management, Resources, 2020
Collection of papers from the Conference held in Ohrid in September 2029 on investigation, protection and management of cultural heritage: Ratko Duev, Elizabeta Dimitrova, Irena Teodora Vesevska and Jovana Savevska organizers.
Archaeological Site Management - Arheo Park Brazda
KOKINO: GIVING GIFTS TO GOD - EVIDENCES OF VOTIVE OFFERINGS IN THE SANCTUARIES, TEMPLES AND CHURCHES, 2016
Preservation of archaeological heritage in situ has become one of the pillars of archaeological site management. Archaeological site management has a very important role in the protection, promotion and presentation of the cultural heritage in every developed country but in the case of R. Macedonia it’s pretty neglected. A great example is the archaeological site Gradište, v. Brazda which lies on the southwestern slopes of the mountain Skopska Crna Gora, at only 10 km from the city center. The site became well known in the archaeological circles after the discovery of a monumental Royal tomb in the 80's. Unfortunately, after this big discovery it was almost forgotten and it was constantly damaged by the inconsiderate visitors and time itself. In this paper I will point out how a small archaeological site could get the needed attention and protection with a little bit of proper management and with promotion of heritage education and raising of public awareness of the local population.
Introduction: Managing Archaeological Sites in Greece
Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 2013
This special issue on the Management of Archaeological Sites in Greece discusses the context within which archaeological site management takes place in the country and aims to address the problems and challenges raised by management practice through the examination of specifi c case studies. The papers, representing the work of both practitioners and academics/researchers, underline the severe social, economic, and political circumstances under which heritage management in Greece is conducted. However, at the same time, the regional focus on Greece is of interest to a broader international audience because it addresses themes that are globally relevant to heritage professionals. Indeed, the papers of this volume highlight some interesting projects and approaches that merit consideration in the wider fi eld. Furthermore, this collection of papers intends to move beyond the dominant international (mainly Anglophone) heritage management discourse by offering a perspective from a socio-political context (Greece) that differs substantially from that of North America, Australia, or the UK, but nonetheless demonstrates certain commonalities with countries in southern Europe, the Balkans, and the Eastern Mediterranea n. Despite the existence of literature that collectively examines heritage management in different continents (see, for example,